Two studies examined the trilingual behavior, attitudes, and perceptions of secondgeneration teenagers of Sylheti-Bangladeshi origin studying Bengali at school. Language diaries and questionnaires were used to obtain data about Sylheti, English, Bengali, and code mixing. Reports of the use of English dominated in the public domains, though it was clear that Bengali also constituted an equally important part of participants’ sociolinguistic repertoire (for use in private domains) and their sociolinguistic identifications. Identification with the diglossically “low” variety Sylheti was relatively high, though significantly lower than English and Bengali. Code mixing, though low, was reported consistently across domains and was associated with intragroup communication. Overall, the outcomes of the multivariate statistical analyses were supportive of previous research in that participants’ use of each language was predicted by competence, vitality, contact, and identity factors associated with that language. Evidence for the additive role of minority languages in predicting multilingual communication was also obtained.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allard, R. L., & Landry, R. (1986). Subjective ethnolinguistic vitality viewed as a belief system. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 1-12.
2.
Baker, P.,& Mohieldeen, Y. (2000). The languages of London’s schoolchildren. In P. Baker & J. Eversley (Eds.), Multilingual capital: The languages of London’s schoolchildren and their relevance to economic, social and educational policies (pp. 5-60). London: Battlebridge.
3.
Blunkett, D. (2002). Integration with diversity: Globalisation and the renewal of democracy and civil society. In P. Griffith & M. Leonard (Eds.), Reclaiming Britishness (pp. 65-77). London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
4.
Bourhis, R. Y. (2001). Acculturation, language maintenance and language loss. In J. Klatter-Folmer & P. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Language maintenance and language loss (pp. 5-37). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
5.
Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., & Rosenthal, D. (1981). Notes on the construction of a “ Subjective Vitality Questionnaire” for ethnolinguistic groups. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2, 145-155.
6.
Bourhis, R. Y., & Sachdev, I. (1984). Vitality perceptions and language attitudes: Some Canadian data. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 3, 97-126.
7.
Bullock, A. (1975). A language for life: Report of the Committee of Inquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science under the chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock. London: HMSO.
8.
Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Edwards, J. (1994). Multilingualism. London: Routledge.
10.
Edwards, V., & Alladina, S. (1991). Many people, many tongues: Babel and beyond. In S. Alladina & V. Edwards (Eds.), Multilingualism in the British Isles 2. Africa, the Middle East & Asia (pp. 1-29). London: Longman.
11.
Fishman, J. A. (1989). Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1997). Vernacular literacy in new minority settings in Europe. In A. Tabouret-Keller, R. B. Le Page, P. Gardner-Chloros, & G. Varro (Eds.), Vernacular literacy: A re-evaluation (pp. 189-221). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
Gibbons, J. (1987). Code-mixing and code choice: A Hong Kong case study. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14.
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y.,& Taylor, D. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307-348). London: Academic Press.
15.
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 199-243). Oxford: Blackwell.
17.
Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. A. H. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1994). The genesis of vitality theory: Historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 108, 167-206.
19.
Hawkins, E. (1984). Awareness of language: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Husband, C.,& Saifullah Khan, V. (1982). The viability of ethnolinguistic vitality: Some creative doubts. Journal of Multilingualand Multicultural Development, 3, 193-205.
21.
Johnson, P., Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1983). The viability of ethnolinguistic vitality: A reply. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 4, 255-269.
22.
Landry, R.,& Allard, R. (1994). Diglossia, ethnolinguistic vitality and language behavior. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 108, 15-42.
23.
Lawson, S., & Sachdev, I. (2000). Codeswitching in Tunisia: Attitudinal & behavioural dimensions. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1343-1362.
24.
Mercer, L. (1981). Ethnicity and the supplementary school. In N. Mercer (Ed.), Language in school and community (pp. 147-160). London: Edward Arnold.
25.
Muysken, P. (1995). Code-switching and grammatical theory. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken, (Eds.), One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 177-198). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27.
Ng, S. H., & He, A. (2004). Code-switching in tri-generational family conversations among Chinese immigrants in New Zealand. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 28-48.
28.
Pennington, M., Balla, J., Detaramani, C., Poon, A.,& Tam, F. (1992). Towards a model of language choice among Hong Kong tertiary students: A preliminary analysis (Research Report no. 18). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, Department of English.
29.
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.
30.
Romaine, S. (1983). Collecting and interpreting self-reported data on the language use of linguistic minorities by means of “language diaries.” M.A.L.S. Journal, 8, 3-30.
31.
Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1990). Language and social identification. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 211-229). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33.
Sachdev, I.,& Bourhis, R. Y. (1993). Ethnolinguistic vitality: Some motivational and cognitive considerations. In M.Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 33-51). New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
34.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2001). Multilingual communication. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 407-428). New York: Wiley.
35.
Sayah, M. (1997). Le langage du Clan. Cahiers (Association for French Language Studies), 3.3, 15-25.
36.
Stubbs, M. (1985). Linguistic minorities project: The other languages of England. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
37.
Swann, M. (1985). Education for all: The report of the Committee of Inquiry into the education of children from ethnic minority groups. London: HMSO.
38.
Tabachnick, B. G.,& Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
39.
Townsend, H. (1971). Immigrants in England: The LEA response. Windsor, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Ure, J. (1979). Language choice and socialisation in a multilingualcommunity: Language use among primary school teachers in Ghana. In W. MacCormack & S. A. Wurm (Eds.), Language and society: Anthropological issues (pp. 263-283). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
