Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-1
Shedding New Light on the Evaluation of Accented Speakers: Basic Mechanisms Behind Nonnative Listeners’ Evaluations of Nonnative Accented Job Candidates
The present research unites two emergent trends in the area of language attitudes: (a) research on perceptions of nonnative speakers by nonnative listeners and (b) the search for general, basic mechanisms underlying the evaluation of nonnative accented speakers. In three experiments featuring an employment situation, German participants listened to a presentation given in English by a German speaker with a strong versus native-like accent (in Studies 1–3) versus a native speaker of English (in Study 1). They evaluated candidates with a strong accent worse than candidates with a native(-like) pronunciation—even to the degree that the quality of arguments was of no relevance (Study 1). Study 2 introduces an effective intervention to reduce these discriminatory tendencies. Across studies, affect and competence emerged as major mediators of hirability evaluations. Study 3 further revealed sequential indirect influences, which advance our understanding of previous inconsistent findings regarding disfluency and warmth perceptions.
AhmedZ. T.AbdullahA. N.HengC. S. (2014). Malaysian university students’ attitudes towards six varieties of accented speech in English. Advances in Language & Literary Studies, 5, 181-191.
2.
AnisfeldM.BogoN.LambertW. E. (1962). Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 223-231.
3.
Baese-BerkM. M.BradlowA. R.WrightB. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 174-180.
4.
BeinhoffB. (2014). Perceiving intelligibility and accentedness in non-native speech: A look at proficiency levels. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 58-72. Retrieved from http://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/6_Beinhoff_Vol5.pdf
5.
BirdsongD. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9-49.
6.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.
7.
BresnahanM. J.OhashiR.NebashiR.LiuW. Y.ShearmanS. M. (2002). Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language & Communication, 22, 171-185.
8.
BrownR. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
9.
BussD. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
10.
ButlerY. G. (2007). How are nonnative-English-speaking teachers perceived by young learners?TESOL Quarterly, 41, 731-755.
11.
Caldwell-HarrisC. L. (2015). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Implications for everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 214-219.
12.
CallanV. J.GalloisC.ForbesP. A. (1983). Evaluative reactions to accented English ethnicity, sex role, and context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 407-426.
13.
CargileA. C.GilesH.RyanE. B.BradacJ. J. (1994). Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language & Communication, 14, 211-236.
14.
ChenS. X.BondM. H. (2007). Explaining language priming effects: Further evidence for ethnic affirmation among Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 398-406.
15.
ChenS. X.BondM. H. (2010). Two languages, two personalities? Examining language effects on the expression of personality in a bilingual context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1514-1528.
16.
ChibaR.MatsuuraH.YamamotoA. (1995). Japanese attitudes toward English accents. World Englishes, 14, 77-86.
17.
ClarkeC. M.GarrettM. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647-3658.
18.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378.
19.
CrystalD. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DaileyR. M.GilesH.JansmaL. L. (2005). Language attitudes in an Anglo-Hispanic context: The role of the linguistic landscape. Language & Communication, 25, 27-38.
21.
Dalton-PufferC.KaltenboeckG.SmitU. (1997). Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes, 16, 115-128.
22.
del PuertoF. G.García LecumberriM. L.Gómez LacabexE. (2015). The assessment of foreign accent and its communicative effects by naïve native judges vs. experienced non-native judges. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25, 202-224.
23.
Deprez-SimsA.-S.MorrisS. B. (2010). Accents in the workplace: Their effects during a job interview. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 417-426.
24.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2009). Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 181-202.
25.
DovidioJ. F.GluszekA. (2012). Accents, nonverbal behavior, and intergroup bias. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 87-99). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
DragojevicM.GilesH. (2016). I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research, 42, 396-420.
27.
DragojevicM.GilesH.BeckA.-C.TatumN. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84, 385-405.
28.
DuñabeitiaJ. A.CostaA. (2015). Lying in a native and foreign language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1124-1129.
29.
EderA. B.HommelB.De HouwerJ. (2007). How distinctive is affective processing? On the implications of using cognitive paradigms to study affect and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1137-1154.
30.
FayerJ. M.KrasinskiE. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37, 313-326.
31.
FiskeS. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perceptions. In ClarkM. S.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on cognition (pp. 55-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
33.
FlegeJ. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692-707.
34.
FuertesJ. N.GottdienerW. H.MartinH.GilbertT. C.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 120-133.
35.
GerhardsJ. (2010). Mehrsprachigkeit im vereinten Europa: Transnationales sprachliches Kapital als Ressource in einer globalisierten Welt [Multilingualism in united Europe: Transnational linguistic capital as a resource in a globalized world]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
36.
GilesH. (1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 22, 211-227.
37.
GilesH.BillingsA. C. (2004). Assessing language attitudes. In DaviesA.ElderC. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 187-209). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
38.
