Do High-Achieving Students Benefit From Honors College Participation? A Look at Student Engagement for First-Year Students and Seniors

Abstract

This study investigates findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), comparing various aspects of student engagement between honors college and general education students. Responses from 1,339 honors college students and 7,191 general education students across 15 different universities suggest a positive impact for honors college participation on reflective and integrative learning, use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, diverse discussions, student–faculty interaction, and quality of interactions for first-year students, even when controlling for student and institutional characteristics. For senior students, honors college participation was related to more frequent student–faculty interaction. Potential experiential and curricular reasons for these differences are discussed, along with implications for educators, researchers, parents, and students.

Keywords

honors college student engagement higher education survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anaya

(1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education, 40, 499–526.

Astin

A. W.

(1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Baird

(2005). College environments and climates: Assessments and their theoretical assumptions. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 10, pp. 507–537). Bodmin, Cornwall, Great Britain: Springer.

Blaich

Wise

(2011). From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons from the Wabash National Study. (NILOA Occasional Paper No. 8). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute of Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/Wabash_000.pdf

Bowman

N. A.

(2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 4–33.

Bowman

N. A.

(2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81, 29–68.

Bowman

N. A.

(2013). How much diversity is enough? The curvilinear relationship between college diversity interactions and first-year student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 54, 874–894.

BrckaLorenz

Ribera

Kinzie

Cole

(2012). Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement. To Improve the Academy, 31, 1–18.

Brint

Cantwell

A. M.

Hanneman

R. A.

(2008). The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 49, 383–402. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y

10.

Buckner

Shores

Sloane

Dantzler

Shields

(2016). Honors and non-honors student engagement: A model of student, curricular, and institutional characteristics. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 508. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/508/

11.

Cabrera

A. F.

Crissman

J. L.

Bernal

E. M.

Nora

Terenzini

P. T.

Pascarella

E. T.

(2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students’ development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 20–34.

12.

Cabrera

A. F.

Nora

Terenzini

P. T.

Pascarella

E. T.

Hagedorn

L. S.

(1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college: A comparison between white students and African-American students. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 134–160.

13.

Chesebro

J. L.

McCroskey

J. C.

(2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59–68.

14.

Clark

(2008). Motivational issues in the education of academically talented college students. In Clark

Zubizarreta

(Eds.), Inspiring exemplary teaching and learning: Perspectives on teaching academically talented college students (pp. 65–106). Lincoln, NE: National Collegiate Honors Council.

15.

Clarke

Crawford

Steele

Vignoles

(2010). The choice between fixed and random effects models: Some considerations for educational research (Discussion Paper Series No.5287). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

16.

Clayton

Blumberg

Auld

D. P.

(2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 349–364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00993.x

17.

Cockrell

K. S.

Caplow

J. A.

Donaldson

J. F.

(2000). A context for learning: Collaborative groups in the problem-based learning environment. Review of Higher Education, 23, 347–364. doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0008

18.

Cognard-Black

A. J.

Savage

(2016). Variability and similarity in honors curricula across institution size and type. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 521. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/521/

19.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Cole

(2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 249–281.

21.

Coleman

L. J.

Cross

T. L.

(2005). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

22.

Denson

(2009). Do curricular and cocurricular diversity activities influence racial bias? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 805–838.

23.

Denson

Chang

M. J.

(2009). Racial diversity matters: The impact of diversity-related student engagement and institutional context. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 322–353.

24.

Digby

(2005). Peterson’s honors programs: The official guide of the National Collegiate Honors Council (4th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.

25.

Dumford

A. D.

Cogswell

C. A.

Miller

A. L.

(2016). The who, what, and where of learning strategies. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 72–88.

26.

Fischer

(1996, September 16). The new honors programs. U.S. News & World Report, 121, 108–110.

27.

Flowers

L. A.

Pascarella

E. T.

(2003). Cognitive effects of college: Differences between African American and Caucasian students. Research in Higher Education, 44, 21–49.

28.

Fosnacht

Sarraf

Howe

Peck

(2017). How important are high response rates for college surveys? The Review of Higher Education, 40, 245–265.

29.

Freyman

(2005). What is an honors student? Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 154. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/154/

30.

Gagné

(1999). Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 194–234.

31.

Gagné

(2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 67–79). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

32.

Gagné

(2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

33.

Gagné

(2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In MacFarlane

Stambaugh

(Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61–80). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

34.

