A growing literature examines how online learning can incorporate culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) to provide high-quality, equitable education to all students with a particular focus on validating and integrating the unique needs and experiences of students from minoritized backgrounds and identities. This systematic review qualitatively analyzes how 42 studies suggest the CRP tenets of academic excellence, cultural competence, and critical consciousness can be incorporated into asynchronous, synchronous, or blended learning overall, by grade level, and online learning modality as well as differences between studies conducted before and during COVID-19. This analysis highlights specific strategies for integrating CRP tenets into online learning with innovative examples from research on how to do so. This synthesis emphasizes the need for further research on how online learning can integrate critical consciousness, particularly involving students in social justice work and power sharing with students.
AgustinaP. Z. R.ChengT.-H. (2020). How students’ perspectives about online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic?Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i3.46
2.
*AitkenS. C.PearsonE.HermanT. (2022). ‘“They think we’re just ghetto, but nah!”: Re-working young people’s presence. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 113(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12475
3.
*AllenN.RestaP. E.ChristalM. (2002). The role of technology in Native American schools. TechTrends, 46(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772078
4.
AnnammaS. A.FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2018). Disability critical race theory: Exploring the intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759041
5.
AronsonB.LaughterJ. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
6.
*BarmpoutisA.DingQ.AnthonyL.EugeneW.SuvajdzicM. (2016). Exploration of kinesthetic gaming for enhancing elementary math education using culturally responsive teaching methodologies [Conference session]. 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR) (pp. 1–4 IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/KELVAR.2016.7563674
7.
*BarzanòG.CortianaP.JamisonI.LissoniM.RaffioL. (2017). New means and new meanings for multicultural education in a global–Italian context. Multicultural Education Review, 9(3), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2017.1346554
8.
BenjaminR. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.
9.
BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.BorokhovskiE.WadeC. A.TamimR. M.SurkesM. A.BethelE. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
10.
BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.LouY.BorokhovskiE.WadeA.WozneyL.WalletP. A.FisetM.HuangB. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
11.
*BhatnagarR.ManyJ. (2022). Novice teachers’ use of culturally responsive pedagogies in high-needs schools during pandemic induced remote online instruction. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(2), 181–202. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/219880/
12.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE. (2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697–744. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862495
13.
BonillaS.DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2021). Ethnic studies increases longer-run academic engagement and attainment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), e2026386118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026386118
*BrownB.BodaP.RibayK.WilseyM.PerezG. (2021). A technological bridge to equity: How VR designed through culturally relevant principles impact students’ appreciation of science. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(4), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1948427
16.
*BrownB.PérezG.RibayK.BodaP. A.WilseyM. (2021). Teaching culturally relevant science in virtual reality: “When a problem comes, you can solve it with science.”Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1778248
17.
*BrownM. (2002). Multicultural education and technology: Perspectives to consider. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 51.
18.
*BrownT. M.SmithT. R.GabbardJ. L.GilbertJ. E. (2016). Augmenting mathematical education for minority students [Conference session]. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 260–264). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.24
19.
CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap. Oxford University Press.
*ChristalM. (2003). School-museum partnerships for culturally responsive teaching. The Electronic Library, 21(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470310499803
22.
*ChristalM.RoyL.CherianA. (2005). Stories told: Tribal communities and the development of virtual museums. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 7(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1300/J141v07n01_05
23.
Darling-AduanaJ. (2021). Development and validation of a measure of authentic online work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1729–1752.
24.
*Darling-AduanaJ.GoodA.GeraghtyE. (2022). The culture of power online: Cultural responsiveness and relevance in vendor-developed online courses. Urban Education, 57(4), 714–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920972169
25.
Darling-AduanaJ.HemingwayK. (2022). Representation is not enough: Teacher identity and discretion in an asynchronous, scripted online learning environment. Teachers College Record, 124(9), 91–121.
26.
Darling-AduanaJ.WoodyardH. T.SassT. R.BarryS. S. (2022). Learning-mode choice, student engagement, and achievement growth during the COVID-19 pandemic. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221128035
27.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216677002
28.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2021). My Brother’s Keeper? The impact of targeted educational supports. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(4), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22328
29.
*del RosalK.ConryJ.WuS. (2017). Exploring the fluid online identities of language teachers and adolescent language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(5), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1307855
30.
*DeVitoD.TellesT.SmithB. H. (2020). Culturally responsive research projects in a Title I elementary center for fine arts. Visions of Research in Music Education, 35, 11.
31.
DiPietroMFerdigR. E.BlackE. W.PrestonM. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers.”Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 10–35.
32.
