This article reports two experiments exploring heterosexual men’s use of homophobic slang in social contexts varied by sex ratio. Study 1 (N = 127) experimentally demonstrated that compared with a mixed-sex audience, heterosexual men with an all-male audience reported higher levels of hetero-identity concern (HIC) and more homophobic slang use. These men had similar levels of HIC compared with men with an all-female audience. Study 2 replicated Study 1’s mean difference tests and explored whether the relationship between HIC and homophobic slang was affected by group sex ratio and social norms. Results suggest the relationship between HIC and homophobic slang was significant only in all-male and mixed-sex audiences and the norm of noninterference was associated with homophobic slang only in all-male groups.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (2004). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 147-181). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
BahnsA. J.BranscombeN. R. (2011). Effects of legitimizing discrimination against homosexuals on gay bashing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 388-396. doi:10.1002/ejsp.784
3.
BossonJ. K.Prewitt-FreilinoJ. L.TaylorJ. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552-565. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552
4.
BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.EllemersN.DoosjeB. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-752. doi:10.1177/0146167202289004
5.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
6.
CoatesJ. (2003). Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Falomir-PichastorJ. M.MugnyG. (2009). “I’m not gay . . . I’m a real man!” Heterosexual men’s gender self-esteem and sexual prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1233-1243. doi:10.1177/0146167209338072
8.
FloydK. (2000). Affectionate same-sex touch: Understanding the influence of homophobia on observers’ interpretations of perceptions. Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 774-788. doi:10.1080/00224540009600516
9.
HallJ. A. (2011, February). All-male group membership and context: Gender threat, hetero-identity concern, and homophobic talk. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Conference, Monterey, CA.
10.
HallJ. A.La FranceB. H. (2007). Attitudes and communication of homophobia in fraternities: Separating the impact of social adjustment function from hetero-identity concern. Communication Quarterly, 55, 39-60. doi:10.1080/01463370600998673
11.
HallJ. A.La FranceB. H. (2012). “That’s gay!” Predicting homophobic communication. Communication Quarterly, 60, 35-58. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.641833
12.
HerekG. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 12-22. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00051
13.
HerekG. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 905-925. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x
14.
HewstoneM.RubinM.WillisH. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
15.
HoggM. A.ReidS. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
16.
KilianskiS. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men’s attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 37-56. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.37
17.
KimmelM. S. (2003). Masculinity as homophobia. In KimmelM. S.FerberA. L. (Eds.), Privilege: A reader (pp. 51-74). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
LalorT.Rendle-ShortJ. (2007). “That’s so gay!” A contemporary use of gay in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 27, 147-173. doi:10.1080/07268600701522764
19.
LoftusJ. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762-782. doi:10.2307/3088957
20.
MoradiB.van den BergJ. J.EptingF. R. (2006). Intrapersonal and interpersonal manifestations of antilesbian and gay prejudice: An application of personal construct theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 57-66. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.57
21.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22.
PascoeC. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
ReidS. A.GilesH.HarwoodJ. (2005). A prospectus for the study of communication and intergroup relations. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 241-263). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototpyicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510-517. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
25.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793. doi:10.1177/0146167296228002
26.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (2001). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 253-270). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
27.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell
30.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2001). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In BrownR.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Intergroup processes (pp. 133-152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2009). Gender identity. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109-125). New York, NY: Guilford.
32.
YepG. A. (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, and queer world-making. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 11-59. doi:10.1300/J082v45n02_02
