This article considers the role of linguistic context in social memory and social judgment. Two experiments compared perceivers’ responses to person descriptions formulated at a high level of linguistic abstraction (adjectives/traits) versus a low level of linguistic abstraction (action verbs/behaviors). Based on the linguistic category model, together with prior empirical findings in psychology and linguistics, traits as compared with behavioral descriptions of a social target were hypothesized to elicit lower attention, poorer recall, and more expectancy-consistent impressions. Support for these hypotheses was obtained for a social target consisting of an individual as well as a nonentitative group. These results suggest a moderating role of linguistic context in inconsistency processing. Whereas concrete (behavioral) person descriptions elicited relatively deep, systematic processing, abstract (trait) person descriptions elicited more cursory, heuristic processing guided by the perceiver’s expectancies regarding the target person. It is concluded that the methodological and substantive implications of linguistic context deserve greater attention in social psychological research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P.
(1994). A personal perspective on social cognition. In P. G. Devine, D. L. Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 15-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
Andersen, S. M.
, & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 235-246.
3.
Andersen, S. M.
, Klatzky, R. L., & Murray, J. (1990). Traits and social stereotypes: Efficiency differences in social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 192-201.
4.
Anderson, N. H.
(1996). Afunctional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Anderson, N. H.
, & Hubert, S. (1963). Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379-391.
6.
Asch, S. E.
(1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
7.
Baddeley, A.
, Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 113, 518-540.
8.
Bargh, J. A.
, & Thein, R. D. (1985). Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129-1146.
9.
Baron, R. M.
, & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
10.
Beach, L.
, & Wertheimer, M. (1961). A free response approach to the study of person cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 367-374.
11.
Brewer, M. B.
(1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Bruner, J. S.
(1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: Norton.
13.
Cacioppo, J. T.
, Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.
14.
Campos, A.
(1992). Concreteness, emotionality, and meaningfulness as determiners of the imagery values of words when meaning is controlled. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 367-368.
15.
Carlston, D. E.
(1994). Associated systems theory: A systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 7, pp. 1-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Chaiken, S.
(1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Craik, F. I.
, & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
18.
Day, J. C.
, & Bellezza, F. S. (1983). The relation between visual imagery mediators and recall. Memory and Cognition, 11, 251-257.
19.
Dreben, E. K.
, Fiske, S. T., & Hastie, R. (1979). The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1758-1768.
20.
Driscoll, D. M.
, Hamilton, D. L., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1991). Uncertainty orientation and recall of person-descriptive information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 494-500.
21.
Eagly, A. H.
, & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
22.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Cox, M. G. (1979). Person concepts: The effect of target familiarity and descriptive purpose on the process of describing others. Journal of Personality, 47, 136-161.
23.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation: From category-based to individuating processes as a function of information, motivation and attention. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Gee, N. R.
, Nelson, D. L., & Krawczyk, D. (1999). Is the concreteness effect a result of underlying network interconnectivity?Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 479-497.
25.
Hamilton, D. L.
, & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
26.
Hastie, R.
(1980). Memory for information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, R. S. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 141-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Hastie, R.
(1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
28.
Hastie, R.
, & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
29.
Hastie, R.
, & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
30.
Hemsley, G. D.
, & Marmurek, H. H. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433-438.
31.
Higgins, E. T.
, & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
32.
Jones, E. E.
, & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
33.
Jones, E. E.
, Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. (1961). Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 302-310.
34.
Kanungo, R. N.
, & Das, J. P. (1960). Differential learning and forgetting as a function of the social frame of reference. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 82-86.
35.
Kanungo, R. N.
, & Dutta, S. (1966). Retention of affective material: Frame of reference or intensity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 27-35.
36.
Kelley, H. H.
(1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. S. E. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
37.
Kenny, D. A.
, Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Kouwer, B. J.
(1958). Een bewerking van de polariteitsprofielen-methode van Osgood [An elaboration of the semantic differential technique of Osgood]. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 13, 1-14.
39.
Leung, J. J.
, Suzuki, N. S., & Foster, S. F. (1983). Imagery values, instructional prompts, and noun recall. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 87-90.
40.
Livesley, W. J.
, & Bromley, D. B. (1973). Person perception in childhood and adolescence. London: Wiley.
41.
Maass, A.
, Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
42.
Macrae, C. N.
, Bodenhausen, G. V., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Milne, A. B. (1999). Tales of the unexpected: Executive function and person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 200-213.
43.
Marschark, M.
, & Cornoldi, C. (1991). Imagery and verbal memory. In C. Cornoldi & A. McDaniel (Eds.), Imagery and cognition (pp. 133-182). New York: Springer-Verlag.
44.
Marschark, M.
, & Surian, L. (1992). Concreteness effects in free recall: The roles of imaginal and relational processing. Memory and Cognition, 20, 612-620.
45.
Matlin, M. W.
, & Strang, D. J. (1978). The Polyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
46.
