Autobiographical reports of episodes of ostracism and social inclusion were analyzed in two separate samples (German N = 93; English N = 243) using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software. Recalling ostracism was associated with the use of more first-person singular pronouns, fewer first-person plural pronouns, and more complex language. These findings could reflect ostracism inducing a self-focus and putting high cognitive load on its targets. This study provides a first step to establish linguistic analysis as a tool for the research of social exclusion.
ArendI.ColomR.BotellaJ.José ContrerasM.RubioV.SantacreuJ. (2003). Quantifying cognitive complexity: Evidence from a reasoning task. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 659-669. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00243-X
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BrewerL. E.TiceD. M.TwengeJ. M. (2007). Thwarting the need to belong: Understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 506-520. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00020.x
3.
BoalsA.KleinK. (2005). Word use in emotional narratives about failed romantic relationships and subsequent mental health. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 252-268. doi:10.1177/0261927X05278386
4.
BrennanS. E.HannaJ. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274-291. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x
5.
ChenZ.WilliamsK. D.FitnessJ.NewtonN. C. (2008). When hurt will not heal: Exploring the capacity to relive social and physical pain. Psychological Science, 19, 789-795. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02158.x
6.
ChungC. K.PennebakerJ. W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343-359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
7.
CohnM. A.MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 687-693. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
8.
EdwardsT.HoltzmanN. S. (2017). A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 63-68. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.005
9.
EisenbergerN. I. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134
10.
FunderD. C.SneedC. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479-490. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.479
11.
GuilloryJ.SpiegelJ.DrislaneM.WeissB.DonnerW.HancockJ. (2011). Upset now? Emotion contagion in distributed groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 745). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979049
12.
HartgerinkC. H. J.van BeestI.WichertsJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies. PLoS One, 10, e0127002. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127002
13.
HooverC. W.WoodE. E.KnowlesE. S. (1983). Forms of social awareness and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 577-590. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90017-3
14.
IckesW.ReidheadS.PattersonM. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you.”Social Cognition, 4, 58-74. doi:10.1521/soco.1986.4.1.58
15.
KacewiczE.PennebakerJ. W.DavisM.JeonM.GraesserA. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 125-143. doi:10.1177/0261927X13502654
16.
KlaukeF.KauffeldS.Müller-FrommeyerL. C. (2019). Talking about the silence: Identifying the language of ostracism. A replication. Retrieved from osf.io/z2kue
17.
KowalskiR. M. (2000). “I was only kidding!” Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 231-241. doi:10.1177/0146167200264009
18.
MeierT.BoydR. L.PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.MartinM.WolfM.HornA. B. (2018). “LIWC auf Deutsch”: The development, psychometrics, and introduction of DE-LIWC2015. doi:10.17605/osf.io/tfqzc
19.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236. doi:10.1080/01638530802073712
20.
NezlekJ. B.WesselmannE. D.WheelerL.WilliamsK. D. (2012). Ostracism in everyday life. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 91-104. doi:10.1037/a0028029
21.
PalanS.SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac: A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27. doi:10.1016/J.JBEF.2017.12.004
PennebakerJ. W.ChungC. K.FrazeeJ.LavergneG. M.BeaverD. I. (2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLOS ONE, 9, e115844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
24.
PennebakerJ. W.LayT. C. (2002). Language use and personality during crises: Analyses of mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s press conferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 271-282. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2349
25.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
26.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095-1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085
27.
RivaP.WirthJ. H.WilliamsK. D. (2011). The consequences of pain: The social and physical pain overlap on psychological responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 681-687. doi:10.1002/ejsp.837
28.
SaccoD. F.WirthJ. H.HugenbergK.ChenZ.WilliamsK. D. (2011). The world in black and white: Ostracism enhances the categorical perception of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 836-842. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.001
29.
SegalowitzS. J.LaneK. (2004). Perceptual fluency and lexical access for function versus content words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 307-308. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04310071
30.
TackmanA. M.SbarraD. A.CareyA. L.DonnellanM. B.HornA. B.HoltzmanN. S.. . . MehlM. R. (2018). Depression, negative emotionality, and self-referential language: A multi-lab, multi-measure, and multi-language-task research synthesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 817-834. doi:10.1037/pspp0000187
31.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
32.
TwengeJ. M.CataneseK. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 409-423. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.409
33.
WegnerD. M.GiulianoT. (1980). Arousal-induced attention to self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 719-726. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.38.5.719
34.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
35.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
36.
WilliamsK. D.BernieriF. J.FaulknerS. L.Gada-JainN.GraheJ. E. (2000). The Scarlet Letter study: Five days of social ostracism. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 5, 19-63. doi:10.1080/10811440008407846
37.
WirthJ. H. (2016). Methods for investigating social exclusion. In RivaP.EckJ. (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 25-47). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
