When describing the passage of time, people metaphorically assign the agency for temporal change to themselves (e.g., we are approaching the weekend) or an event (the weekend is approaching). Embodiment theory suggests that temporal agency assignments reflect conceptual correspondences between time, motion, and emotion, whereby people symbolically move toward affectively positive events but passively observe the arrival of negative events. This article reports three studies testing these theoretical claims. Analyses of large spoken and written English corpora (Study 1) and solicited accounts of positive and negative experiences (Study 2) indicated that communicators prefer to assign temporal agency to themselves when describing positive events but to events when describing negative events. Study 3 demonstrated that temporal agency assignments have attributional consequences, in that they colored participants' perceptions of a fictitious speaker's affective orientation toward a described event. Implications of these findings for the study of temporal communication are discussed.
Albritton, D.W., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R.J. (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 612-625.
2.
Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Anspach, R.R. (1988). Notes on the sociology of medical discourse. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 357-375.
4.
Ballard, D.I., & Seibold, D.R. (2004). Organizational members' communication and temporal experience: Scale development and validation. Communication Research, 31, 135-172.
5.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6.
Barlow, M. (2000). Corpus of Spoken Professional American English [CD]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
7.
Barlow, M. (2002). MonoConc Pro. Available at http://athel.com/index.php
8.
Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577- 660.
9.
Benoit, W.L. (2001). Framing through temporal metaphor: The "bridges" of Bob Dole and Bill Clinton in their 1996 acceptance addresses. Communication Studies, 52, 70-84.
10.
Bergson, H. (1972/1889). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. London: Allen & Unwin.
11.
Berman, R.A. (2005). Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 105-124.
12.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
13.
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought . Psychological Science, 13, 185-189.
14.
Bowers, J.W., & Osborn, M.M. (1966). Attitudinal effects of selected types of concluding metaphors in persuasive speeches. Speech Monographs, 33, 147-155.
15.
Bradac, J.J. (1990). Language attitudes and impression formation. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 387-412). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
16.
Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language . Cognition, 14, 237-273.
17.
Bruneau, T. (1977). Chronemics: The study of time in human interaction (with a glossary of chronemic terminology). Communication, Journal of the Communication Association of the Pacific, 6, 1-30.
Cacioppo, J.T., Priester, J.R., & Bernston, G.G. (1993). Rudimentary determination of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17.
20.
Castor, T., & Cooren, F. (2006). Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 570-600.
21.
Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373-393.
23.
Cox, M.K., & Key, C.H. (1993). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons for the chi-square test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 951-962.
24.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26.
25.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London : Routledge.
26.
Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 358, 517-528.
27.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558-565.
30.
Godfrey, J., Holliman, E., & McDaniel, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 92, 517-520.
31.
Hauk , O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron , 41, 301-307.
32.
Henley, N.M., Miller, M., & Beazley, J. (1995). Syntax, semantics and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 14, 60-84.
33.
Jackson, S., O'Keefe, D.J., Jacobs, S., & Brashers, D.E. (1989). Messages as replications: Toward a message-centered design strategy. Communication Monographs , 56, 364-384.
34.
Johnson, M. (1990). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Keppel, G., Saufley, W.H., & Tokunaga, H. (1989). Introduction to design and analysis (2nd Ed.). New York: Freeman.
36.
Kiesler, S., Lee, S., & Kramer, A. (2006). Relationship effects in psychological explanations of nonhuman behavior. Anthrozoos, 19, 335-352.
37.
Kovecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LaFrance, M., Brownell, H., & Hahn, E. (1997). Interpersonal verbs, gender, and implicit causality . Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 138-152.
39.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
40.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Lamb, S. (1991). Acts without agents: An analysis of linguistic avoidance in journal articles on men who batter women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 250-257.
42.
Leibniz, G.W. (1956/1717). Fourth paper to Clarke. In H. G. Alexander (Ed.), The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence (pp. 36-39). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
43.
Levin, I., & Zakay, D. (1989). Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective . Oxford, UK: North Holland.
44.
Malle, B.F., Knobe, J.M., & Nelson, S.E. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 491-514.
45.
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1389-1400.
46.
McCroskey, J.C., & Combs, W.H. (1969). The effects and the use of analogy on attitude change and source credibility. Journal of Communication, 19, 333-339.
47.
McGlone, M.S., Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167-190.
48.
McGlone, M.S., & Harding, J.L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223.
49.
McGrath, J.E., & Kelly, J.R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford Press .
50.
McTaggart, J.M.E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457-474.
51.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York: Routledge.
52.
Miller, D.T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.
53.
Miller, G.A., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976). Language and perception . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition: The William James lectures, 1987. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Ng, S.H., & Bradac, J.J. (1993). Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
56.
Niedenthal, P.M., Barsalou, L.W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.
57.
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401-450.
58.
Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). (1989 ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
Puca, R.M., Rinkenauer, G., Breidenstein, C. (2006). Individual differences to approach and avoidance movements: How the avoidance motive influences response force. Journal of Personality, 74, 979-1014.
60.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80. (Whole No. 609).
61.
Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2002). Protean places: Teams across time and space. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 231-250.
62.
Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
63.
Simpson, R.C., S.L. Briggs, Ovens, J., & Swales, J.M. (1999). The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English . Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
64.
Smith, C.S. (1980). The acquisition of time talk: Relations between child and adult grammars. Journal of Child Language, 7, 263-278.
65.
Sopory, P. (2005). Metaphor in formative evaluation and message design: An application to relationships and alcohol use. Health Communication , 17, 149-172.
66.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis . Human Communication Research, 28, 382-419.
67.
Sorokin, P.A. and Merton, R.K. (1937). Social time: A methodological and functional analysis . American Journal of Sociology, 46, 615-629.
68.
Strohmetz, D. (2007). Research artifacts and the social psychology of psychological experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 2, 861-877.
69.
Sykes, M. (1988). From rights to needs: Official discourse and the "welfarization" of race. In G. Smitherman-Donaldson & T. van Dijk (Eds.), Discourse and discrimination (pp. 176-205). Detroit, MI : Wayne State University Press.
70.
van Dijk, T.A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
Whaley, B.B., & Wagner, L.S. (2000). Rebuttal analogy in persuasive messages: Communicator likability and cognitive responses. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 66-84.
72.
Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