Mishra, R. C.
(1984). Recognition memory for visual stimuli as a function of labeling. Psychological Studies, 29, 4-8.
47.
Nelson, D. L.
, & Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237-260.
48.
Nisbett, R. E.
, & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings in social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49.
Osgood, C. E.
, Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
50.
Ostrom, T. M.
(1984). The sovereignty of social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Paivio, A.
(1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
52.
Paivio, A.
(1995). Imagery and memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 977-986). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
Petty, R. E.
, & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
54.
Petty, R. E.
, & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
55.
Petty, R. E.
, Priester, J. R., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Cognitive processes in attitude change. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 69-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Pratto, F.
, & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.
57.
Pryor, J. B.
, McDaniel, M. A., & Kott-Russo, T. (1986). The influence of the level of schema abstractness upon the processing of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 312-327.
58.
Ransdell, S. E.
, & Fischler, I. (1989). Effects of concreteness and task context on recall of prose among bilingual and monolingual speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 278-291.
59.
Rosenthal, R.
, & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analyses: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Rosnow, R. L.
, & Rosenthal, R. (1995). “Some things you learn aren’t so”: Cohen’s paradox, Asch’s paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3-9.
61.
Sadoski, M.
, Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291-304.
62.
Sears, D.
(1983). The person positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-240.
63.
Semin, G. R.
(1989). The contribution of linguistic factors to attribute inferences and semantic similarity judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 85-100.
64.
Semin, G. R.
(1995). Interfacing language and social cognition. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 182-194.
65.
Semin, G. R.
(2000). Language as a cognitive and behavioral structuring resource: Question-answer exchanges. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 75-104). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
66.
Semin, G. R.
, & De Poot, C. J. (1997). The question-answer paradigm: You might regret not noticing how a question is worded. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 472-480.
67.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
68.
Semin, G. R.
, & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model: Its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
69.
Semin, G. R.
, & Greenslade, L. (1985). Differential contributions of linguistic factors to memory-based ratings: Systematizing the systematic distortion hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1713-1723.
70.
Semin, G. R.
, & Marsman, J. G. (2000). The mnemonic functions of interpersonal verbs: Spontaneous trait inferences. Social Cognition, 18, 75-96.
71.
Semin, G. R.
, & Smith, E. R. (1999). Revisiting the past and back to the future: Memory systems and the linguistic representation of social events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 877-892.
72.
Sherman, J. W.
, Lee, A. Y., Bessenoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 589-606.
73.
Sherman, S. J.
, Beike, D. R., & Ryalls, K. R. (1999). Dual-processing accounts of inconsistencies in responses to general versus specific cases. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 203-230). New York: Guilford.
74.
Skowronski, J. J.
, & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
75.
Smith, E. R.
(1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
76.
Smith, E. R.
, & DeCoster, J. (1999). Associative and rule-based processing: A connectionist interpretation of dual-process models. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 323-336). New York: Guilford.
77.
Srull, T. K.
(1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.
78.
Srull, T. K.
, Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 316-345.
79.
Srull, T. K.
, & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
80.
Stangor, C.
, & Duan, C. (1991). Effects of multiple task demands upon memory for information about social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 357-378.
81.
Stangor, C.
, & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancyincongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
82.
Stern, L. D.
, Marrs, S., Millar, M. G., & Cole, E. (1984). Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253-262.
83.
Susskind, K.
, Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 181-191.
84.
Taylor, S. E.
(1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
85.
Taylor, S. E.
, & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium VI (pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
86.
Uleman, J. S.
, Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 211-279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
87.
Vallacher, R. R.
, & Selz, K. (1991). Who’s to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape. Social Cognition, 9, 194-219.
88.
Vonk, R.
, & Olde Monnikhof, M. (1998). Gender subgroups: Intergroup bias within the sexes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 37-47.
89.
Wegner, D. M.
, & Vallacher, R. R. (1986). Action identification. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 550-582). New York: Guilford.
90.
Wegner, D. M.
, Vallacher, R. R., Kiersted, G. W., & Dizadji, D. (1986). Action identification in the emergence of social behavior. Social Cognition, 4, 18-38.
91.
Winter, L.
, & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252.
92.
Wyer, R. S.
, Bodenhausen, G. V., & Srull, T. K. (1984). The cognitive representation of persons and groups and its effect on recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 445-469.
93.
Wyer, R. S.
, & Gordon, S. E. (1982). The recall of information about persons and groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 128-164.
94.
Wyer, R. S.
, Lambert, A. J., Budesheim, T. L., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (1992). Theory and research on person impression formation: A look to the future. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp.3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95.
Wyer, R. S.
, Srull, T. K., & Gordon, S. E. (1984). The effects of predicting a person’s behavior on subsequent trait judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 29-46.
96.
Zhang, H.
, & Peng, D. (1990). The influence of contextual information on the recall of abstract and concrete Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 22, 391-396.
