In Chile, approximately 10,000 children participate in youth orchestras. Furthermore, a law for gifted children is currently being debated in the National Congress. This study aimed to understand care practices within the ecosystem of children gifted for music. A multiple case study was conducted, including episodic interviews using multimodal tools with five girls between the ages of 8 and 17, nominated by their teachers for their high musical aptitude and participating in the Foundation of Youth and Children’s Orchestras of Chile (FOJI), as well as with their parents, educators, and institutional representatives (11 adults). Four categories of care practices were identified: basic needs and rights, learning and education, emotional support, and musical development. Deficiencies in care reflect structural power dynamics and insufficient societal commitment to children’s development. This study contributes to the identification of critical areas and provides information for the design and evaluation of programs for gifted children.
ArbinagaF. (2023). Resilient behaviors in music students: Relationship with perfectionism and self-efficacy. Behavioral sciences, 13(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090722
3.
AthertonG.DawsonE.CrossL. (2025). Metaphors and myths: Using the board game Dixit to understand the autistic lived experience. Discover Psychology, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00340-9
4.
BakerG. (2014). El Sistema: Orchestrating Venezuela’s Youth. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BautistaA.CerdánR.García-CarriónR.SalsaA. M.AldoneyD.Cabedo-MasA.CamposR.ClaràM.Gámez-GuadixM.IlariB.KammererY.Macedo-RouetM.MendiveS.MúñezD.SauxG. I.SunH.SunJ.VenturaA. C.YangW.MáñezI. (2023). What research is important today in human development, learning and education? JSED editors’ reflections and research calls. Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 46(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2022.2137980
BosoM.EmanueleE.PrestoriF.PolitiP.BaraleE.D’AngeloE. (2010). Autism and genius: Is there a link? The involvement of central brain loops and hypotheses for functional testing. Functional Neurology, 25(1), 15–20.20630121
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2024). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: A values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(6), 1–40. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244
10.
BreikW. D.ZazaH. I. (2019). Coping strategies adopted by adolescents: A comparative study in relation to gifted status, gender, and family size. Gifted Education International, 35(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429418824118
11.
BronfenbrennerU.EvansG. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114
12.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
13.
BussuA.MangiaruloM. (2024). Playing music together: Exploring the impact of a classical music ensemble on adolescent’s life skills self-perception.PLoS ONE, 19(7), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306326
14.
Cámara de Diputadas y Diputados. (2025). Proyecto de Ley: Regula la identificación y el acompañamiento de niños, niñas y adolescentes con altas capacidades en el sistema educativo. Número de boletín 17295-04.
15.
Conejeros-SolarM. L.CatalánS.Gómez-ArizagaM. P.López-JiménezT.ContadorN.Sandoval-RodríguezK.BustamanteC.QuijanesJ. (2024). A systematic review of conceptualizations, early indicators, and educational provisions for intellectual precocity. Journal of Intelligence, 12(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12080076
16.
Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes. (2017). Estudio de caracterización del estado actual de las orquestas y ensambles juveniles e infantiles en Chile. Santiago de Chile. Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes.
17.
Darling-HammondL.FlookL.Cook-HarveyC.BarronB.OsherD. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
18.
Delgado-ValenciaL.DelgadoB.Navarro-SoriaI.TorrecillasM.Rosales-GómezM.Sánchez-HerreraM. d. l. C.Soto-DíazM. (2025). The identification of giftedness in children: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081012
19.
FlickU. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In BauerM. W.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 76–92). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.n5
20.
FordK.CampbellS. (2024). Being participatory through photo-based images. In CoyneI.CarterB. (Eds.), Being participatory: Researching with children and young people: Co-constructing knowledge using creative, digital and innovative techniques (pp. 145–167). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47787-4_7
21.
GagnéF. (2021). Differentiating Giftedness from Talent. The DMGT Perspective on Talent Development. New York: Routledge.
22.
Good-PerkinsE. (2023). The sounds of hope: Music homeplaces and compassionate, abolitionist music teaching. In HendricksEn K. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of care in music education (pp. 449–462). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197611654.013.52
23.
GrzankaP. R.MoradiB. (2021). The qualitative imagination in counseling psychology: Enhancing methodological rigor across methods. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000560
24.
HallH.DavidsonJ.GaleC. (2025). How do concepts and measures of children’s well-being outcomes align with perspectives of care-experienced children? A scoping review. Child Indicators Research, 18(6), 2377–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-025-10251-9
25.
HarrisonH.BirksM.FranklinR.MillsJ. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations [34 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 1-17. Art. 19. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1701195
26.
HendricksK. (2023). A call for care and compassion in music education. In En HendricksK. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of care in music education (pp. 5–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197611654.013.52
27.
HendricksK.McPhersonG. (2023). Reconsidering musical ability development through the lens of diversity and bias. In HendricksEn K. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of care in music education (pp. 408–420). Oxford University Press.
28.
