The aim of this study was to examine the effects of single (e.g., “Turks”) and dual ethnic minority labels (“Turkish Dutch”) on the attitude of (Dutch) majority group members. Following the dual identity version of the common in-group identity model, it was predicted that attitudes will be more positive toward minority groups that are described with dual labels compared with single labels. In addition, it was expected that the effect of labeling on out-group attitudes will be stronger for participants who endorse multiculturalism.The findings are in agreement with these different predictions, but alternative interpretations are discussed. The results show the importance of labeling in interethnic relations.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Thousand Oaks, CA, US: SAGE.
2.
Allport, G.W. ( 1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Arends-Tóth, J., & Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249-266.
4.
Benet-Martinez, V. (in press). Multiculturalism: Cultural, social and personality processes . In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
Berry, J.W. ( 2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697-712.
6.
Berry, J.W., & Kalin, R. ( 1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada. An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 301-320.
7.
Billig, M. ( 2002). Henri Tajfel’s "cognitive aspects of prejudice" and the psychology of bigotry. British Journal of Social Psychology , 41, 171-188.
8.
Brewer, M.B. ( 1997). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Can research inform practice. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 197-211.
9.
Brewer, M.B., & Brown, R. ( 1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 554-593). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Brown, R. ( 2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology , 30, 745-778.
11.
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. ( 2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Brug, P., & Verkuyten, M. ( 2007). Dealing with cultural diversity: The endorsement of societal models among ethnic minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Youth & Society, 39, 112-131.
13.
Carnaghi, A., & Maass, A. ( 2007). In-group and out-group perspectives in the use of derogatory group labels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 142-156.
14.
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & Arcuri, L. ( 2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 839-859.
15.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Crisp, R.J., & Hewstone, M. ( 2007). Multiple social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 163-254.
17.
Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Saguy, T. ( 2007). Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology , 18, 296-330.
18.
Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of "we": Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 13, 3-20.
19.
Gaertner, S.J., & Dovidio, J.F. ( 2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
20.
Gónzalez, R., & Brown, R.J. ( 2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
21.
Hagendoorn, L. ( 1995). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 199-228). Chichester, England: Wiley.
22.
Hartmann, D., & Gerties, J. ( 2005). Dealing with diversity: Mapping multiculturalism in sociological terms. Sociological Theory, 23, 218-240.
23.
Hewstone, M., & Brown, R.J. ( 1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "contact hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
24.
Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
25.
Modood, T. ( 2007). Multiculturalism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
26.
Owen, C., Eisner, H., & McFaul, T. (1981). A half-century of social distance research: National replication of the Bogardus studies. Sociology and Social Research, 66, 80-98.
27.
Parekh, B. ( 2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. London, England: Macmillan .
28.
Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. ( 2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
29.
Social and Cultural Planning Office. (2005 ). Jaarrapport integratie 2005 [Annual report integration 2005] . The Hague, Netherlands: Author .
30.
Turner, T. ( 1993). Anthropology and multiculturalism: What is anthropology that multiculturalists should be mindful of it? Cultural Anthropology , 8, 411-429.
31.
Verkuyten, M. ( 2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121-138.
32.
Verkuyten, M., & Kinket, B. ( 2000). Social distances in a multi ethnic society: The ethnic hierarchy among Dutch preadolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly , 63, 75-85.
33.
Wolsko, C., Park, B., & Judd, C. ( 2006). Considering the tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277-306.
