This study explored factors associated with the life satisfaction of gifted students using PISA 2015 data and identified heterogeneous sub-profiles within the gifted group. 356,544 students from 50 countries were analyzed, with gifted students defined as the academically top 5% within each country. Student final weights were applied throughout, and all analyses were repeated across 10 Plausible Value sets and integrated using Rubin’s rules. Weighted t-tests revealed that gifted students had higher socioeconomic status, home educational resources, and achievement motivation, and lower test anxiety, but no significant differences in life satisfaction. Weighted K-means cluster analysis (k = 4) yielded four sub-profiles: Holistically Thriving, Resilient Low-SES, Resource-Rich Disengaged, and Isolated & At-Risk. Permutation importance from a weighted random forest identified school belonging as the most important variable associated with high life satisfaction, followed by test anxiety and teacher support. These findings highlight the importance of relational experiences in understanding gifted students’ well-being.
AhmadiF.AhmadiS. (2020). School-related predictors of students’ life satisfaction: The mediating role of school belongingness. Contemporary School Psychology, 24(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00262-z
2.
AkerS.ŞahinM. K. (2022). The relationship between school burnout, sense of school belonging and academic achievement in preclinical medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(4), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10121-x
3.
AllenW. T. (2017). Bullying and the Unique Socioemotional Needs of Gifted and Talented Early Adolescents: Veteran Teacher Perspectives and Practices. Roeper Review, 39(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1362678
4.
ArslanG. (2019). School belonging in adolescents: Exploring the associations with school achievement and internalising and externalising problems. Educational and Child Psychology, 36(4), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2019.36.4.22
5.
BergoldS.WirthweinL.RostD. H.SteinmayrR. (2015). Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers?Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01623
6.
BradleyR. H.PutnickD. L. (2012). Housing quality and access to material and learning resources within the home environment in developing countries. Child Development, 83(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01674.x
7.
CarterS. S.AvciA. H.MammadovS. (2025). School experiences of gifted adolescents and their peers. Psychology in the Schools, 62(9), 3273–3284. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23537
8.
ChengL.ChenX.LiuY. (2025). The relationship between teacher support, student support, resilience, and emotional intelligence: Comparison of gifted and nongifted children. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 23(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.02.006
9.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2099–2111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
10.
Conejeros-SolarM. L.SmithS. R. (2021). Homeschooling gifted learners: An Australian experience. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 30(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2021.0003
11.
Connolly-SporingA.CodyR. A.PluckerJ. A. (2024). Gifted students learning in homeschool settings: Research and policy recommendations. Journal of School Choice, 18(4), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2024.2422246
12.
DanO.Bar IlanO.KurmanJ. (2014). Attachment, self-esteem and test anxiety in adolescence and early adulthood. Educational Psychology, 34(6), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814191
13.
DatuJ. A. D.ValdezJ. P. M. (2019). Psychological capital is associated with higher levels of life satisfaction and school belongingness. School Psychology International, 40(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319838011
14.
DatuJ. A. D.YuenM.FungE.ZhangJ.ChanS.WuF. (2022). The satisfied lives of gifted and gritty adolescents: Linking grit to career self-efficacy and life satisfaction. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(8), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221096082
15.
DearingE.TangS. (2010). The home learning environment and achievement during childhood. In Handbook of school-family partnerships (pp. 131–157). Routledge.
16.
DesmetO. A.Camargo SalamancaS.LeeH.TuzgenA. (2023). The effect of student–teacher relationships on students’ math motivation across EU countries. Journal of Advanced Academics, 34(3-4), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X231218048
17.
de Souza FleithD.Vilarinho-PereiraD.Muniz PradoR. (2024). Voices from the families: Strategies for and challenges in raising a gifted child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532241235576
18.
DuplenneL.BourdinB.FernandezD. N.BlondelleG.AubryA. (2024). Anxiety and depression in gifted individuals: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231208922
19.
EmadpoorL.LavasaniM. G.ShahcheraghiS. M. (2016). Relationship between perceived social support and psychological well-being among students based on mediating role of academic motivation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9608-4
20.
EsenE.AdıgüzelO. C. (2023). The effect of socioeconomic level on academic achievement: Evidence from PISA. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 16(4), 925–947. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1279154
21.
FeracoT.ResnatiD.FregoneseD.SpotoA.MeneghettiC. (2023). An integrated model of school students’ academic achievement and life satisfaction. Linking soft skills, extracurricular activities, self-regulated learning, motivation, and emotions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00601-4
22.
FındıkH.AfatN. (2023). Perfectionism and life satisfaction in gifted students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(4), 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.4.1285
23.
GruganM. C.HillA. P.MadiganD. J.DonachieT. C.OlssonL. F.EthersonM. E. (2021). Perfectionism in academically gifted students: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1631–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09597-7
24.
GuessP. E.McCane-BowlingS. J. (2016). Teacher support and life satisfaction: An investigation with urban, middle school students. Education and Urban Society, 48(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513514604
25.
GuignardJ. H.BacroF.GuimardP. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448
HaberlinS. (2015). Don’t stress: What do we really know about teaching gifted children to cope with stress and anxiety?Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137465
28.