JeongS. S. Y.RyanC. (2022). A critical review of child perfectionism as it relates to music pedagogy. Psychology of Music, 50(4), 1312–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211042080
29.
Kohan-MassJ.TalL. (2019). Differences in self-efficacy beliefs between girls in the top 1.5% and the top 3% in general cognitive ability who participate in gifted programs. Gifted Education International, 35(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429417753130
KüryL.FischerC. (2025). The self-perceptions of Twice- exceptional children: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010044
32.
KuznetsovaE.LiashenkoA.ZhozhikashviliN.ArsalidouM. (2024). Giftedness identification and cognitive, physiological and psychological characteristics of gifted children: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411981
33.
López-ÍñiguezG.McPhersonG. E. (2023). Caring approaches to young, gifted music learners’ education: A PRISMA scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1167292
34.
López-ÍñiguezG.McPhersonG. E. (2025). Issues and approaches to gifted education in specialist music programs globally: Insights from institutional leaders. Gifted Education International, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294251360614
35.
López-ÍñiguezG.WesterlundH. (2023). The politics of care in the education of children gifted for music: A systems view. In HendricksEn K. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of care in music education (pp. 115–129). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197611654.013.13
36.
Lorenzo de ReizábalM.Corbalán AbellánM. (2025). Conectando la música y la psicología: Avances en neurociencia, salud mental y bienestar comunitario (pp. 1–384). Madrid: Dykinson.
37.
MabaA.SakarM. H. (2025). Effects of technology-enhanced active learning on the musical creativity of gifted students. Creativity Studies, 18(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2025.16335
Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio. (2024). Política de educación artística 2024-2029. Gobierno de Chile.
40.
NanningsM.van WeerdenburgM.van der ZandenP. J. A. C.HoogeveenL. (2025). Social–emotional and educational needs of higher education students with high abilities: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 1–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060819
41.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
42.
NorwichB. (2022). Research about inclusive education: Are the scope, reach and limits empirical and methodological And/Or conceptual and evaluative?Frontiers in Education, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.937929
43.
OgurluÜ.Sevgi-YalınH.Yavuz-BirbenF. (2016). The relationship between social–emotional learning ability and perceived social support in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416657221
44.
PalazzoloC. (2024). Philosophy of musical relationships: Care ethics and moral responsibility of musical agency. Philosophie, 9(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9060183
45.
PapenborgD. (2025). Inclusive approaches to supporting creatively gifted students experiencing artist’s block in higher arts education. Gifted Education International, 42(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294251397533
46.
PereiraN.KnottsD.LinkJ. (2015). Current status of twice-exceptional students: A look at legislation and policy in the United States. Gifted and Talented International, 30(1-2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137463
47.
RautiainenP.MustasaariS.López-ÍñiguezG.Recognizing and enacting the legal rights of children gifted for music. In López-ÍñiguezG.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), Caring for gifted and talented music learners: Perspectives and future possibilities. Oxford University Press. (in press).
48.
ReisS.BaumS.BrukeE. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
49.
RiescoA.Ángel-AlvaradoR.BakerG. (2024). Activismo en la fundación de orquestas juveniles e infantiles de Chile. Calle 14 revista de investigación en el campo del arte, 19(36), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.14483/21450706.20832
50.
RochaA.BorgesA.García-PeralesR.AlmeitaA. (2024). Differences in socio-emotional competencies between high-ability students and typically-developing students. Frontiers in Education, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1450982
51.
Schonert-ReichlK. A. (2019). Advancements in the landscape of social and emotional learning and emerging topics on the horizon. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633925
52.
Scott-BarrettJ.CebulaK.FlorianL. (2023). The experiences and views of autistic children participating in multimodal view-seeking research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(4), 342–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2149728
53.
ShoebridgeA.OsborneM. (2025). Wellbeing for young elite musicians: Development of a health protocol from a student perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1401511
54.
SternbergR. J. (2024). Reframing social and emotional development of the gifted. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090752
55.
TordjmanS.Da CostaM. P.SchauderS. (2020). Rethinking human potential in terms of strength and fragility: A case study of Michael Jackson. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(4), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219894645
56.
TownendG.McGregorM.AlonzoD.NguyenH. (2024). What would it take? Enhancing outcomes for high-ability students with disability. Frontiers in Education, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1322872
57.
TrontoJ. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
UN General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child (pp. 1–164). United Nations, Treaty Series.
60.
VaghriZ.RuggieroR.LansdownG.Arkadas-ThibertA.WhalenC. (2025). General principles. In VaghriZ.RuggieroR.LansdownG. (Eds.), Children’s rights-based indicators. Children’s well-being: Indicators and research (vol 28, pp. 33–55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71594-5_4
61.
VansteenkisteM.RyanR. M.SoenensB. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
62.
WernerA.KuusiT. (2025). Gender equality discourse in classical music higher education: Women, individualisation, and change. International Journal of Music Education, 43(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614231199473
63.
ZhukovK.BarrettM. S. (2025). Development of early choral expertise: Insights from middle school elite choristers. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091093
