This study examined the role of social categorization in the language attitudes process. Participants (N = 1,915) from three ethnolinguistic groups residing in the republic of Georgia—Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis—listened to a speaker reading a text in a Tbilisi-accented (standard variety) and a Mingrelian-accented (nonstandard variety) Georgian guise. We predicted that the three groups would vary in their ability to correctly categorize the two guises and that this intergroup variation in categorization accuracy would result in intergroup variation in language attitudes. These hypotheses were supported. Georgians were more accurate than Armenians and Azerbaijanis in their categorization of both guises. The Tbilisi-accented (Mingrelian-accented) guise was evaluated more (less) favorably when categorized correctly than when miscategorized. This resulted in intergroup variation in language attitudes: Overall, Georgians evaluated the Tbilisi-accented (Mingrelian-accented) guise more (less) favorably than Armenians and Azerbaijanis, due in part to Georgians’ higher categorization accuracy of both guises.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (1987). Language attitudes, frames of reference, and social identity: A Scottish dimension. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 201-213.
2.
AryaD. J.McClungN. A.KatznelsonN.ScottL. (2015). Language ideologies and literacy achievement: Six multilingual countries and two international assessments. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 40-60.
3.
BayardD.WeatherallA.GalloisC.PittamJ. (2001). Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia, and America. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 22-49.
4.
BerglundC. (2016). “Forward to David the Builder!” Georgia’s (re)turn to language-centered nationalism. Nationalities Papers, 44, 522-542.
5.
BlauveltT. K.BerglundC. (2016). Armenians in the making of modern Georgia. In SiekierskiK.TroebstS. (Eds.), Armenians in post-socialist Europe (pp. 69-85). Cologne, Germany: Böhlau Verlag.
6.
BroersL. (2012). Two sons of one mother: Nested identities and centre-periphery politics in post-Soviet Georgia. In SchönleA.MakarovaO.HicksJ. (Eds.), When the elephant broke out of the zoo: A festschrift for Donald Rayfield (pp. 234-267). Stanford, CA: Berkeley Slavic Specialists.
7.
ClopperC. G.PisoniD. B. (2004a). Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 16, 31-48.
8.
ClopperC. G.PisoniD. B. (2004b). Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 111-140.
9.
ClopperC. G.PisoniD. B. (2007). Free classification of regional dialects of American English. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 421-438.
10.
CouplandN.BishopH. (2007). Ideologized values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 74-93.
11.
DaileyR. M.GilesH.JansmaL. L. (2005). Language attitudes in an Anglo-Hispanic context: The role of linguistic landscape. Language & Communication, 25, 27-38.
12.
DayR. R. (1980). The development of linguistic attitudes and preferences. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 27-37.
13.
DragojevicM. (2016). Language attitudes as intergroup terrain. In GilesH.MaassA. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 51-66). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
14.
DragojevicM.BerglundC.BlauveltT. K. (2015). Attitudes toward Tbilisi- and Mingrelian-accented Georgian among Georgian youth: On the road to linguistic homogenization?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 90-101.
15.
DragojevicM.GilesH. (2014). The reference frame effect: An intergroup perspective on language attitudes. Human Communication Research, 40, 91-111.
16.
DragojevicM.GilesH.WatsonB. (2013). Language ideologies and attitudes: A dynamic foundational framework. In GilesH.WatsonB. (Eds.), The social meanings of accents and dialects: An international perspective (pp. 1-25). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
17.
DriscollJ.BerglundC.BlauveltT. K. (2016). Language hierarchies in Georgia: An experimental approach. Caucasus Survey, 4, 44-62.
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
19.
FlocciaC.ButlerJ.GirardF.GoslinJ. (2009). Categorization of regional and foreign accent in 5- to 7-year-old British children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 366-375.
20.
FuertesJ. N.GottdienerW.MartinH.GilbertT. C.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 120-133.
21.
GarrettP. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
GilesH.BourhisR. Y.TaylorD. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In GilesH. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307-348). London, England: Academic Press.
25.
GilesH.BourhisR. Y.DaviesA. (1979). Prestige speech styles: The imposed norm and inherent value hypotheses. In McCormackW.WurmS. (Eds.), Language and society: Anthropological issues (pp. 589-596). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
26.
GilesH.BourhisR. Y.TrudgillP.LewisA. (1974). The imposed norm hypothesis: A validation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 405-410.
27.
GilesH.HarrisonC.CreberC.SmithP. M.FreemanN. H. (1983). Developmental and contextual aspects of children’s language attitudes. Language & Communication, 3, 141-146.
28.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69-99.
29.
GilesH.MarshP. (1979). Perceived masculinity, androgyny and accented speech. Language Sciences, 1, 301-315.
30.
GilesH.NiedzielskiN. (1998). Italian is beautiful, German is ugly. In BauerL.TrudgillP. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 85-93). London, England: Penguin.
31.
GilesH.SassoonC. (1983). The effect of speaker’s accent, social class background and message style on British listeners’ social judgments. Language and Communication, 3, 305-313.
32.
GilesH.WatsonB. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
33.
GirardF.FlocciaC.GoslinJ. (2008). Perception and awareness of accents in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 409-433.
34.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.CorrellJ. (2010). Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 581-592.
35.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.DeJesusJ.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Accents trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27, 623-634.
36.
LambertW. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91-109.
37.
LambertW. E.FrankelH.TuckerG. R. (1966). Judging personality through speech: A French-Canadian example. Journal of Communication, 16, 305-321.
38.
LambertW. E.HodgsonR. C.GardnerR. C.FillenbaumS. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44-51.
39.
LandryR.BourhisR. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23-49.
40.
LindemannS. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 348-364.
41.
LuhmanR. (1990). Appalachian English stereotypes: Language attitudes in Kentucky. Language in Society, 19, 331-348.
42.
McKenzieR. M. (2008). The role of variety recognition in Japanese university students’ attitudes towards English speech varieties. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 29, 139-153.
43.
McKenzieR. M. (2015). The sociolinguistics of variety identification and categorisation: Free classification of varieties of spoken English amongst non-linguistic listeners. Language Awareness, 24, 150-168.
44.
MilroyJ.MilroyL. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating standard English (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
PrestonD. R. (1999). A language attitude approach to the perception of regional variety. In PrestonD. R. (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (Vol. 1, pp. 359- 373). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
46.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 16-29.
47.
RubinD. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511-531.
48.
RyanE. B. (1983). Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 148-159.
49.
RyanE. B.GilesH.SebastianR. J. (1982). An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In RyanE. B.GilesH. (Eds.), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 1-19). London, England: Edward Arnold.
50.
ShohamyE.GorterD. (Eds.). (2009). Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
ShostedR. K.ChikovaniV. (2006). Standard Georgian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36, 255-264.
52.
St. ClairR. N. (1982). From social history to language attitudes. In RyanE. B.GilesH. (Eds.), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 164-174). London, England: Edward Arnold.
53.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering social groups: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
54.
WoolardK. A. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist, 12, 738-748.
55.
WilliamsA.GarrettP.CouplandN. (1999). Dialect recognition. In PrestonD. R. (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. 345-358). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
56.
YookC.LindemannS. (2013). The role of speaker identification in Korean university students’ attitudes towards five varieties of English. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 34, 279-296.