HébertT. P. (2021). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Routledge.
29.
HeilatM. Q.SeifertT. (2019). Mental motivation, intrinsic motivation and their relationship with emotional support sources among gifted and non-gifted Jordanian adolescents. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1587131
30.
HelsperA.DeShonL.BoylanL. E.GalliherJ.RubensteinL. D. (2025). Under pressure: Gifted students’ vulnerabilities, stressors, and coping mechanisms within a high achieving high school. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020235
31.
HornstraL.StroetK.Rubie-DaviesC.FlintA. (2023). Teacher expectations and self-determination theory: Considering convergence and divergence of theories. Learning and Individual Differences, 107(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102345
32.
HughesJ. N.ImM. H.AlleeP. J. (2015). Effect of school belonging trajectories in grades 6–8 on achievement: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.08.001
33.
JinS. U.MoonS. M. (2006). A study of well-being and school satisfaction among academically talented students attending a science high school in Korea. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000207
34.
KarakusM.CourtneyM.AydinH. (2023). Understanding the academic achievement of the first-and second-generation immigrant students: A multi-level analysis of PISA 2018 data. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(2), 233–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09395-x
35.
KimS.YooM. (2013). Comparison of time management behavior, life satisfaction between gifted middle school students and general students, and relationship between the time management behaviors and life satisfaction. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2013.23.3.315
36.
KoenkaA. C.Linnenbrink-GarciaL.MoshontzH.AtkinsonK. M.SanchezC. E.CooperH. (2021). A meta-analysis on the impact of grades and comments on academic motivation and achievement: A case for written feedback. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1659939
37.
KuhnH. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800020109
38.
LeeH.CressA. (2024). Academic and affective effects of enrichment programs from parents’ perspectives. Advance Research in Sciences, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54026/ARS/1020
39.
MammadovS. (2023). Personality profiles of gifted adolescents and relations with life satisfaction, perceived social support, and academic achievement. High Ability Studies, 34(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2022.2068509
40.
MammadovS.CrossT. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2021). A look beyond aptitude: The relationship between personality traits, autonomous motivation, and academic achievement in gifted students. Roeper Review, 43(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1923595
41.
MarquezJ.LongE. A. (2021). Global decline in adolescents’ subjective well-being: A comparative study exploring patterns of change in the life satisfaction of 15-year-old students in 46 countries. Child Indicators Research, 14, 1251–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09788-8
Navarro-CarrilloG.Alonso-FerresM.MoyaM.Valor-SeguraI. (2020). Socioeconomic status and psychological well-being: Revisiting the role of subjective socioeconomic status. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
49.
OgurluÜ.Sevgi-YalınH.Yavuz-BirbenF. (2016). The relationship between social–emotional learning ability and perceived social support in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416657221
50.
PawilenP. T. (2018). Home environment of selected Filipino gifted individuals. The International Academic Forum (IAFOR) Journal of Education, 6(2), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.2.05
51.
RaoofK.ShokriO.FathabadiJ.PanaghiL. (2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36908
52.
RoosA. L.GoetzT.VoracekM.KrannichM.BiegM.JarrellA.PekrunR. (2021). Test anxiety and physiological arousal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 579–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09543-z
SchillingerF. L.MosbacherJ. A.BrunnerC.VogelS. E.GrabnerR. H. (2021). Revisiting the role of worries in explaining the link between test anxiety and test performance. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1887–1906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09601-0
55.
SchutteI.WolfensbergerM.TirriK. (2014). The relationship between ethical sensitivity, high ability and gender in higher education students. Gifted and Talented International, 29(1-2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2014.11678428
56.
SilvermanL. K. (2021). Counseling asynchronous gifted students: A 30-year perspective. In Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 327–349). Routledge.
57.
SiskD. (2021). Managing the emotional intensities of gifted students with mindfulness practices. Education Sciences, 11(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110731
58.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
59.
TahoonR. (2021). Effects of test anxiety, distance education on general anxiety and life satisfaction of university students. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(1), 107–117. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4819-4567
60.
TaoY.MengY.GaoZ.YangX. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168
61.
VergeerJ.van WeerdenburgM.SchilsT.BakxA. (2025). Teachers in gifted education: Their perception of involvement of and interacting with parents, school leaders, and other teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 70(1), 52–69. online published first. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251351940
62.
VialleW. (2017). Supporting giftedness in families: A resources perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217734375
63.
VogelaarB.BakkerM.ElliottJ. G.ResingW. C. (2017). Dynamic testing and test anxiety amongst gifted and average‐ability children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12136
64.
VuT.Magis-WeinbergL.JansenB. R.van AtteveldtN.JanssenT. W.LeeN. C.van der MassH. L. J.RaijmakersM. E. J.SachisthalM. S. M.MeeterM. (2022). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7
65.
WellischM. (2021). Parenting with eyes wide open: Young gifted children, early entry and social isolation. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429419899946
66.
ZeidnerM. (2021). “Don’t worry—be happy”: The sad state of happiness research in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1733392
67.
ZeidnerM.SchleyerE. J. (1999). The big-fish–little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248328
68.
ZeidnerM.Shani-ZinovichI. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007
