Swearing is prevalent in our society, but the influence of such language choices on judgments of others is not well understood. This study examines how the composition of conversational dyads, speaker’s gender, and use of profanity influence impressions. Participants (N = 138) were randomly assigned to read two conversations and rate target speakers (one male, one female). The conversations had neither, one, or both speakers using profanity and consisted of same- or mixed-gender dyads. The result is a 2 (target speaker, male/female) × 2 (dyad composition) × 3 (profanity) mixed design with speaker gender as the repeated measure. Speakers using profanity had poorer impression ratings on several variables, including overall impression, intelligence, and trustworthiness. Speakers swearing in mixed-gender dyads were rated as less sociable, and males swearing in mixed-gender dyads were rated as more offensive. Language choices matter, and more research is needed to understand the unconscious biases held against those who use profanity.
AcorA. A. (2001). Employers’ perceptions of persons with body art and an experimental test regarding eyebrow piercing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 3885.
2.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
3.
AschS. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
AthenstaedtU.HaasE.SchwabS. (2004). Gender role self-concept and gender-typed communication behavior in mixed-sex and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 50, 37-52.
5.
BaudhuinS. E. (1973). Obscene language and evaluative response: An empirical study. Psychological Reports, 32, 399-402.
6.
BayenU. J.KuhlmannB. G. (2011). Influences of source-item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring: Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 1-17.
7.
BergenB. (2016). What the f: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves. New York, NY: Basic Books.
8.
BrysonB. (1990). The mother tongue: English, and how it got that way. New York, NY: William Morrow.
9.
CanaryD. J.DindiaK. (Eds.). (2006). Sex differences and similarities in communication. Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interactions (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
ChaplinW. F.PhillipsJ. B.BrownJ. D.ClantonN. R.SteinJ. L. (2000). Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 110-117.
12.
DwyerH. (2010). Curriculum connections psychology: The individual and society. London, England: Brown Bear Books.
13.
FilardoE. K. (1996). Gender patterns in African American and White adolescents’ social interactions in same-race, mixed-gender groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 71-82.
14.
GoodaleG. (1998, April10). Mucking up movies in Hollywood. Christian Science Monitor, 90, B1.
15.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393-417.
16.
GrantA. M.MayerD. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 900-912.
17.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B.BowlerW. M.BolinoM. C.TurnleyW. H. (2010). Organizational concern, prosocial values, or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1450-1489.
18.
HalmeckJ.NollN.DeFrankM. (2017, March). Profanity, misogyny, and gender roles in mainstream rap and country music. Poster presented at 88th annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
19.
HamiltonM. A. (1989). Reactions to obscene language. Communication Research Reports, 6, 67-69.
20.
HancockA. B.StuttsH. W.BassA. (2015). Perceptions of gender and femininity based on language: Implications for transgender communication therapy. Language and Speech, 58, 315-333.
21.
HannahA.MurachverT. (1999). Gender and conversational style as predictors of conversational behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 153-174.
22.
HoltgravesT.SrullT. K. (1989). The effects of positive self-descriptives on impressions: General principles and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 452-462.
23.
HowellJ. L.GiulianoT. A. (2011). The effect of expletive use and team gender perceptions of coaching effectiveness. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 69-81.
24.
JacobiL. L. (2014). Perceptions of profanity: how race, gender, and profanity choice affect perceived offensiveness. North American Journal of Psychology, 16, 261-276.
25.
JayT.JanschewitzK. (2012). The science of swearing. Observer, 25, 21-42.
26.
JohnsonD. I.LewisN. (2010). Perceptions of swearing in the work setting: An expectancy violations theory perspective. Communication Reports, 23, 106-118.
KwonY.FarberA. (1992). Attitudes toward appropriate clothing in perception of occupational attributes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 163-168.
29.
LeaperC.AyresM. (2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 328-363.
30.
MartinR. (1997). “Girls don’t talk about garages!”: Perceptions of conversation in same- and cross-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 4, 115-130.
31.
MattarozziK.TodorovA.MarzocchiM.VicariA.RussoP. M. (2015). Effects of gender and personality on first impression. PLoS one, 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135529
32.
McCrumR.CranW.MacNeilR. (1986). The story of English. New York, NY: Viking.
33.
MorganB. L.KorschgenA. J. (2001). The ethics of faculty behavior: Students’ and professors’ view. College Student Journal, 35, 418-432.
34.
MoskowitzD. S. (1993). Dominance and friendliness: On the interaction of gender and situation. Journal of Personality, 61, 387-409.
ParadiseL. V.CohlB.ZweigJ. (1980). Effects of profane language and physical attractiveness on perceptions of counselor behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 620-624.
37.
PatrickG. (1901). The psychology of profanity. Psychological Review, 8, 113-127.
38.
RittsV.PattersonM.TubbsM. (1992). Expectations, impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413-426.
39.
RothwellJ. D. (1971). Verbal obscenity: Time for second thoughts. Western Speech, 35, 231-242.
40.
SelnowG. W. (1985). Sex differences in uses and perceptions of profanity. Sex Roles, 12, 303-312.
ThomkinsR.BoorM. (1980). Effects of students’ physical attractiveness and name popularity on teachers’ perceptions of social and academic attributes. Journal of Psychology, 106, 37-42.
43.
TodorovA. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208-224.
44.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language (KozulinA., Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
45.
WilliamsJ. E.MunickM. L.SaizJ. L.FormyDuvalD. L. (1995). Psychological importance of the “Big Five”: Impression formation and context effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 818-826.
46.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-Ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
47.
WolffhechelK.FagertunJ.JacobsenU. P.MajewskiW.HemmingsenA. S.LarsenC. L.. . . JarmerH. (2014). Interpretation of appearance: The effect of facial features on first impressions and personality. PLoS one, 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107721
48.
ZuckermanM.MiyakeK.ElkinC. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253-273.
