This study investigates Americans’ attitudes toward the four major accents of South African English (SAfE) and several of their subvarieties in a hypothetical U.S. employment scenario. Participants perceived that SAfE accents possess positive language personality traits in comparison with standard American English; however, respondents identify SAfE speakers as foreign and perceive specific SAfE-accented varieties to be superior and more dynamic (e.g., General/Cultivated White SAfE and Indian SAfE) in relation to other SAfE-accented speakers (e.g., Mesolect Black SAfE and Cape Flats SAfE), even when they do not correctly identify the speaker’s country of origin.
BowermanS. (2008). White South African English: Phonology. In MesthrieR. (Ed.), Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia (pp. 164-175). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
CarlsonH. K.McHenryM. A. (2006). Effect of accent and dialect on employability. Journal of Employment Counseling, 43, 70-83.
3.
Coetzee-Van RooyS.Van RooyB. (2005). South African English: Labels, comprehensibility and status. World Englishes, 24, 1-19.
4.
DragojevicM. (2016). Language attitudes as intergroup terrain. In GilesH.MaassA. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 51-66). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
5.
DragojevicM.GilesH.BeckA. C.TatumN. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84, 385-405.
6.
DragojevicM.GilesH.WatsonB. M. (2013). Language ideologies and language attitudes. In GilesH.WatsonB. M. (Eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect and accent (pp. 1-11). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
7.
FlegeJ. E.HammondR. M. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 1-17.
8.
GilesH.MarlowM. L. (2011). Theorizing language attitudes: Existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. In SalmonC. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 35, pp. 161-197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
GilesH.PoweslandP. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London, England: Academic Press.
10.
GilesH.WilsonP.ConwayT. (1981). Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceived employment suitability. Language Sciences, 3, 91-103.
11.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010). Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 224-234.
12.
HosodaM.Stone-RomeroE. F. (2010). The effects of foreign accents on employment-related decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 113-132.
KalinR.RaykoD.LoveN. (1980). The perception and evaluation of job candidates with four different ethnic accents. In GilesH.RobinsonW. P.SmithP. M. (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 197-202). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
15.
LassR. (2002). South African English. In MesthrieR. (Ed.), Language in South Africa (pp. 104-126). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LindemannS. (2005). Who speaks “broken English”? U.S. undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 187-212.
17.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (pp. 5-30). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
McKenzieR. M. (2008). The role of variety recognition in Japanese university students’ attitudes towards English speech varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29, 139-153.
19.
McKenzieR. M. (2015). The sociolinguistics of variety identification and categorization: Free classification of varieties of spoken English amongst non-linguistic listeners. Language Awareness, 24, 150-168.
20.
MesthrieR. (2002). Introduction. In MesthrieR. (Ed.), Language in South Africa (pp. 1-6). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
MesthrieR. (2008). Black South African English: Morphology and syntax. In MesthrieR. (Ed.), Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia (pp. 488-492). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
22.
MongerR.YankayJ. (2014, May). U.S. lawful permanent residents: 2013 (Annual Flow Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.
23.
PerloffR. M. (2014). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
PurkissS. L. S.PerrewéP. L.GillespieT. L.MayesB. T.FerrisG. R. (2006). Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 152-167.
25.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). When it matters how you pronounce it: The influence of regional accents on job interview outcome. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 868-883.
26.
ReitzJ. G. (2001). Immigrant success in the knowledge economy: Institutional change and the immigrant experience in Canada. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 579-613.
27.
RyanE. B.CarranzaM. A.MoffieR. W. (1977). Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20, 267-273.
28.
ShuckG. (2004). Conversational performance and the poetic construction of an ideology. Language in Society, 33, 195-222.
29.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
