Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two prominent theories of alignment (priming and grounding) are tested in human–human text-only computer interactions. In two experiments, dyads of strangers and dyads of friends conducted conversations using Instant Messenger. These conversations were either neutral in nature or interlocutors were told to disagree on a particular topic. Conversations were assessed for paralinguistic, linguistic, semantic, affective, and typographical alignment. Results show distinct differences in alignment patterns dependent on conversational dynamics. Grounding theory is supported and discussion includes examining how nonverbal cues are translated into text-only conversation.

Keywords

alignment computer-mediated communication coordination grounding priming synchronization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

(1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204. doi:10.1017/S004740450001037X

Bock

J. K.

(1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6

Branigan

H. P.

Pearson

(2006). Alignment in human-computer interaction. In Fischer

(Ed.), How people talk to computers, robots, and other artificial communication partners (pp. 140-156; Report Series of the Transregional Collaborative Research Center SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition). Bremen, Germany: Universitaet Bremen.

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Cleland

A. A.

(2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13-B25. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Pearson

McLean

J. F.

Nass

C. I.

(2003, July-August). Syntactic alignment between computers and people: The role of belief about mental states. Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA.

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Pearson

McLean

J. F.

Nass

C. I.

(2004, March). Beliefs about mental states in lexical and syntactic alignment: Evidence from human-computer dialogs. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, College Park, MD.

Brenner

Smith

(2013). 72% of online adults are social networking site users. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/social-networking-sites.aspx

Bunz

Campbell

S. W.

(2004). Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports, 21, 11-25. doi:10.1080/08824090409359963

Burgoon

J. K.

(1985). Nonverbal signals. In Knapp

M. L.

Miller

G. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344-392). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.

Byron

Baldridge

(2005). Toward a model of nonverbal cues and emotion in email. In Weaver

K. M.

(Ed.), Academy of Management best papers. Proceedings of the Academy of Management annual meeting, Organizational communication and information systems division (pp. B1-B6). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Pace University. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2005.18781269

11.

Carey

(1980). Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. In Sondheimer

N. K.

(Ed.), The 18th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and parasession on topics in interactive discourse: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 67-69). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. doi:10.3115/981436.981458

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Vaccines and preventable diseases: HPV vaccination. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/hpv/default.htm.

13.

Clark

H. H.

Brennan

S. A.

(1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick

L. B.

Levine

J. M.

Teasley

S. D.

(Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA Books.

14.

Cleland

A. A.

Pickering

M. J.

(2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 214-230. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00060-3

15.

Colgrove

(2006). The ethics and politics of compulsory HPV vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 2389-2391. doi:10.1056/NEJMp068248

16.

Cramton

C. D.

(2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098

17.

Derks

Bos

A. E. R.

von Grumbkow

(2008). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 99-101. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9926

18.

Dino

Reysen

Branscombe

N. R.

(2009). Online interactions between group members who differ in status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 85-93. doi:10.1177/0261927X08325916

19.

Ferreira

V. S.

Bock

(2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011-1029. doi:10.1080/01690960600824609

20.

Gabrilovich

Markovitch

(2007). Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1606-1611). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

21.

Giles

Coupland

(1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles

Coupland

(Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Gill

French

R. M.

Gergle

Oberlander

(2008). Emotion rating from short blog texts. Proceedings of CHI 2008 (pp. 1121-1124). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357229

23.

Harris

R. B.

Paradice

(2007). An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotion. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 2081-2090.

24.

Issacs

E. A.

Clark

H. H.

(1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.26

25.

Jarvenpaa

S. L.

Knoll

Leidner

D. E.

(1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-64.

26.

Lenhart

(2012). Teens, smartphones, and texting. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx

27.

Lenhart

Purcell

Smith

Zickuhr

(2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/social-media-and-young-adults.aspx

28.

Liu

Y. L.

Ginther

Zelhart

(2002). An exploratory study of the effects of frequency and duration of messaging on impression development in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 73-80. doi:10.1177/089443930202000107

29.

(2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 595-597. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0132

30.

Madden

Rainie

(2003). America’s online pursuits. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2003/Americas-Online-Pursuits.aspx

31.

Marsh

K. L.

Richardson

M. J.

Schmidt

R. C.

(2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 320-339. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x

32.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Booth

R. J.

Francis

M. E.

(2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.

33.

Pickering

M. J.

Garrod

(2004). The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 212-225. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04450055

34.

Rainie

Horrigan

Wellman

Boase

(2006). The strength of Internet ties. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Strength-of-Internet-Ties.aspx

35.

Rice

R. E.

Love

(1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108. doi:10.1177/009365087014001005

36.

Rintel

E. S.

Pittam

(1997). Strangers in a strange land: Interaction management on Internet Relay Chat. Human Communication Research, 23, 507-534. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00408.x

37.

Riordan

M. A.

Dale

Kreuz

R. J.

Olney

(2011). Evidence for alignment in a computer-mediated text-only environment. In Carlson

Hoelscher

Shipley

T. F.

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2411-2416). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

38.

Riordan

M. A.

Markman

K. M.

Stewart

C. O.

(2013). Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 84-95. doi:10.1177/0261927X12462695

39.

Roche

J. M.

Dale

Caucci

G. M.

(2012). Doubling up on double meanings: Pragmatic alignment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1-24. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.509929

40.

Rohde

D. L. T.

Gonnerman

L. M.

Plaut

D. C.

(2005). An improved model of semantic similarity based on lexical co-occurrence. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.cmu.edu/~plaut/papers/pdf/RohdeGonnermanPlautSUB-CogSci.COALS.pdf

41.

Scissors

L. E.

Gill

A. J.

Geraghty

Gergle

(2009). In CMC we trust: The role of similarity. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2009 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 527-536). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518783

42.

Shockley

Santana

Fowler

C. A.

(2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326-332. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326

43.

Smith

M. C.

Wheeldon

L. R.

(2001). Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition, 78, 123-164. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00110-4

44.

Street

R. L.

(2006). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139-169. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x

45.

The Radicati Group. (2011). Email statistics report, 2011-2015. Retrieved from http://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Email-Statistics-Report-2011-2015-Executive-Summary.pdf

46.

Utz

(2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1). Retrieved from http://old.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html

47.

Walther

J. B.

(1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003

48.

Walther

J. B.

Bunz

(2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828-846. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x

49.

Walther

J. B.

D’Addario

K. P.

(2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324-347. doi:10.1177/089443930101900307

50.

Walther

J. B.

Loh

Granka

(2005). Let me count the ways: Verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65. doi:10.1177/0261927X04273036

Alignment Is a Function of Conversational Dynamics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References