This experiment examined how online support-seeking messages containing anticipatory apology and/or appreciation influence support provision in the U.S. and Korea. The mediating role of regard for face was also assessed. A total of 983 participants (568 in the U.S. sample, 415 in the Korean sample) read and responded to support-seeking messages posted on an interactive online platform. Results showed that support-seeking messages with anticipatory apology and/or appreciation elicited higher quality (in terms of person-centeredness) supportive messages than support-seeking messages without anticipatory apology or appreciation. Participants’ perceptions of support-seeker's regard for face mediated the effect of anticipatory apology in support-seeking messages on level of person-centeredness in received support messages. This pattern of findings was observed in both the American and Korean samples.
AakhusM.RumseyE. (2010). Crafting supportive communication online: A communication design analysis of conflict in an online support group. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 65–84. http://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483581
2.
AliK.FarrerL.GulliverA.GriffithsK. M. (2015). Online peer-to-peer support for young people with mental health problems: A systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 2(2), e19. http://doi.org/10.2196/mental.4418
3.
ApplegateJ. L. (1980). Adaptive communication in educational contexts: A study of teachers’ communicative strategies. Communication Education, 29(2), 158–170. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634528009378407
4.
BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook, 18(1), 381–413. http://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1995.11678921
5.
BodieG. D.BurlesonB. R.Gill-RosierJ.McCulloughJ. D.HolmstromA. J.RackJ. J.HanasonoL.MincyJ. (2010). Explaining the impact of attachment style on evaluations of supportive messages: A dual-process framework. Communication Research, 38(2), 228–247. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362678
6.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BurlesonB. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1578–1588. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep8588469
8.
BurlesonB. R. (1994). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In DalyJ. A.WiemannJ. M. (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 135–161). Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
BurlesonB. R. (2007). Constructivism: A general theory of communication skill. In WhaleyB.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 105–128). Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
BurlesonB. R. (2008). What counts as effective emotional support. In MotleyM. T. (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 207–227). Sage.
11.
BurlesonB. R. (2009). Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 21–38. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509105519
12.
BurlesonB. R. (2003b). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 1–23. http://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00033
13.
BurlesonB. R. (2003a). Emotional support skills. In GreeneJ. O.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551–594). Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
BurlesonB. R.MortensonS. R. (2003). Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research, 30(2), 113–146. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250873
15.
BurlesonB. R.RackJ. J. (2008). Constructivism theory. In BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 51–63). Sage.
16.
CaiH.SedikidesC.GaertnerL.WangC.CarvalloM.XuY.O’MaraE. M.JacksonL. E. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in China: Is modesty at the service of self-enhancement in east Asian culture?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 59–64. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376599
CutronaC. E.SuhrJ. A.MacFarlaneR. (1990). Interpersonal transactions and the psychological sense of support. In DuckS. (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 30–45). Sage.
19.
EisensteinM.BodmanJ. W. (1986). ‘I very appreciate’: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 167–185. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.2.167
20.
Eslami-RasekhZ. (2004). Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14(1), 179–195. http://doi.org/10.1075/japc.14.1.11esl
21.
FaisalM. S.DaudA.AkramA. U.AbbasiR. A.AljohaniN. R.MehmoodI. (2019). Expert ranking techniques for online rated forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 168–176. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.013
22.
FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2006). Exploring the support-seeking process across cultures: Toward an integrated analysis of similarities and differences. In OrbeM. P.AllenB. J.FloresL. A. (Eds.), The same and different: Acknowledging the diversity within and between cultural groups (pp. 243–266). National Communication Association.
23.
FengB.LiS.LiN. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43(2), 253–276. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942
24.
FengB.MacGeorgeE. L. (2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes. Communication Research, 37(4), 553–575. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210368258
25.
FengB.ZhuX.ZhouY. N. (2018). Advice in cyberspace. In MacGeorgeE.SwolL. M. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of advice (pp. 363–380). Oxford University Press.
26.
FrantzC. M.BennigsonC. (2005). Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 201–207. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.007
GoldsmithD. J.MacGeorgeE. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234–263. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x
29.
Green-HamannS.Campbell EichhornK.SherblomJ. C. (2011). An exploration of why people participate in second life social support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 465–491. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01543.x
30.
GuanX.ParkH. S. (2005, November). A China-U.S. cross-cultural comparison in apology. Paper resented at the annual convention of National Communication Association, Boston, MA.
31.
GuanX.ParkH. S.LeeH. E. (2009). Cross-cultural differences in apology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 32–45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.10.001
32.
HeineS. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 881–905. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696168
33.
HeineS. J. (2003). Making sense of East Asian self-enhancement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(5), 596–602. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103256481
34.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 4–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294587
HighA. C.DillardJ. P. (2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63(1), 99–118. http://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.598208
HolmesJ. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 194–213. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.194
ItoiR.OhbuchiK. I.FukunoM. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preference of accounts: Relationship closeness, harm severity, and motives of account making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(10), 913–934. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01117.x
JessmerS. L.AndersonD. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 331–346.
