This study investigated cultural differences in apology intentions moderated by the threatened face type and the relationship between interactants. With Chinese and U.S. undergraduate participants, this study revealed that (a) offending acts were more face-threatening toward a stranger than toward a friend; (b) apology intention was stronger for a stranger than for a friend; (c) for threatening negative face, Americans had stronger apology intentions than did Chinese, whereas for threatening positive face, Chinese had stronger apology intentions than did Americans; (d) situational variations in negative and positive face threats significantly related to apology intentions; and (e) Americans' apology intention, compared with Chinese, was more strongly related to amount of negative face threat in each act.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton-Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Barnlund, D.C., & Yoshioka, M. (1990). Apologies: Japanese andAmerican styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 193-206.
4.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cupach, W.R., & Imahori, T.T. (1993). Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese andAmerican facework. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 431-444.
6.
Cupach, W.R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
7.
Guan, X., & Park, H.S. (2005, November). A China-U.S. cross-cultural comparison in apology. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Boston.
8.
Gudykunst, W.B., Yoon, Y.C., & Nishida, T. (1987). The influence of individualism-collectivism on perceptions of communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships. Communication Monographs, 54, 295-306.
9.
Haley, J.O. (1998). Apology and pardon: Learning from Japan. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 842-867.
10.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Kim, J.Y., & Nam, S.H. (1998). The concept and dynamics of face: Implications for organizational behavior in Asia. Organization Science , 9, 522-534.
12.
Knapp, M., Ellis, D., & Williams, B. (1980). Perceptions of communication behaviors associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 45, 262-278.
13.
Levine, T.R., Park, H.S., & Kim, R.K. (2007). Some conceptual and theoretical challenges for cross-cultural communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 205-221.
14.
Lim, T.S. (1990). Politeness behavior in social influence situations . In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 75-86). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
15.
Lim, T.S., & Bowers, J.W. (1991). Facework solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
16.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
17.
Oetzel, J.G., Ting-Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T., & Takai, J. (2000). A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers. Communication Quarterly , 48, 397-419.
18.
Olshtain, E. (1989). Apologies across languages. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House , & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 155-173). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses . Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
20.
Park, H.S., & Guan, X. (2006). The effects of national culture and face concerns on intention to apologize: A comparison of USA and China. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35, 183-204.
21.
Park, H.S., Lee, H.E., & Song, J.A. (2005). "I am sorry to send you SPAM": Cross-cultural differences in use of apologies in email advertising in Korea and USA. Human Communication Research, 31, 365-398.
22.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Sharkey, W.F. (1992). Use and responses to intentional embarrassment . Communication Studies, 43, 257-275.
24.
Sharkey, W.F. (1993). Who embarrasses whom? Relational and sex differences in the use of intentional embarrassment. In P. Kalbfleish (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 147-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.). European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1-34). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
26.
Sugimoto, N. (1997). A Japan-U.S. comparison of apology styles. Communication Research, 24, 349-369.
27.
Sugimoto, N. (1998). Norms of apology depicted in U.S. American and Japanese literature on manners and etiquette. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 251-276.
28.
Suzuki, S. (1998). In-group and out-group communication patterns in international organizations: Implications for social identity theory. Communication Research, 25, 154-182.
29.
Tanaka, N., Spencer-Oatey, H., & Cray, E. (2000). "It's not my fault!" Japanese and English responses to unfounded accusations. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 75-97). New York: Continuum .
30.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187-225.
32.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CL: Westview.
33.
Wagatsuma, H., & Rosett, A. (1986). The implications of apology: Law and culture in Japan and the United States. Law and Society Review, 20, 461-498.
34.
Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249-268.
35.
Yuki, M., Maddux, W.W., Brewer, M.B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 31, 48-62.
