This article presents a cognitive–cultural model (CC model) of situational, dispositional, and motivational factors affecting gender-associational responses to lexical expressions concerning people. It is argued that the mind is trained to perceive gender as an indispensable human feature. When decoding the meaning of a message, it will search for cues of gender, usually prioritizing the semantic content. When gender is not clearly specified, the mind attempts to plausibly reconstruct missing data by referring to indirect extrasemantic cues. This often occurs beyond conscious recognition. Lexical cues are strongly influential owing to their direct association with semantic gender-specific meaning. Gender-associational dispositions resulting from cognitive training also affect the response. This article discusses cognitive training’s cultural, gender-related, and individual components, along with dispositional and incidental factors, affecting motivation to consciously authorize and/or alter the initial automatic response.
AmareN. (2007). Where is she? Gender occurrences in online grammar guides. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 163-187.
2.
BarghJ. A.PietromonacoP. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
3.
BemS.BemD. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6-18.
4.
BojarskaK. (2011). Wpływ androcentrycznych i inkluzywnych płciowo konstrukcji językowych na skojarzenia z płcią. [The influence of androcentric and gender-inclusive lexical constructions on gender associations.] Studia Psychologiczne, 49, 53-68.
5.
BradshawJ.CleggS.TrayhurnD. (1995). An investigation into gender bias in educational software used in English primary schools. Gender and Education, 7, 167-174.
6.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
7.
BraunF.SczesnyS.StahlbergD. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 30, 1-21.
8.
CralleyE. L.RuscherJ. B. (2005). Lady, girl, female, or woman: Sexism and cognitive busyness predict use of gender-biased nouns. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 300-314.
9.
CrawfordM.EnglishL. (1981, April). Sex differences in recall as a function of “generic” vs. female-inclusive contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
10.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
11.
DunningD.ShermanD. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459-471.
12.
DyrudM. A. (1997). An exploration of gender bias in computer clip art. Business Communication Quarterly, 60, 30-51.
13.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation (John M. MacEachran Memorial Lecture Series; 1985). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
ErnstS. B. (1995). Gender issues in books for children and young adults. In LehrS. (Ed.), Battling dragons: Issues and controversy in childreńs literature (pp. 66-78). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194.
16.
FiskeS. T. (2004). Intent and ordinary bias: Unintended thought and social motivation create casual prejudice. Social Justice Research, 17, 117-127.
17.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Fuertes-OliveraP. A. (2007). A corpus-based view of lexical gender in written business English. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 219-234.
19.
GabrielU.MellenbergerF. (2004). Exchanging the generic masculine for gender-balanced forms: The impact of context valence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 273-278.
20.
GarzaR. T.HerringerL. G. (1987). Social identity: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 299.
21.
GygaxP.GabrielU. (2008). Can a group of musicians be composed of women? Generic interpretation of French masculine role names in the absence and presence of feminine forms. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 143-151.
22.
GygaxP.GabrielU.SarrasinO.OakhillJ.GarnhamA. (2009). Some grammatical rules are more difficult than others: The case of the generic interpretation of the masculine. European Journal of Psychology of Education—EJPE (Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada), 24, 235-246.
23.
HamiltonM. C. (1991). Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 393-402.
24.
HamiltonM. C.AndersonD.BroaddusM.YoungK. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular childreńs picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 55, 757-765.
25.
HamiltonM. C.HunterB.Stuart-SmithS. (1992). Jury instructions worded in the masculine generic: Can a woman claim self-defense when “he” is threatened? In ChrislerJ. C.HowardD. (Eds.), New directions in feminist psychology: Practice, theory, and research (Vol. 13, pp. 169-178). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
HigginsE. T.BarghJ. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
27.
HigginsE. T.BarghJ. A.LombardiW. J. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59-69.
28.
HydeJ. S. (1984). Childreńs understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697-706.
29.
IrmenL. (2007). What’s in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 431-456.
30.
KarlinsM.CoffmanT. L.WaltersG. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1-16.
31.
KatzD.BralyK. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
32.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
33.
LegaultL.Green-DemersI.EadieA. (2009). When internalization leads to automatization: The role of self-determination in automatic stereotype suppression and implicit prejudice regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 10-24.
34.
MacKayD. G.FulkersonD. C. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661-673.
35.
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
MoultonJ.RobinsonG. M.EliasC. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that areńt. American Psychologist, 33, 1032-1036.
38.
Mucchi-FainaA. (2005). Visible or influential? Language reforms and gender (in)equality. Social Science Information, 44, 189-215.
39.
PattM. B.McBrideB. A. (1993, April). Gender equity in picture books in preschool classrooms: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association American Educational Research, Atlanta, GA.
40.
SchneiderW.ShiffrinR. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
41.
ShiffrinR. M.SchneiderW. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
42.
StahlbergD.BraunF.IrmenL.SczesnyS. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 163-187). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
43.
SwimJ. K.MallettR.StangorC. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51, 117-128.
44.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105-110.
45.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
