Tone of voice has been characterized as a cue to sarcasm. However, researchers have found conflicting evidence regarding the acoustic properties of the sarcastic tone of voice and what social factors may affect their prevalence. The current project was designed to assess whether there is a sarcastic tone of voice employed in naturalistic conversation and if it varies as a function of shared common ground. Participants were recorded in a conversational setting while engaged in tasks designed to elicit sarcasm. Results showed that spontaneous sarcastic statements had more varied pitch, lower mean amplitude, and less varied amplitude, and were spoken more slowly than literal statements that were matched by syllables and stress. In addition, friends marked their sarcasm to a greater degree compared to strangers with regard to mean F0, mean amplitude, and amplitude variability.
AnolliL.CiceriR.InfantinoM. G. (2000). Irony as a game of implicitness: Acoustic profiles of ironic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(3), 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005100221723
2.
AnolliL.CiceriR.InfantinoM. G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology, 37(5), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590244000106
3.
AnolliL.InfantinoM. G.CiceriR. (2001). You’re a real genius!:” Irony as a miscommunication design. In AnolliL.CiceriR.RivaG. (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 142–163). IOS Press.
4.
AttardoS. (2000). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask. Internationalt Tidsskrift for Sprog og Kommunikation, 12(1), 3–20.
CaucciG. M.KreuzR. J. (2009, July). Creating illusory irony [Paper presentation]. Society for Text and Discourse 19th Annual Meeting, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
ClarkH. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
10.
CoatesL. J. (1991). A collaborative theory of inversion: Irony in dialogue [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Victoria.
11.
CutlerA. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In GalyM.FoxR.BruckA. (Eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting, Chicago linguistic society (pp. 117–127). CLS.
12.
DressM. L.KreuzR. J.LinkK. E.CaucciG. M. (2008). Regional variation in the spontaneous use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309512
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
14.
GibbsR. W. (1994). Figurative thought and figurative language. In GernsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 411–446). Academic Press.
Goldman-EislerF. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.
17.
HaimanJ. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. Oxford University Press.
18.
HancockJ. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269587
19.
KnoxN. (1961). The word irony and its context, 1500–1755. Duke University Press.
20.
KöderF.FalkumI. L. (2021). Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 624604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
21.
KreuzR. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In MioJ. S.KatzA. N. (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 23–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
KreuzR. J.KasslerM. A.CoppenrathL.McLain AllenB. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1685–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00010-7
23.
KreuzR. J.RobertsR. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3
24.
Kumon-NakamuraS.GlucksbergS.BrownM. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3
MauchandM.VergisN.PellM. D. (2018, June 13–16). Ironic tones of voices. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Poznań, Poland (pp. 443–447). https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-90
27.
MilenkovicP. (2001). TF32 [Computer software]. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
28.
PetersS.WilsonK.BoiteauT. W.Gelormini-LezamaC.AlmorA. (2015). Do you hear it now? A native advantage for sarcasm processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000048
RockwellP. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120109296
31.
RockwellP.TheriotE. M. (2001). Culture, gender, and gender mix in encoders of sarcasm: A self-assessment analysis. Communication Research Reports, 18(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384781
32.
University of Memphis Office of Institutional Research (2024, January 9). OIR census enrollment [Headcount by year and student origin].http://bit.ly/4b7Z3yv.
VoyerD.ThibodeauS.-H.DelongB. J. (2016). Context, contrast, and tone of voice in auditory sarcasm perception. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9323-5
35.
WilsonD.SperberD. (2012). Explaining irony. In WilsonD.SperberD. (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge University Press.
ZhuN.FilikR. (2023). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001227