*DreifussH. M.BelinK. L.WilsonJ.GeorgeS.WatersA.-R.KahnC. B.BauerM. C.Teufel-ShoneN. I. (2022). Engaging Native American high school students in public health career preparation through the Indigenous Summer Enhancement Program. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 789994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.789994
33.
*ElrickD.YuJ.HargraveC. (2018). Integrating online instruction and hands-on laboratory activities for summer learning for students of color: A design case in forensic science. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(3), 263–294.
34.
FüttererT.HochE.LachnerA.ScheiterK.StürmerK. (2023). High-quality digital distance teaching during COVID-19 school closures: Does familiarity with technology matter?Computers & Education, 199, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104788
35.
FrancoM. P.BottianiJ. H.BradshawC. P. (2024). Assessing teachers’ culturally responsive classroom practice in PK–12 schools: A systematic review of teacher-, student-, and observer-report measures. Review of Educational Research, 94(5), 743–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231208720
36.
GamageK. A.GamageA.DehideniyaS. C. (2022). Online and hybrid teaching and learning: Enhance effective student engagement and experience. Education Sciences, 12(10), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100651
37.
GardnerK.LearyH. (2023). Online learning for first-generation and underrepresented minoritized students: A literature review using a model of student engagement. Online Learning, 27(1), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3392
38.
*GartlandS. (2021). “Every day I’m happy to go to class and experience math”: Opportunities for equity within instruction that supports mathematical learning and social-emotional learning. University of Delaware.
39.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed). Teachers College.
40.
GearyE.AllenK.-A.GambleN.PahlevansharifS. (2023). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does social connectedness and learning community predict self-determined needs and course satisfaction?Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(1), 13. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol20/iss1/13
GleasonB.HeathM. K. (2021). Injustice embedded in Google Classroom and Google Meet: A techno-ethical audit of remote educational technologies. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 26–41.
43.
*GorskiP. C. (2004). Multicultural education and progressive pedagogy in the online information age. Multicultural Perspectives, 6(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327892mcp0604_10
44.
*GrantV. A. (2011). Virtual high school: Learning communities for American Indian students. University of St. Thomas.
45.
GutsteinE. R. (2016). “Our issues, our people—Math as our weapon”: Critical mathematics in a Chicago neighborhood high school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(5), 454–504. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.5.0454
46.
*HamlinJ.GibbonsC.LambrouA. (2021). Portraits across the distance: Connecting and collaborating through film and photography in a pandemic. Art Education, 74(6), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1954478
47.
HeinrichC. J.Darling-AduanaJ.GoodA.ChengH. (Emily). (2019). A look inside online educational settings in high school: Promise and pitfalls for improving educational opportunities and outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2147–2188. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219838776
48.
HollisterB.NairP.Hill-LindsayS.ChukoskieL. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
49.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
50.
*HossainM.AydinH. (2011). A Web 2.0-based collaborative model for multicultural education. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504971111142655
51.
HurshD. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306764
52.
*JacksonB. L.JonesW. M.SchadM.StrandD. (2021). Assessing K-12 online teachers’ knowledge of online student identities. Journal of Online Learning Research, 7(1), 35–56.
53.
*JohnsonC. C.WaltonJ. B.StricklerL.ElliottJ. B. (2023). Online teaching in K-12 education in the United States: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 353–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105550
54.
*JoinerC. B. (2021). A basic qualitative study investigating the implementation of culturally responsive teaching strategies during remote learning. Concordia University-Chicago.
55.
*Kaler-JonesC. J. (2021). “You can’t see me by looking at me”: Black girls; arts-based practices as mechanisms for identity construction and resistance. University of Maryland, College Park.
56.
*KierM. W.JohnsonL. L. (2022). Exploring how secondary STEM teachers and undergraduate mentors adapt digital technologies to promote culturally relevant education during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010048
57.
*KimS. J.SongA.LeeG.-L.BachA. (2018). Using animated folktales to teach cultural values: A case study with Korean-American bilingual Kindergartners. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1464528
58.
*LachneyM.BabbittW.BennettA.EglashR. (2021). Generative computing: African-American cosmetology as a link between computing education and community wealth. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1115–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636087
59.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1992). Culturally relevant teaching: The key to making multicultural education work. In GrantC. A. (Ed.), Research and multicultural education: From the margins to the mainstream (pp. 106–121). Falmer Press.
60.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
61.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236863
LambertS. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
64.
LareauA. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088916
65.
*LawrenceA. (2017). Toward culturally responsive online pedagogy: Practices of selected secondary online teachers. College of William & Mary.
66.