Gagné

(2018). The DMGT/IMTD: Building talented outputs out of gifted inputs. In Callahan

C. M.

Hertberg-Davis

H. L.

(Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 55–70). New York, NY: Routledge.

35.

Gelman

Hill

Yajima

(2012). Why we (usually) don’t have to worry about multiple comparisons. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 189–211. doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.618213

36.

Ginsberg

S. M.

(2007). Teacher transparency: What students can see from faculty communication. Journal of Cognitive Affective Learning, 4(1), 13–24.

37.

Goodsell

A. S.

(1992). Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.

38.

Goodstein

Szarek

(2013). They come, but do they finish? Program completion for honors students at a major public university, 1998–2010. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 398. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/398/

39.

Gurin

Dey

E. L.

Hurtado

Gurin

(2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–367.

40.

Hativa

(1998). Lack of clarity in university teaching: A case study. Higher Education, 36, 353–381.

41.

Hativa

Barak

Simhi

(2001). Exemplary university teachers: Knowledge and beliefs regarding effective teaching dimensions and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 699–729.

42.

Hayek

J. C.

Carini

R. M.

O’Day

P. T.

Kuh

G. D.

(2002). Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 643–663.

43.

Inkelas

K. K.

Weisman

J. L.

(2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 335–368. doi:10.1353/csd.2003.0027

44.

Kampfe

J. A.

Chasek

C. L.

Falconer

(2016). An examination of student engagement and retention in an honors program. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 515. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/515/

45.

Kim

Y. K.

Sax

L. J.

(2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50, 437–459.

46.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

47.

Kuh

G. D.

(1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 277–304.

48.

Kuh

G. D.

(2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University.

49.

Kuh

G. D.

(2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

50.

Kuh

G. D.

(2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20. doi:10.1002/ir.283

51.

Kuh

G. D.

Hall

J. E.

(1993). Cultural perspectives in student affairs work. In Kuh

G. D.

(Ed.), Cultural perspectives in student affairs work (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.

52.

Kuh

G. D.

(2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24, 309–332.

53.

Kuh

G. D.

Pace

Vesper

(1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38, 435–454.

54.

Lambert

A. D.

Miller

A. L.

(2014). Lower response rates on alumni surveys might not mean lower response representativeness. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(3), 38–51.

55.

Lau

L. K.

(2003). Institutional factors affecting student retention. Education, 124, 126–136.

56.

Lewis

Smith

(1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32, 131–137. doi:10.1080/00405849309543588

57.

Loes

Pascarella

Umbach

(2012). Effects of diversity experiences on critical thinking skills: Who benefits? The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 1–25.

58.

McMillan

J. H.

Schumacher

(2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York, NY: Longman.

59.

Miller

A. L.

(2012). Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 30–47.

60.

Miller

A. L.

Sarraf

S. A.

Dumford

A. D.

Rocconi

L. M.

(2016). Construct validity of NSSE Engagement Indicators (NSSE Psychometric Portfolio Report). Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research, School of Education. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_portfolio/Validity_ConstructValidity_FactorAnalysis_2013.pdf

61.

Miller

A. L.

Speirs Neumeister

K. L.

(2017). The influence of personality, parenting styles, and perfectionism on performance goal orientation in high ability students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28, 313–344. doi:10.1177/1932202X17730567

62.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2000). The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/NSSE%202000%20National%20Report.pdf

63.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009). Validity: 2009 Known groups validation (NSSE Psychometric Portfolio Report). Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_portfolio/Validity_GroupMembership.pdf

64.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2011). NSSE multi-year data analysis guide. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/2011_Institutional_Report/pdf/NSSE%20MYDAG.pdf

65.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2015). NSSE 2015 overview. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/2015_Institutional_Report/pdf/NSSE%202015%20Overview.pdf

66.

Nelson Laird

T. F

. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 46, 365–387.

67.

Nelson Laird

T. F.

Shoup

Kuh

G. D

. (2005, May). Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.

68.

Noldon

Sedlacek

W. E.

(1998). Gender differences in attitudes, skills, and behaviors among academically talented university freshmen. Roeper Review, 21, 106–1069.

69.

Ormrod

J. E.

(2011). Human learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

70.

Pace

C. R.

(1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.

71.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

72.

Pike

G. R.

(1991). The effects of background, coursework, and involvement on students’ grades and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 32, 16–30.

73.

Pike

G. R.

(1995). The relationship between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1–22.

