Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
2.
Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Deerwester, S., & Harshman, R. (1988). Using latent semantic analysis to improve information retrieval. In O'Hare, J. J. (Ed.), Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 281-285).New York: ACM.
3.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Feldman, J.A. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
5.
Hu, X., Cai, Z., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). Strengths, limitations, and extensions of LSA. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis , & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 401-425). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge . Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
8.
Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
9.
Perfetti, C.A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: Tools and theories in language research. Discourse Processes, 25, 363-377.
10.
Shapiro, A., & McNamara, D. (2000). The use of latent semantic analysis as a tool for the quantitative assessment of understanding and knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 1-36.
11.
Wolfe, M.B.W., Schreiner, M.E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., et al. (1998). Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309-336.