Study 1 investigated differences in the language used by 86 female and male middle managers and career professionals during role plays of criticism that they had recently voiced to a colleague. Discriminant analysis revealed significant differences in language use, permitting 72% accurate gender reclassification. The language features more indicative of men were number of words, negations, questions, judgmental adjectives, references to emotion, and oppositions. Those more predictive of women were intensive adverbs, longer mean length sentences, hedges, directives, dependent clauses, and sentence initial adverbials. However, nearly one half of these gender indicators had been found in previous research to be predictive of the opposite gender. In Study 2, effects of these language differences on third-party observers’ judgments were assessed. Contrary to earlier research in nonorganizational settings, no differences were found on Socio-Intellectual Status, Aesthetic Quality, or Dynamism. Results indicated a gender-differentiating, but counterstereotypical, language use of female and male managers and career professionals in criticism giving.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, P. H.
(1987). Gender differences in persuasive communication and attribution of success. Human Communication Research, 13, 372-385.
2.
Applegate, J. L.
(1980). Person- and position-centered communication in a day care center. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 3, pp. 59-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
Applegate, J. L.
(1982). The impact of construct system development on communication and impression formation in persuasive contexts. Communication Monographs, 49, 277-289.
4.
Aries, E.
(1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Ashmore, R. D.
, & Tumia, M. L. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: I. A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 501-518.
6.
Balswick, J.
, & Avertt, C. P. (1977). Differences in expressiveness: Gender, interpersonal orientation, and perceived parental expressiveness as contributing factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 121-127.
7.
Bartol, K. M.
, & Martin, D. C. (1986). Women and men in task groups. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts (pp. 259-310). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8.
Bass, B. M.
(1981). Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
9.
Baxter, L. A.
(1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427-456.
10.
Beck, R.
(1978). Sex differentiated speech codes. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 1, 566-572.
11.
Benoit, W. L.
, & Benoit, P. J. (1988). Factors influencing the accuracy of verbal reports of conversational behavior. Central States Speech Journal, 39, 218-232.
12.
Bilous, F. R.
, & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language & Communication, 8, 183-194.
13.
Broverman, I. K.
, Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
14.
Calas, M. B.
, & Smircich, L. (1996). From “the woman’s” point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Canary, D. J.
, & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication?Communication Quarterly, 41, 129-144.
16.
Carless, S. A.
(1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39, 887-901.
17.
Cody, M.
(1982). A typology of disengagement strategies and an examination of the role intimacy, reactions to inequity, and relational problems play in strategy selection. Communication Monographs, 49, 148-170.
18.
Cohen, J.
(1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19.
Crosby, F.
, & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff’s hypothesis. Language in Society, 6, 313-322.
20.
Cusella, L. P.
(1987). Feedback, motivation, and performance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 624-678). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Deaux, K.
, & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.
22.
Del Boca, R. K.
, & Ashmore, R. D. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: II. A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 7, 301-308.
23.
Deutsch, M.
(1961). The interpretation of praise and criticism as a function of their social context. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 391-400.
24.
Diesel, C. A.
(1996, November). The consequences of criticizing communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
25.
Dillard, J. P.
(1988). Compliance-gaining message selection: What is our dependent variable?Communication Monographs, 55, 162-183.
26.
Dillard, J. P.
, & Burgoon, M. (1985). Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining strategies: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52, 289-304.
27.
Eagly, A. H.
, & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
28.
Epstein, C. F.
(1981). Women in law. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Fairhurst, G. T.
, Green, S. G., & Snavely, B. K. (1984). Face support in controlling poor performance. Human Communication Research, 11, 272-295.
30.
Fishman, P. M.
(1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397-406.
31.
Frances, S. J.
(1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 519-535.
32.
Frey, L. R.
(1994). Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Giles, H.
, Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Giles, H.
, Scherer, K. R., & Taylor, D. M. (1979). Speech markers in social interaction. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 343-381). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Gleser, G. C.
, Gottschalk, L. A., & John, W. (1959). The relationship of sex and intelligence to choice of words: A normative study of verbal behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 182-191.
36.
Graziano, W. G.
, Brothen, T., & Berscheid, E. (1980). Attention, attraction and individual differences in reaction to criticism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 193-202.
37.
Haas, A.
(1979). The acquisition of genderlect. In J. Orsanu, M. K. Slater, & L. L. Adler, (Eds.), Language, sex and gender (pp. 101-113). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
38.
Hartman, M.
(1976). A descriptive study of the language of men and women born in Maine around 1900 as it reflects the Lakoff hypotheses in Language and woman’s place. In B. L. Dubois & I. Crouch (Eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women (pp. 81-90). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press.
39.
Henley, J. M.
, & Kramarae, C. (1991). Gender, power, and miscommunication. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 18-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Hunt, K. W.