*LeibuB. L. (2021). Exploring diverse elementary students’ literacy development in a literacy club. Salisbury University.
67.
*LinW.-C.YangS.-C. (2015). Effects of online culturally responsive pedagogy: Collaborative learning between college tutors and Indigenous high school students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 223–253. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).08
68.
*MaunakeaS. P.SimanuC.Suluai-MahukaS. (2022). Culturally sustaining web 2.0 technology use in the Pacific: Innovations from American Samoa and Hawai‘i. Middle School Journal, 53(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2021.1999747
69.
McLarenP. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge.
70.
MitraD. L.GrossS. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209334577
71.
MolnarA.BoningerF. (2020). The commercial transformation of America’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(2), 8–13.
72.
MooreK. A.MarchE. (2022). Socially connected during COVID-19: Online social connections mediate the relationship between loneliness and positive coping strategies. Journal of Stress, Trauma, Anxiety, and Resilience (J-STAR), 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.55319/js.v1i1.9
73.
MorrisonK. A.RobbinsH. H.RoseD. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006
74.
*NierodaJ. L. (2019). American and Moroccan youths’ multiliteracies in cross-cultural photovoice project: A formative experiment. Syracuse University. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/998
ParkhouseH.BennettE.PandeyT.LeeK.Johnson WilsonJ. (2022). Culturally relevant education as a professional responsibility. Educational Researcher, 51(7), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221092390
77.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
78.
*RasmussenM. (2021). Implications of culturally relevant pedagogy in online environments where emergent bilinguals participate. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
79.
*RaynalA.LightD. (2021). Appropriating WhatsApp for learning: How preschool families increased their voices in remote instruction [Conference session]. 2021 Machine Learning-Driven Digital Technologies for Educational Innovation Workshop (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF53024.2021.9733777
80.
RiceM. F.CantergianiK.MaciasD. (2023). A research-based conceptual framework for inclusive K-12 online, distance, and digital education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(2), 482–498.
81.
RiceM. F.DunnM. (Eds.). (2023). Inclusive online and distance education for learners with dis/abilities: Promoting accessibility and equity. Taylor & Francis.
82.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. ERIC.
83.
*Serrano CorkinD. M.EkmekciA.FisherA. (2020). Integrating culture, art, geometry, and coding to enhance computer science motivation among underrepresented minoritized high school students. The Urban Review, 52(5), 950–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00586-8
84.
ShockleyK. M.GabrielA. S.RobertsonD.RosenC. C.ChawlaN.GansterM. L.EzerinsM. E. (2021). The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1137–1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000948
85.
SidiY.Shamir-InbalT.Eshet-AlkalaiY. (2023). From face-to-face to online: Teachers’ perceived experiences in online distance teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic. Computers & Education, 201, 104831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104831
TamimR. M.BernardR. M.BorokhovskiE.AbramiP. C.SchmidR. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
88.
*TartagliaJ.GigliaR.DarbyJ. (2022). Developing culturally appropriate food literacy resources for Aboriginal children with Foodbank WA’s Superhero Foods®. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 33(S1), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.584
89.
Tintiangco-CubalesA.KohliR.SacramentoJ.HenningN.Agarwal-RangnathR.SleeterC. (2015). Toward an ethnic studies pedagogy: Implications for K-12 schools from the research. The Urban Review, 47, 104–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0280-y
90.
*Vann-HamiltonJ. (2015). Under-represented students’ engagement in secondary science learning: A non-equivalent control group design [Doctor of Philosophy, Andrews University]. https://doi.org/10.32597/dissertations/1578
91.
VianoS. (2018). At-risk high school students recovering course credits online: What we know and need to know. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1412554
92.
*WalkerC. (2021). Beyond bandwidth: An examination of making learning accessible for all students [Georgia State University]. https://doi.org/10.57709/24129619
93.
*WarnerD. P. (2012). Indigepedia: Digital decolonization—Living histories of Native American peoples indigenizing K-12 curriculum in Washington state. Washington State University.
94.
WatsonJ. F. (2007). A national primer on K-12 online learning. North American Council for Online Learning.
95.
WatsonJ. F. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Promising Practices in Online Learning. North American Council for Online Learning.
96.
*WilliamsR. N. (2022). Investigating culturally responsive teaching in Jamaican secondary music classroom: A multiple case study. Boston University.
97.
*WoodleyX.HernandezC.ParraJ.NegashB. (2017). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0207-z
98.
XieJ.BashamJ. D.MarinoM. T.RiceM. F. (2018). Reviewing research on mobile learning in K–12 educational settings: Implications for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417732292
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
