The provision of gifted students with learning difficulties (GSLD) composes a complicated educational problem that deserves special care. This study explores teachers’ attitudes towards the GSLD in two samples of primary school teachers: 225 Greek teachers and 158 teachers in the Czech Republic, 40–59 years of age and with 14–28 years of teaching experience. A questionnaire of 26 questions, created for the purpose of this study, was administered referring to teachers’ attitudes towards opinions and information regarding the GSLD characteristics, along with three open-ended questions on the most preferable types of the GSLD educational provision. Through multidimensional scaling solutions in their trigonometric transformation (MDS-T) one large common and one minor separate system of items emerged for the two samples, which were meaningful in the direction of understanding teachers’ difficulties in accepting the contradictory core of the GSLD characteristics and educational needs. These systems of attitudes are discussed in respect to their relative importance to Czech and Greek teachers and the respective educational settings.
AssoulineSNicponMHuberD (2006) The impact of vulnerabilities and strengths on the academic experiences of twice-exceptional students: A message to school counselors. Professional School Counseling10(1): 14–24.
2.
BaumS (1990) Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox. Gifted Education Digests. ERIC Digests on Gifted and Talented, ERIC EC Digest #E479. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. Available at: http://ericec.org (accessed 8 November 2013)
3.
BaumMSCooperRCNeuWT (2001) Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools38(5): 477–490.
4.
BlacherJ (2002) Twice – exceptional: Learning disabled and gifted. The Exceptional Parent32(9): 100–103.
5.
BrodyLEMillsCJ (1997) Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities30(3): 282–286.
6.
ChanDW (2000) Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self – reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies11(1): 69–82.
7.
ClineSHegemanK (2001) Gifted children with disabilities. Gifted Child Today24(3): 16–24.
8.
ColemanMHarradineCKingE (2005) Meeting the needs of students who are twice exceptional. Teaching Exceptional Children38(1): 5–6.
9.
Crepeau-HobsonFBiancoM (2011) Identification of gifted students with learning disabilities in a response-to-intervention era. Psychology in the Schools48(2): 102–109.
10.
DanielsRP (1991) Educating the learning-disabled child. In: MilgramMR (ed.) Counseling gifted and talented children. A guide for teachers, counselors and parents. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 207–222.
11.
DavisGARimmSB (1998) Education of the gifted and talented. 4th edn., Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
12.
DeshlerDDBulgrenJ (1997) Redefining instructional directions for gifted students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal8: 121–132.
13.
DoleS (2001) Reconciling contradictions: Identity formation in individuals with giftedness and learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted25(2): 103–137.
14.
EllstonT (1993) Gifted and learning disabled … a paradox?Gifted Child Today16(1): 17–19.
15.
EverittBS (1996) Making sense of statistics in psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
FerriBGreggNHeggoyS (1997) Profiles of college students demonstrating learning disabilities with and without giftedness. Journal of Learning Disabilities30: 552–559.
17.
FetzerAE (2000) The gifted/learning-disabled child: A guide for teachers and parents. Gifted Child Today23(4): 44–50.
18.
GardynikUMcDonaldL (2005) Implications of risk and resilience in the life of the individual who is gifted/learning disabled. Roeper Review27(4): 206–214.
19.
GariATsigriCh (2009) Charismatiki mathites kai mathisiakes dyskolies sti sholiki koinotita: Diaforetikes anages kai dyskolies [Gifted students with learning difficulties in school community: Different needs and difficulties]. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society16(4): 439–454.
20.
GariAKalantzi-AziziAMylonasK (2000) Adaptation and motivation of Greek gifted pupils: Exploring some influences of primary schooling. High Ability Studies11(1): 55–68.
21.
GariAKotsifakouPNikolopoulouV (2008) The Greek teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted students with learning disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the European Council for High Ability, (eds RaffanJMFořtikováJ), Prague, The Czech Republic, 16–20 September 2008, selected research papers cd-rom.
22.
JarkovskáLLiškováK (2008) Genderové aspekty českého školství [Gender aspects of Czech education]. Sociologický Časopis44(4): 683–701.
23.
LittleC (2001) A closer look at gifted children with disabilities. Gifted Child Today24(3): 46–53.
24.
LovettBJLewandowskiLJ (2006) Gifted students with learning disabilities: Who are they?Journal of Learning Disabilities39(6): 515–527.
25.
McCoachDBKehleTJBrayMA. (2001) Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools38(5): 403–411.
26.
MylonasK (2009) Statistical analysis techniques based on cross-cultural research methods: Cross-cultural paradigms and intra-country comparisons. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society16(2): 185–204.
27.
MylonasKGariAPanagiotopoulouP. (2011) Bias in terms of culture: Work values country-clustering for 33 European countries and Person-Job Fit factor equivalence testing for four European countries. In: DeutchJBoehnkeMKühnenU. (eds) Rendering borders obsolete: Cross-cultural and cultural psychology as an interdisciplinary, multi-method endeavour. Bremen, Germany: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Retrieved fromwww.iaccp.org (Last accessed 16 September 2013).
28.
NeihartM (2008) Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children. In: PfeifferSI (ed.) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Psycho-educational theory, research and best practices. New York: Springer, pp. 115–137.
29.
NielsenME (2002) Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal10(2): 93–111.
30.
PattonJDowdyCPollowayE. (2005) Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings, mylabschool edition. 4th edn, Paris: Lavoisier Librairie.
Portešovአ(2011) Rozumově nadané děti s dyslexií [Gifted children with dyslexia]. Prague: Portál.
33.
RiveraDBMurdockJSextonD (1995) Serving the gifted/learning disabled. Gifted Child Today18(6): 34–37.
34.
RosnerSSeymourJ (1983) The gifted child with a learning disability: Clinical evidence. In: FoxLHBrodyLETobinD (eds) Learning disabled/giftedchildren: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 77–97.
35.
SchultzMS (2012) Twice-exceptional students enrolled in advanced placement classes. Gifted Child Quarterly56(3): 119–133.
36.
Sidiropoulou-DimakakouDMylonasKArgyropoulouK (2008) Holland’s hexagonal personality model for a sample of Greek university students. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guidance8: 111–125.
TannenbaumAJBaldwinLJ (1983) Giftedness and learning disability: A paradoxical combination. In: FoxLHBrodyLETobinD (eds) Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 11–36.
39.
VolkerMALopataCCook-CottoneC (2006) Assessment of children with intellectual giftedness and reading disabilities. Psychology in the Schools43(8): 855–869.
40.
WeinfeldRRobinson-BarnesLJewelerS. (2002) Academic programs for gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review24(4): 226–233.
WinebrennerS (2003) Teaching strategies for twice-exceptional students. Intervention in School and Clinic38(3): 131–137.
43.
YewchuckCLupartJ (2002) Inclusive education for gifted students with disabilities. In: HellerAKMonksJFSternbergJR (eds) International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 659–670.
