Priming linear versus cyclical conceptions of time influences affective forecasts and descriptions of grief. Relative to a linear or static prime, a cyclical prime prompted predictions of shorter grief duration, reliance on cyclical language, characterization of recovery as return to routine, and reduced characterization of the bereaved person as passive. To contrast, a linear prime uniquely prompted spatiotemporal metaphors, advising against pressure to “move forward” too soon.
AdamB. (1995). Timewatch—The social analysis of time. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
2.
Avni-BabadD.RitovI. (2003). Routine and the perception of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 543-550.
3.
BallardD. I.SeiboldD. (2004). Organization members’ communication and temporal experience. Communication Research, 31, 135-172.
4.
BlockR. A. (1985). Contextual coding in memory: Studies of remembered duration. In MichonJ. A.JacksonJ. L. (Eds.), Time, mind, and behavior (pp. 169-178). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
5.
BoroditskyL. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
6.
BrownR.FishD. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
7.
CalkinsK. (1970). Time: Perspectives, marking and styles of usage. Social Problems, 17, 487-501.
8.
ClarkH. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In MooreT. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9.
ContiR. (2001). Time flies: Investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. Journal of Personality, 69, 1-26.
10.
CrossonM.CunhaM. P. E.VeraD.CunhaJ. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30, 129-145.
11.
DewartM. H. (1979). The role of animate and inanimate nouns in determining sentence voice. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 135-141.
12.
FriedmanW. J.LyonT. D. (2005). Development of temporal-reconstructive abilities. Child Development, 76, 1202-1216.
13.
GilbertD. T.PinelE. C.WilsonT. D.BlumbergS. J.WheatleyT. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
14.
GlicksohnJ.Ron-AvniR. (1997). The relationship between preference for temporal conceptions and time estimation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-15.
15.
GouldS. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
IgouE. R. (2004). Lay theories in affective forecasting: The progression of affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 528-534.
17.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
KurtzJ. L. (2008). Looking to the future to appreciate the present: The benefits of perceived temporal scarcity. Psychological Science, 19, 1238-1241.
19.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
LehmanD. R.EllardJ. H.WortmanC. B. (1986). Social support for the bereaved: Recipients’ and providers’ perspectives on what is helpful. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 438-446.
21.
Lévi-StraussC. (1967). Structural anthropology. New York, NY: Doubleday.
22.
LunneyG. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 263-269.
23.
McAuleyJ. D.JonesM. R.HolubS.JohnstonH. M.MillerN. S. (2006). The times of our lives: Life span development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 348-367.
24.
McGloneM. S.HardingJ. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223.
25.
McGloneM. S.PfiesterR. A. (2009). Does time fly when you’re having fun, or do you? Affect, agency, and embodiment in temporal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 3-31.
26.
Moore-EdeM. C.SulzmanF. M.FullerC. A. (1982). The clocks that time us: Physiology of the circadian system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
OuelletM.SantiagoJ.FunesM. J.LupiáñezJ. (2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17-24.
28.
RuscherJ. B. (2011). Moving forward: The effect of spatiotemporal metaphors on perceptions about grief. Social Psychology, 42, 225-230.
29.
SackR. L. (2010). Jet lag. New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 440-447.
30.
SaundersC.van SlykeC.VogelD. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 19-31.
31.
StefanicsG.HangyaB.HernádiI.WinklerI.LakatosP.UlbertI. (2010). Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 13578-13585.
32.
TollerP. W. (2005). Negotiation of dialectical contradictions by parents who have experienced the death of a child. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 46-66.
33.
WilseyS. A.ShearM. K. (2007). Descriptions of social support in treatment narratives of complicated grievers. Death Studies, 31, 801-819.
34.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131-134.
35.
WilsonT. D.WheatleyT.MeyersJ. M.GilbertD. T.AxsomD. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821-836.
36.
ZakayD.FleisigD. (2011). Psychological time, time perspective, culture and conflict resolution. In HanS.PöppelE. (Eds.), Culture and neural frames of communication (pp. 123-137). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
