According to Gibbs and Colston, one of the biggest challenges for irony research is the uncovering of the various ways in which irony is used in discourse. This article takes up a genre-based approach to deal with this research challenge. In a content analysis of ironic utterances from six written genres (commercial and noncommercial advertisements, columns, cartoons, letters to the editor, book and film reviews), ironic utterances are compared on the usage of irony factors and irony markers. Results indicate that every genre in the corpus differs from the general distribution for at least one irony factor and one category of irony markers. Taken together, the clustering of irony factors and markers in specific genres is a first step toward identifying the various ways in which verbal irony is used differently across various genres.
AttardoS. (2000a). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask, 12, 3-20.
2.
AttardoS. (2000b). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793-826.
3.
AttardoS.EisterholdJ.HayJ.PoggiI. (2003). Visual markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor, 16, 243-260.
4.
BarbeK. (1995). Irony in context. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
5.
BerntsenD.KennedyJ. (1996). Unresolved contradictions specifying attitudes: In metaphor, irony, understatement and tautology. Poetics, 24, 13-29.
6.
BiberD. (1993). The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities, 26, 331-345.
7.
BlassR. (1990). Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BoscoF. M.BucciarelliM. (2008). Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 583-607.
9.
BryantG. A.Fox TreeJ. E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 99-117.
10.
BurgersC.Van MulkenM.SchellensP. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 186-205.
11.
BurgersC.Van MulkenM.SchellensP. J. (2012). Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 231-242.
12.
CapelliG. (2008). Expats’ talk: Humour and irony in an expatriate’s travel blog. Textus, 21, 9-26.
13.
DedaicM. N. (2005). Ironic denial: Tobože in Croatian political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 667-683.
14.
DewsS.WinnerE. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. In MandellC.McCabeA. (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 377-414). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
15.
DressM. L.KreuzR. J.LinkK. E.CaucciG. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 71-85.
16.
EllisJ. (2006). Statistiek voor de psychologie: GLM en non-parametrische toetsen [Statistics for psychology: GLM and non-parametric tests]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Uitgeverij Boom.
FilipovaE.AstingtonJ. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development, 79, 126-138.
19.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3-15.
20.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5-27.
21.
GibbsR. W.Jr.ColstonH. L. (2007). The future of irony studies. In GibbsR. W.Jr.ColstonH. L. (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 581-595). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
GioraR. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239-264.
23.
GioraR. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
GriceH. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In ColeP. (Ed.), Pragmatics: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 9, pp. 113-127). New York, NY: Academic Press.
25.
HaimanJ. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26.
HancockJ. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 447-463.
27.
HoekenH.SwanepoelP.SaalE. O.JansenC. J. M. (2009). Using message form to stimulate conversations: The case of tropes. Communication Theory, 19, 49-65.
28.
HutcheonL. (1994). Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London, England: Routledge.
29.
IvankoS. L.PexmanP. M.OlineckK. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 244-271.
30.
JorgensenJ. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 613-634.
31.
JorgensenJ.MillerG. A.SperberD. (1984). Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112-120.
32.
KotthoffH. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1387-1411.
33.
KreuzR. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In MioJ. S.KatzA. N. (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 23-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
KreuzR. J.CaucciG. M. (2007). Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. In Proceedings of workshop on computational approaches to figurative language (pp. 1-4). Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics.
35.
KreuzR. J.LinkK. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 127-143.
36.
KreuzR. J.RobertsR. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 21-31.
37.
MatthewsJ. K.HancockJ. T.DunhamP. J. (2006). The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 41, 3-24.
38.
MueckeD. C. (1978). Irony markers. Poetics, 7, 363-375.
39.
MyersG. (1990). The rhetoric of irony in academic writing. Written Communication, 7, 419-455.
40.
PelsmaekersK.Van BesienF. (2002). Subtitling irony: Blackadder in Dutch. The Translator, 8, 241-266.
41.
PexmanP. M.WhalenJ. M.GreenJ. J. (2010). Understanding verbal irony: Clues from interpretation of direct and indirect ironic remarks. Discourse Processes, 47, 237-261.
42.
PoggiI.CavicchioF.CaldognettoE. M. (2007). Irony in a judicial debate: Analyzing the subtleties of irony while testing the subtleties of an annotation scheme. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41, 215-232.
43.
PoggiI.D’ErricoF. (2010). Dominance signals in debates. Human Behavior Understanding: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6219, 163-174.
44.
RitchieD. (2005). Frame-shifting in humor and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 275-294.
45.
SchwoebelJ.DewsS.WinnerE.SrinivasK. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 47-61.
46.
SetoK.-I. (1998). On non-echoic irony. In CarstonR.UchidaS. (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 239-255). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
47.
SteenG. J. (1999). Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes, 28, 109-120.
48.
Van MulkenM.BurgersC.Van der PlasB. (2011). Wolves, confederates and the happy few: The influence of comprehension, agreement and target on the appreciation of irony. Discourse Processes, 48, 50-68.
49.
WeizmanE. (2001). Addresser, addressee and target: Negotiating roles through ironic criticism. In WeigandE.DascalM. (Eds.), Negotiation and power in dialogic interaction (pp. 125-137). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
50.
WhalenJ. M.PexmanP. M.GillA. J. (2009). “Should be fun—not!” Incidence and marking of nonliteral language in e-mail. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 263-280.
51.
WhalenJ. M.PexmanP. M.GillA. J.NowsonS. (in press). Verbal irony use in personal blogs. Behavior and Information Technology.
52.
WilsonD.SperberD. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53-76.
53.
WimmerR. D.DominickJ. R. (1987). Mass media research: An introduction (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
