An analysis of the impact of school closings on gifted services: Recommendations for meeting gifted students’ needs in a post-COVID-19 world

Abstract

Gifted support services were directly impacted by the COVID-19 shutdown in Spring 2020. This qualitative research study consisting of parents (n = 110) and gifted support teachers (n = 53) explored the impact on gifted students’ services and instruction. Utilizing surveys, open-ended response questions, and in-depth interviews, teachers and parents shared their thoughts and perceptions about challenge, enrichment, and students’ social-emotional health throughout the shutdown. Data analysis found that gifted services were directly impacted by the COVID-19 shutdown and parents and teachers shared that challenge and enrichment were lacking. However, data collected also showed that there is much potential to meet students’ academic and social-emotional needs virtually. Utilizing the data collected, a model was created to help teachers, parents, and school districts provide challenge, enrichment, and acceleration, as well as address social-emotional concerns in a virtual environment.

Keywords

virtual instruction COVID-19 asynchronous synchronous gifted social-emotional student engagement collaboration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amend

E. R

Koehler

Peters

M. P.

Joerg

M., &

Milles

(2020). Supporting your gifted child during COVID-19. National Association of Gifted Children. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Publication%20PHP/NAGC_TIP-Sheet_COVID-19_With%20Strategies%20by%20Development%20Level_April%202020.pdf

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

N., &

VanTassel-Baska

(2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. I). University of Iowa, Connie Belin & Jacquelinte N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Ballotpedia (2020). School responses to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic during the 2020-2021 academic year. https://ballotpedia.org/School_responses_to_the_coronavirus_(COVID-19)_pandemic_during_the_2020-2021_academic_year.

Creswell

J. W., &

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Cross

J. R., &

Cross

T. L.

(2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x

Garn

A. C., &

Jolly

J. L.

(2014). High ability students’ voice on learning motivation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X 13513262.

Gewertz

(2020). Instruction during COVID-19: Reduced learning time drives fears of academic erosion. Education Week, 39(35).

(2019). Implementing resilience recommendations for policies and practices in gifted curriculum. Roeper Review, 41(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553216

Kanevsky

L., &

Keighley

(2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235

10.

Kitsantas

Bland

L., &

Chirinos

D. S.

(2017). Gifted students’ perceptions of gifted programs: An inquiry into their academic and social-emotional functioning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217717033

11.

Kuzujanakis

(2021). Anxiety in today’s children and young adults. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420934445

12.

Marshall

C., &

Rossman

(2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.

13.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.

14.

Morgan

(2014). Maximizing student success with differentiated Learning. Clearing House, 87(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2013.832130

15.

Moustakas

(1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

16.

Parks

(2009). Teaching analytical and critical thinking skills in gifted education. In Karnes

F. A.

Bean

S. M.

(Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd ed., pp. 261–300). Prufrock Press.

17.

Potts

J. A.

(2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218801075

18.

Potts

J. A., &

Potts

(2017). Is your gifted child ready for online learning? Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517722182

19.

Reis

S. M., &

Renzulli

J. S.

(2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012

20.

Rogers

K. B.

(2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Education Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306324

21.

Steenbergen-Hu

Makel

M. C., &

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on k–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta -analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417

22.

Struck

J. M., &

Little

C. A.

(2011). Integrating higher order process skills and content. In VanTassel-Baska

Little

C. A.

(Eds.), Content-based curriculum for high ability learners (2nd ed., pp. 71–100). Prufrock Press.

23.

Wiersma

(2000). Research methods in education. Allyn & Bacon.

24.

Zakreski

M. J.

(2018). When emotional intensity and cognitive rigidity collide: What can counselors and teachers do? Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518786984

25.

Zamfir

P. B.

(2020) Online learning - paradigm shift in the educational space. Annals of the “Constantin Brancusi” University of Targu Jiu-Letter & Social Sciences Series 2(2): 7–12.