This research investigated whether variations in speech rate and response latency provide cues for deception. Participants listened to a conversation between a male/ female couple containing responses to questions that not only varied in timing characteristics but also potential type of lie. Results revealed gender differences in the type of lie told that depended on speech timing characteristics.
Baskett, G., & Freedle, R. ( 1972). Aspects of language and the social perception of lying . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 117-131.
2.
Boltz, M.G. ( 2005). Temporal dimensions of conversational interaction: The role of response latencies and pauses in social impression formation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 103-138.
3.
DePaulo, B.M., & Kashy, D.A. ( 1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.
4.
DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E., Wyer, M.M., & Epstein, J.A. ( 1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
5.
DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. ( 2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin , 129, 74-118.
6.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. ( 1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence . In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Greene, J.O., O’Hair, H.D., Cody, M.J., & Yen, C. ( 1985). Planning and control of behavior during deception. Human Communication Research, 11, 335-364.
8.
Grice, H.P. ( 1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
MacGeorge, E.L., Gillihan, S.J., Samter, W., & Clark, R.A. ( 2003). Skill deficit or differential motivation? Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support . Communication Research, 30, 272-303.
10.
Maltz, D.N., & Borker, R.A. ( 1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumprez (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196-216). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
McCornack, S.A., & Levine, T.R. ( 1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs , 57, 219-230.
12.
Siegman, A.W., & Boyle, S. ( 1993). Voices of fear and anxiety and sadness and depression: The effects of speech rate and loudness on fear and anxiety and sadness and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 430-437.
13.
Street, R.L., & Brady, R.M. ( 1982). Speech rate acceptance range as a function of evaluative domain. Communication Monographs, 49, 290-308.
14.
Tannen, D. ( 1990). You just don’t understand. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
15.
Walczyk, J.J., Roper, K.S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A.M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755-774.
16.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. ( 1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York, NY: Academic Press.
