The study of mental health among gifted and accelerated learners has continued to evolve since the publication of a chapter focused on their subjective well-being. This article provides an updated review of mental health research focusing on gifted learners, specifically through understanding flourishing is routed in their experiences of positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA theory). We explore literature published between 2017 and 2024 addressing PERMA as it relates to gifted, high-achieving, and accelerated youth. Recommendations for future research and practice are provided.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.KimD.ReschlyA. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
2.
AshC.HuebnerE. S. (1998). Life satisfaction reports of gfted middle-school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(4), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088987
3.
Bates-KrakoffJ.McGrathR. E.GravesK.OchsL. (2017). Beyond a deficit model of strengths training in schools: Teaching targeted strength use to gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416646210
4.
BergoldS.WirthweinL.SteinmayrR. (2018). Subjective well-being of intellectually gifted children and adolescents. In González-BurgosI. (Ed.), Psychobiological, clinical, and educational aspects of giftedness (pp. 143–165). Nova Biomedical Books.
5.
BergoldS.WirthweinL.SteinmayrR. (2020). Similarities and differences between intellectually gifted and average-ability students in school performance, motivation, and subjective well-being. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220932533
6.
BernsteinB. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2021) Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology113(4): 830–845. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500
7.
BückerS.NuraydinS.SimonsmeierB. A.SchneiderM.LuhmannM. (2018). Subjective well-being and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 74(5), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.02.007
8.
CarterM.McGeeR.TaylorB.WilliamsS. (2007). Health outcomes in adolescence: Associations with family, friends and school engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 30(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.04.002
9.
Casino-GarcíaA. M.García-PérezJ.Llinares-InsaL. I. (2019). Subjective emotional well-being, emotional intelligence, and mood of gifted vs. Unidentified students: A relationship model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183266
10.
Casino-GarcíaA. M.Llopis-BuenoM. J.Gómez-VivoM. G.Juan-GrauA.Shuali-TrachtenbergT.Llinares-InsaL. I. (2021). “Developing capabilities”. Inclusive extracurricular enrichment programs to improve the well-being of gifted adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), Article 731591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731591
11.
ChenX.FanX.CheungH. Y.WuJ. (2018). The subjective well-being of academically gifted students in the Chinese cultural context. School Psychology International, 39(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318773788
12.
ConnerJ. O.PopeD. C. (2013). Not just robo-students: Why full engagement matters and how schools can promote it. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1426–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9948-y
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1994). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure [review of Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure]. British Journal of Educational Studies, XXXXII(3), 299–301.
15.
DatuJ. A. D.YuenM.ChenG. (2017). Development and validation of the triarchic model of grit scale (TMGS): Evidence from Filipino undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 114(1), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.012
16.
DatuJ. A. D.YuenM.FungE.ZhangJ.ChanS.WuF. (2022). The satisfied lives of gifted and gritty adolescents: Linking grit to career self-efficacy and life satisfaction. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(8), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316221096082
17.
DerryberryD.TuckerD. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In NeidenthalP. M.KitayamaS. (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). Academic Press.
DienerE.OishiS.LucasR. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
20.
DiLeoL. L.SuldoS. M.FerronJ. M.Shaunessy-DedrickE. (2022). Three-wave longitudinal study of a dual-factor model: Mental health status and academic outcomes for high school students in academically accelerated curricula. School Mental Health, 14(3), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09497-9
21.
FordM. T.CerasoliC. P.HigginsJ. A.DecesareA. L. (2011). Relationships between psychological, physical, and behavioural health and work performance: A review and meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 25(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.609035
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
24.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of freud, einstein, picasso, stravinsky, eliot, graham, and ghandi. Basic Books.
25.
Gifford-SmithM. E.BrownellC. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4405(03)00048-7
26.
GoodmanF. R.DisabatoD. J.KashdanT. B.KauffmanS. B. (2018). Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434
27.
GuignardJ. H.BacroF.GuimardP. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448
28.
HeffnerA. L.AntaramianS. P. (2016). The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1
29.
HesamM.AbediA. (2020). Enhancing academic engagement of underachieving gifted students: The effects of Martin’s educational program. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_715_19
30.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1206
31.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A.NowickiG. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem-solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1122
32.
IsenA. M.JohnsonM. M. S.MertzE.RobinsonG. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413–1426. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.6.1413
33.