GilesH.MarlowM. L. (2011). Theorizing language attitudes. In SalmonC. T. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 35 (pp. 161-197). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
GilesH.WatsonB. M. (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech style. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
40.
GluszekA.DovidioJ. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 214-237.
41.
GluszekA.HansenK. (2013). Language attitudes in the Americans. In GilesH.WatsonB. M. (Eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech style (pp. 26-44). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
42.
GoldrickM.RunnqvistE.CostaA. (2014). Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science, 25, 1031-1036.
43.
GraddolD. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of “English as a foreign language”. London, England: British Council.
44.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2014). When actions speak louder than words: Preventing discrimination of nonstandard speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 68-77.
45.
HaseltonM. G.NettleD. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 47-66.
46.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1-22.
48.
HosodaM.Stone-RomeroE. F.WalterJ. N. (2007). Listeners’ cognitive and affective reactions to English speakers with standard American English and Asian accents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 307-326.
49.
HuG.LindemannS. (2009). Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 30, 253-269.
50.
HuangL.FridegerM.PearceJ. L. (2013). Political skill: Explaining the effects of nonnative accent on managerial hiring and entrepreneurial investment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1005-1017.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
53.
KeysarB.HayakawaS. L.AnS. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23, 661-668.
54.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.DeJesusJ.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27, 623-634.
55.
LambertW. E.HodgsonR. C.GardnerR. C.FillenbaumS. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44-51.
56.
LangP. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In SidowskiJ. B.JohnsonJ. H.WilliamsT. A. (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119-137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In LangP. J.SimonsR. F.BalabanM. (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
59.
LindemannS. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 348-364.
60.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. London, England: Routledge.
61.
MaassA.CastelliL.ArcuriL. (2000). Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. In CapozzaD.BrownR. (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 96-116). London, England: Sage.
62.
MaiR.HoffmannS. (2014). Accents in business communication: An integrative model and propositions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 137-158.
63.
McKenzieR. M. (2010). The social psychology of English as a global language. London, England: Springer.
64.
MendesW. B.BlascovichJ.HunterS. B.LickelB.JostJ. T. (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 698-716.
65.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K.BeckerD. V. (2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 62-77.
66.
MonteithM. J.ArthurS. A.McQueary FlynnS. (2010). Self-regulation and bias. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 493-507). London, England: Sage.
67.
MoyerA. (2004). Age, accents, and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
68.
MoyerA. (2014). What’s age got to do with it? Accounting for individual factors in second language accent. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 443-464.
69.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73-97.
70.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289-306.
71.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2014). Mplus (Version 7.2) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
72.
PantosA. J.PerkinsA. W. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 3-20.
73.
ParkH. (2013). Detecting foreign accent in monosyllables: The role of L1 phonotactics. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 78-87.
74.
PerryS. P.MurphyM. C.DovidioJ. F. (2015). Modern prejudice: Subtle, but unconscious? The role of bias awareness in Whites’ perceptions of personal and others’ biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 64-78.
75.
PhelpsE. A.O’ConnorK. J.CunninghamW. A.FunayamaE. S.GatenbyJ. C.GoreJ. C.BanajiM. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-738.
76.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 16-29.
77.
RoesselJ.SchoelC.StahlbergD. (2018). What’s in an accent? General spontaneous biases against nonnative accents: An investigation with conceptual and auditory IATs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 535-550.
78.
RubinD. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgements of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511-531.
79.
RyanE. B. (1983). Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 148-159.
80.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2010). Affective processes. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 131-145). London, England: Sage.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
83.
Spencer-RodgersJ.McGovernT. (2002). Attitudes toward the culturally different: The role of intercultural communication barriers, affective responses, consensual stereotypes, and perceived threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 609-631.
TalaskaC. A.FiskeS. T.ChaikenS. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263-296.
86.
TokumotoM.ShibataM. (2011). Asian varieties of English: Attitudes towards pronunciation. Word Englishes, 30, 392-408.
87.
TopolinskiS.StrackF. (2009). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1465-1504.
88.
UraM.PrestonK. S. J.MearnsJ. (2015). A Measure of Prejudice Against Accented English (MPAAE): Scale development and validation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 539-563.
89.
WangZ.ArndtA. D.SinghS. N.BiernatM.LiuF. (2013). “You lost me at hello”: How and when accent-based biases are expressed and suppressed. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 185-196.
90.
WeberA.Di BettaA. M.McQueenJ. M. (2014). Treack or trit: Adaptation to genuine and arbitrary foreign accents by monolingual and bilingual listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 34-51.
91.
WittemanM. J.WeberA.McQueenJ. M. (2014). Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 512-519.
92.
YookE. L.AlbertR. D. (1999). Perceptions of international teaching assistants: The interrelatedness of intercultural training, cognition, and emotion. Communication Education, 48, 1-17.
93.
YzerbytV.ProvostV.CorneilleO. (2005). Not competent but warm . . . really? Compensatory stereotypes in the French-speaking world. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 291-308.
94.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
