We explored the effects of language-based stigma on the relationship between native and nonnative speakers. In two studies, we found that stigmatized nonnative speakers experienced more negative interpersonal interactions, higher levels of intergroup threat, and reduced performance on an English test compared with nonnative speakers who did not experience stigma. These effects were mediated by anxiety and moderated by prevention-related goals. Furthermore, native speakers perceived stigmatized (vs. not-stigmatized) speakers’ accents as stronger and their commitment to living in the host country as weaker. Our findings suggest that experiencing language-based stigma can (a) incite a stereotype threat response from nonnative speakers, and (b) damage their relationship with native speakers on an interpersonal and intergroup level.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.PhillipsK. W.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research. Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 235-244. doi:10.1177/1745691614527466
3.
AronsonJ.McGloneM. S. (2009). Stereotype and social identity threat. In NelsonT. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 153-178). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
BallP.GalloisC.CallanV. J. (1989). Language attitudes: A perspective from social psychology. In CollinsP.BlairD. (Eds.), Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 89-102). St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
5.
BarretoM. (2014). Experiencing and coping with stigma. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 2. Group processes.(pp. 473-506). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14342-018
6.
BeebeL.GilesH. (1984). Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5-32. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.5
7.
BlascovichJ.SpencerS. J.QuinnD.SteeleC. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12, 225-229. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00340
8.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ.KurzbanR. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 173-179. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00057-3
9.
CrandallC. S.MoriartyD. (2011). Physical illness stigma and social rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 67-83. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01049
10.
CrystalD. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DerwingT. M. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents?Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 547-567. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547
12.
DerwingT. M.RossiterM. J. (2002). ESL learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 30, 155-166. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00012-X
13.
DovidioJ. F.GluszekA. (2012). Accents, nonverbal behavior, and intergroup bias. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 87-99). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DragojevicM.GilesH.BeckA.TatumN. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitude. Communication Monographs, 84, 385-405. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
15.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.KopietzR.GrollS. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 137, 3-31. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.3
16.
EchterhoffG.LangS.KramerN.HigginsE. T. (2009). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of audience status in sharing reality. Social Psychology, 40, 150-163. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.150
17.
FeldmanD. B.CrandallC. S. (2007). Dimensions of mental illness stigma: What about mental illness causes social rejection?Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 137-154. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.137
18.
FlegeJ. E.MunroM. J.MacKayI. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125-3134. doi:10.1121/1.413041
19.
FlowerdewJ. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 77-86. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.002
20.
FrumkinL. (2007). Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 317-331. doi:10.1080/10683160600822246
21.
FussellS. R.KraussR. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90019-X
22.
GalloisC.Franklyn-StokesA.GilesH.CouplandN. (1988). Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters. In KimY. Y.GudykunstW. B. (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 157-185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
GalloisC.OrgayT.GilesH. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In GundykunstW. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121-148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
GasiorekJ.GilesH. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 309-331. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01426.x
25.
GeschkeD.MummendeyA.KesslerT.FunkeF. (2010). Majority members’ acculturation goals as predictors and effects of attitudes and behaviours towards migrants. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 489-506. doi:10.1348/014466609X470544
GilesH. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory. Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York, NY. Cambridge University Press.
29.
GilesH.MulacA.BradacJ. J.JohnsonP. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The next decade and beyond. In McLaughlinM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
GilesH.WillemynsM.GalloisC.AndersonM. C. (2007). Accommodating a new frontier: The context of law enforcement. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 129-162). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
31.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010a). Speaking with a non-native accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 224-234. doi:10.1177/0261927X09359590
32.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010b). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 214-237. doi:10.1177/1088868309359288
33.
GluszekA.NewheiserA. K.DovidioJ. F. (2011). Social psychological orientations and accent strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 28-45. doi:10.1177/0261927X10387100
34.
GreeneJ. O.SparksG. G. (1983). Explication and test of a cognitive model of communication apprehension: A new look at an old construct. Human Communication Research, 9, 349-366. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00704.x
35.
GregoryS. W.WebsterS. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231-1240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231
36.
HamersJ. F.BlancM. H. A. (1989). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2014). When actions speak louder than words: Preventing discrimination of nonstandard speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 68-77. doi:10.1177/0261927X13499761
38.
HarwoodJ.JoyceN. (2012). Intergroup contact and communication. In GilesH. (Ed.), Handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 167-180). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
HayesA. F. (2012). A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (White Paper). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
40.
HessT. M.HinsonJ. T. (2006). Age-related variation in the influences of aging stereotypes on memory in adulthood. Psychology and Ageing, 21, 621. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.621.
41.
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-45. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
42.
HosodaM.NguyenL. T.Stone-RomeroE. F. (2012). The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 347-364. doi:10.1108/02683941211220162
43.
HosodaM.Stone-RomeroE. (2010). The effects of foreign accents on employment-related decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 113-132. doi:10.1108/02683941011019339
44.
KesslerA. E.FreemanG. P. (2005). Public opinion in the EU on immigration from outside the community. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43, 825-850. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00598.x
45.
Lev-AriS.KeysarB. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093-1096. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
46.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with accents: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
48.
MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D.CuddyA. J. C.PolifroniM. (2008). When being a model minority is good . . . and bad: Realistic threat explains negativity toward Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 74-89. doi:10.1177/0146167207309195
49.
McGloneM. S.PfiesterR. A. (2015). Stereotype threat and the evaluative context of communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 111-137. doi:10.1177/0261927X14562609
50.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
51.
MoyerA. (2004). Age, accents, and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
52.
MoyerA. (2007). Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28, 502-518. doi:10.2167/jmmd514.0
53.
NesdaleD.RooneyR. (1996). Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 133-154. doi:10.1177/0261927X960152002
54.
NeuliepJ. W.Speten-HansenK. M. (2013). The influence of ethnocentrism on social perceptions of nonnative accents. Language and Communication, 33, 167-176. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2013.05.001
55.
NewheiserA. K.BarretoM.EllemersN.DerksB.ScheepersD. (2015). Regulatory focus moderates the social performance of individuals who conceal a stigmatized identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 787-797. doi:10.1111/bjso.12107
56.
OsborneJ. W. (2007). Linking stereotype threat and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 27, 135-154. doi:10.1080/01443410601069929
57.
PaladinoM. P.PoddesuL.RauziM.VaesJ.CadinuM.ForerD. (2009). Second language competence in the Italian-speaking population of Alto Adige/Sudtirol: Evidence for linguistic stereotype threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 222-243. doi:10.1177/0261927X09335333
58.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
59.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 51-57. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.005
60.
PhillipsonR. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London, England: Routledge.
61.
PurcellE. T.SuterR. W. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A re-examination. Language Learning, 30, 271-287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00319.x
62.
RoesselJ.SchoelC.StahlbergD. (2017). What’s in an accent? General spontaneous biases against non-native accents: An investigation with conceptual and auditory IATs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 535-550. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2339
63.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
64.
SimardL. M.TaylorD. M.GilesH. (1976). Attribution processes and interpersonal accommodation in a bilingual setting. Language and Speech, 19, 374-387. doi:10.1177/002383097601900408
65.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 42-28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
66.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
67.
StoneJ. (2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667-1678. doi:10.1177/014616702237648
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 406-412. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.008
70.
ZhaoB.OndrichJ.YingerJ. (2006). Why do real estate brokers continue to discriminate? Evidence from the 2000 housing discrimination study. Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 394-419. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2005.12.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