74.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

75.

Quaye

S. J.

Harper

S. R.

(2015). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

76.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

77.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 51–92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

78.

Rinn

A. N.

(2004). Academic and social effects of living in honors residence halls. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 173. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/173/

79.

Rinn

A. N.

(2005). Trends among honors college students: An analysis by year in school. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 157–167. doi:10.4219/jsge-2005-479

80.

Rinn

A. N.

(2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232–245. doi:10.1177/0016986207302718

81.

Rinn

A. N.

(2008). Pre-college experiences and characteristics of gifted students. In Clark

Zubizarreta

(Eds.), Inspiring exemplary teaching and learning: Perspectives on teaching academically talented college students (pp. 9–17). Lincoln, NE: National Collegiate Honors Council.

82.

Rinn

A. N.

Plucker

J. A.

(2004). We recruit them, but then what? The educational and psychological experiences of academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 54–67.

83.

Rocconi

L. M.

Gonyea

R. M.

(2015, May). Contextualizing student engagement effect sizes: An empirical analysis. Paper session presented at the Association for Institutional Research Conference, Denver, CO.

84.

Rocconi

L. M.

Lambert

A. D.

McCormick

A. C.

Sarraf

S. A.

(2013). Making college count: An examination of quantitative reasoning activities in higher education. Numeracy, 6(2), 1–20. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.10

85.

Schuman

(2006). Beginning in honors: A handbook (Monograph Series, Paper 7). National Collegiate Honors Council. Lincoln, Nebraska: Digital Commons at University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmono/7

86.

Sederberg

(2005). Characteristics of the contemporary honors college: A descriptive analysis of a survey of NCHC member colleges. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 180. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/180/

87.

Seifert

T. A.

Pascarella

E. T.

Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

(2007). The effects of honors program participation on experiences of good practices and learning outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 57–74. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0007

88.

Shushok

(2006). Student outcomes and honors programs: A longitudinal study of 172 honors students 2000–2004. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 15. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/15/

89.

Slavin

Coladarci

Pratt

P. A.

(2008). Is student participation in an honors program related to retention and graduation rates? Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 66. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/66/

90.

Smith

K. A.

Sheppard

S. D.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 87–101. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x

91.

Snijders

Bosker

R. J.

(2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic & advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.

92.

Stassen

M. L. A.

(2003). Student outcomes: The impact of varying living-learning community models. Research in Higher Education, 44, 581–613. doi:10.1023/A:1025495309569

93.

Steen

L. A.

(1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.

94.

Steen

L. A.

(2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.

95.

Streznewski

M. K.

(1999). Gifted grownups: The mixed blessings of extraordinary potential. New York, NY: John Wiley.

96.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056

97.

Syer

C. A.

Chichekian

Shore

Aulls

M. A.

(2013). Learning “to do” and learning “about” inquiry at the same time: Different outcomes in valuing the importance of various intellectual tasks in planning, enacting, and evaluating an inquiry curriculum. Instructional Science, 41, 521–537. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9242-5

98.

Thomas

S. L.

Heck

R. H.

(2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42, 517–540.

99.

Tinto

(1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599–623. doi:10.1080/00221546.1997.11779003

100.

Umbauch

P. D.

Wawrzynski

M. R.

(2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184.

101.

Vermetten

Y. J.

Lodewijks

H. G.

Vermunt

J. D.

(1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37, 1–21.

102.

Vermunt

J. D.

(1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.

103.

Volkwein

Carbone

(1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 147–167.

104.

Webber

K. L.

Krylow

R. B.

Zhang

(2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 591–611. doi:10.1353/csd.2013.0090

105.

Weiss

R. E.

(2003). Designing problems to promote higher-order thinking. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2003(95), 25–31. doi:10.1002/tl.109

106.

Whitt

E. J.

Edison

Pascarella

E. T.

Nora

Terenzini

P. T.

(1999). Interactions with peers and objective and self-reported cognitive outcomes across 3 years of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 61–78.

107.

Wilkins

J. L. M.

(2000). Preparing for the 21st century: The status of quantitative literacy in the United States. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 406–418. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17329.x

108.

Wilkins

J. L. M.

(2010). Modeling quantitative literacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 267–290. doi:10.1177/0013164409344506

109.

Young

J. H.

Story

Tarver

Weinauer

Keeler

(2016). The honors college experience reconsidered: Exploring the student perspective. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive, Paper 524. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/524/