(1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
41.
Judge, T. A.
, & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social contexts of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80-105.
42.
Kanter, R. M.
(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Kerlinger, F. N.
(1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
44.
Lachenbruch, P. A.
, & Mickey, M. R. (1968). Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics, 10, 1-11.
45.
Lapadat, J.
, & Seesahai, M. (1978). Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter, 8, 7-8.
46.
McMillan, J. R.
, Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Gale, W. S. (1977). Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?Sex Roles, 3, 545-559.
47.
Miller, K.
(1995). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
Mulac, A.
(1975). Evaluation of the Speech Dialect Attitudinal Scale. Speech Monographs, 42, 1982-1989.
49.
Mulac, A.
(1976). Assessment and application of the Revised Speech Dialect Attitudinal Scale. Communication Monographs, 43, 238-245.
50.
Mulac, A.
(1989). Men’s and women’s talk in same sex and mixed-sex dyads: Power or polemic?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 249-270.
51.
Mulac, A.
(1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 127-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Mulac, A.
, & Bradac, J. J. (1995). Women’s style in problem solving interactions: Powerless, or simply feminine? In P. J. Kalbfleish & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power and communication (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Mulac, A.
, Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (in press). Empirical support for the “gender as culture” hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research.
54.
Mulac, A.
, Incontro, C. R., & James, M. R. (1985). Comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1099-1110.
55.
Mulac, A.
, & Lundell, T. L. (1980). Differences in perceptions created by syntactic-semantic productions of male and female speakers. Communication Monographs, 47, 111-118.
56.
Mulac, A.
, & Lundell, T. L. (1982). An empirical test of the gender-linked language effect in a public speaking setting. Language and Speech, 25, 243-256.
57.
Mulac, A.
, & Lundell, T. L. (1986). Linguistic contributors to the gender-linked language effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 81-101.
58.
Mulac, A.
, & Lundell, T. L. (1994). Effects of gender-linked language differences in adults’ written discourse: Multivariate tests of language effects. Language and Communication, 14, 299-309.
59.
Mulac, A.
, Lundell, T. L., & Bradac, J. J. (1986). Male/female language differences and attributional consequences in a public speaking situation: Toward an explanation of the gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 53, 115-129.
60.
Mulac, A.
, Studley, L. B., & Blau, S. (1990). The gender-linked language effect in primary and secondary students’ impromptu essays. Sex Roles, 23, 439-469.
61.
Mulac, A.
, Studley, L. B., Wiemann, J. M., & Bradac, J. J. (1987). Male/female gaze in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: Gender-linked differences and mutual influence. Human Communication Research, 13, 323-343.
62.
Mulac, A.
, Wiemann, J. M., Widenmann, S. J., & Gibson, T. W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315-335.
63.
Nieva, V. F.
, & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Warner Books.
64.
Nkomo, S. M.
, & Cox, T., Jr. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 338-356). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
Nomura, N.
, & Barnlund, D. (1983). Patterns of interpersonal criticism in Japan and United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 7, 1-18.
66.
Pearson, J. C.
, West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (1993). Gender and Communication. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
67.
Poole, M. E.
(1979). Social class, sex, and linguistic coding. Language and Speech, 22, 49-67.
68.
Sause, E. F.
(1976). Computer content analysis of sex differences in the language of children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 311-324.
69.
Schleuter, D. W.
, & Smythe, M. J. (1984, November). Effects of situation and target upon compliance-gaining message choices: A behavioral analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.
70.
Smircich, L.
, & Calas, M. B. (1987). Organizational culture: A critical assessment. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 228-263). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
Smith, P. M.
(1985). Language, the sexes and society. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
72.
Staley, C. M.
(1982). Sex-related differences in the style of children’s language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 141-158.
73.
Street, R. L., Jr.
, & Giles, H. (1982). Accommodation theory. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp.193-226). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74.
Tracy, K.
, Craig, R. T., Smith, M., & Spisak, F. (1983, November). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a compliance-gaining approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.
75.
Tracy, K.
, & Eisenberg, E. (1990/1991). Giving criticism: A multiple-goal case study. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 37-70.
76.
Tracy, K.
, & McLaurin, P. (1991, June). Receiving criticism at work: Race and gender differences in communicator goal concerns. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
77.
Warshay, D. W.
(1972). Sex differences in language style. In C. Safilios-Rothchild (Ed.), Toward a sociology of women (pp. 3-9). Lexington, MA: Xerox College.
78.
Williams., J. E.
, & Bennet, S. M. (1975). The definition of sex stereotypes via the Adjective Check List. Sex Roles, 1, 327-337.
79.
Winer, B. J.
(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
80.
Wood, M. M.
(1966). The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech. Word, 22, 112-137.
81.
Zahn, C. J.
, & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113-123.