44.
JohnsonD. I. (2007). Politeness theory and conversational refusals: Associations between various types of face threat and perceived competence. Western Journal of Communication, 71(3), 196–215. http://doi.org/10.1080/10570310701518427
45.
JonesS. M. (2004). Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. Communication Research, 31(3), 338–360. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204263436
46.
JonesS. M.GuerreroL. K. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27(4), 567–596. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00793.x
47.
KadorJ. (2009). Effective apology: Mending fences, building bridges, and restoring trust. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
48.
KimM. S.WilsonS. R. (1994). A cross-cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting. Communications Monographs, 61(3), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376334
KimuraK. (1994). The multiple functions of sumimasen. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 279–302. http://doi.org/10.5070/L452005185
51.
Kramer-MooreD.MooreM. (2003). Pardon me for breathing: Seven types of apology. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 60(2), 160–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42578290
52.
KunkelA. D.WilsonS. R.OlufowoteJ.RobsonS. (2003). Identity implications of influence goals: Initiating, intensifying, and ending romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 67(4), 382–412. http://doi.org/10.1080/10570310309374780
53.
LeeH. E. (2014). The effectiveness of apologies and thanks in favor asking messages: A cross-cultural comparison between Korea and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 335–348. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.10.004
54.
LeeH. E.ParkH. S. (2011). Why Koreans are more likely to favor “apology,” while Americans are more likely to favor “thank you”. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 125–146. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01396.x
55.
LeeH. E.ParkH. S.ImaiT.DolanD. (2012). Cultural differences between Japan and the United States in uses of “apology” and “thank you” in favor asking messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 263–289. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446595
56.
LiS.FengB. (2015). What to say to an online support-seeker? The influence of others’ responses and support-seekers’ replies. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 303–326. http://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12055
57.
LiS.FengB.WingateS. (2019). Give thanks for a little and you will find a lot: The role of a support seeker’s reply in online support provision. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 251–270. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1539237
58.
MacGeorgeE.FengB.GuntzvillerL. (2016). Advice: Expanding the communication paradigm. In CohenE. L. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 40, pp. 213–244). Routledge.
59.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Sage.
60.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ButlerG. L.BudarzS. K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 42–70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00724.x
61.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ThompsonE. R. (2008). “Good” and “bad” advice: How to advise more effectively. In MotelyM. T. (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 145–164). Sage.
62.
MadduxW. W.KimP. H.OkumuraT.BrettJ. M. (2011). Cultural differences in the function and meaning of apologies. International Negotiation, 16(3), 405–425. http://doi.org/10.1163/157180611X592932
63.
PanP. C. (2012). Interlanguage requests in institutional e-mail discourse. In Economidou-KogetsidisM.WoodfieldH. (Eds.), Interlanguage request modification (pp. 119–161). John Benjamins.
64.
PanW.FengB.LiS. (2020a). Online support groups dedicated to specific health problems. In EgbertN.WrightK. (Eds.), Social support and health in the digital age (pp. 109–128). Lexington Books.
65.
PanW.FengB.WingateV.LiS. (2020b). What to say when seeking support online: A comparison among different levels of self-disclosure. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00978
66.
PanW.ShenC.FengB. (2017). You get what you give: Understanding reply reciprocity and social capital in online health support forums. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 45–52. http://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1250845
67.
ParkH. S.GuanX. (2006). The effects of national culture and face concerns on intention to apologize: A comparison of the USA and China. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(3), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750601026933
68.
ParkH. S.LeeH. E. (2012). Cultural differences in “thank you”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 138–156. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438536
69.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
70.
RainsS. A.TsetsiE.AkersC.PavlichC. A.AppelbaumM. (2019). Factors influencing the quality of social support messages produced online: The role of responsibility for distress and others’ support attempts. Communication Research, 46(6), 866–886. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796371
71.
ReiterR. M. (2000). Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of requests and apologies (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, Vol. 83). John Benjamins.
72.
SearleJ. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
TakakuS.WeinerB.OhbuchiK. I. (2001). A cross-cultural examination of the effects of apology and perspective taking on forgiveness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(1-2), 144–166. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02321.x
TanakaN.Spencer-OateyH.CrayE. (2008). Apologies in Japanese and English. In Spencer-OateyH. (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. 73–94). Continuum.
79.
TracyK. (2011). A facework system of minimal politeness: Oral argument in appellate court. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behavior, Culture, 7(1), 123–145. http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.006
80.
TracyK.CraigR. T.SmithM.SpisakF. (1984). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a compliance-gaining approach. Human Communication Research, 10(4), 513–538. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00030.x
81.
YoungvorstL. J.HighA. C. (2018). Anyone free to chat?” using technological features to elicit quality support online. Communication Monographs, 85(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1426871
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