KellH. J.McCabeK. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2022). Wrecked by success? Not to worry. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 1291–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211055637
34.
KernM. L. (2022). Permah: A useful model for focusing on well-being in schools. In AllenK.FurlongM. J.Vella-BrodrickD.SuldoS. M. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools: Supporting process and practice (3rd ed., pp. 12–24). Routledge.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. T. (2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212442568
37.
LewisA. D.HuebnerE. S.MaloneP. S.ValoisR. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9517-6
38.
LewisA. D.HuebnerE. S.ReschlyA. L.ValoisR. F. (2009). The incremental validity of positive emotions in predicting school functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(5), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330571
39.
LiY.LernerR. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021307
40.
LitsterK.RobertsJ. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
MartinA. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 2), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036
43.
MerrittS. H.HeshmatiS.OraveczZ.DonaldsonS. I. (2024). Web of well-being: Re-examining PERMA and subjective well-being through networks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 19(3), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2209538
44.
Olszewski‐KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.DavisL. C.WorrellF. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318
45.
PaikS. J.GozaliC.Marshall‐HarperK. R. (2019). Productive giftedness: A new mastery approach to understanding talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20319
46.
ParkN (2004) The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science59(1): 25–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260078
47.
PetersonC. (2006) The values in action (VIA) classification of strengths. In CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI., (Eds) A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 29–48). Oxford University.
48.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University.
49.
ReschlyA.ChristensonS. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.
50.
Rodríguez-FernándezM. I.SternbergR. J. (2024). The search for meaning in the life of the gifted. Gifted Education International, 40(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294231189923
Samsen-BronsveldH. E.Van der VenS. H. G.SpeetjensP. P. A. M.BakxA. W. E. A. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on gifted and non-gifted primary school students’ well-being and motivation from a self-determination perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12583
SeligmanM. E. P.ErnstR. M.GillhamJ.ReivichK.LinkinsM. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980902934563
57.
SeligsonJ. L.HuebnerE. S.ValoisR. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021326822957
58.
ShernoffD. J.CsikszentmihalyiM.ShneiderB.ShernoffE. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
59.
SimontonD. K. (2000) Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. The American Psychologist55(1): 151–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
60.
Snikkers-MommerS.HoekmanJ.MayoA.MinnaertA. (2024). Triggered and maintained engagement with learning among gifted children in primary education. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1164498
61.
SuldoS.HearonB.Shaunessy-DedrickE. (2018). Subjective well-being among gifted and talented youth. In PfeifferS.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent. American Psychological Association.
62.
SuldoS.ThaljiA.FerronJ. (2011). Longitudinal academic outcomes predicted by early adolescents’ subjective well-being, psychopathology, and mental health status yielded from a dual factor model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.536774
63.
SuldoS. M.RileyK. N.ShafferE. J. (2006). Academic correlates of children and adolescents’ life satisfaction. School Psychology International, 27(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306073411
64.
SuldoS. M.ShafferE. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2008.12087908
65.
SuldoS. M.ShafferE. J.RileyK. N. (2008). A social-cognitive-behavioral model of academic predictors of adolescents' life satisfaction. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.56
WangM. T.PeckS. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030028
68.
VerschuerenK.LavrijsenJ.WeynsT.RamosA.De FraineB. (2019). Social acceptance of high-ability youth: Multiple perspectives and contextual influences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20316
69.
WangW. L. (2022). Socioaffective factors related to engagement in regular classes of academically gifted adolescent students in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality, 50(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.11223
WuJ.AssoulineS.McClurgV. M.McCallumR. S. (2022). An investigation of an early college entrance program’s ability to impact intellectual and social development. Roeper Review, 44(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2043503
72.
YeMLiL.LiY.ShenWenR. S.ZhangJ. (2014) Life satisfaction of adolescents in hunan, China: reliability and validity of Chinese Brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS).Social Indicators Research118(2): 515–522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0438-0
73.
YuenM.Tsz-Hong ChanR.WongS.-W.YauJ.ZhangJ.HoE. Y.-F.FungE.ChanS.WuF. (2023). Appropriateness of the dispositional hope scale (DHS) and meaning in life questionnaire: Short form (MLQ-SF) for use with regular and gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 34(4), 1–13. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2150589
74.
ZeidnerM. (2021). “Don’t worry—be happy”: The sad state of happiness research in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1733392
