This article examines whether giftedness is actually a gift for those who receive it. The following attributes of a true gift are described as: (1) an understanding of what the gift is and who owns it; (2) realizing that it needs maintenance; (3) knowing what to do with the gift; (4) the giver expects nothing in return; and (5) the receiver appreciates having the gift. Next, each attribute is related to empirical and theoretical work on giftedness. Finally, based on a synthesis of the previous sections, the question of whether giftedness really is a gift is answered and recommendations are made.
BeghettoRAKaufmanJC (2007) Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for ‘mini-c’ creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts1: 13–79.
2.
BorlandJH (1989) Planning and Implementing Programs for the Gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
BowlbyJ (1988) A Secure Base: Parent–Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. London: Routledge.
4.
BrodyLE (2009) The Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model for identifying and developing exceptional mathematical and verbal abilities. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 999–1016.
5.
ColangeloNAssoulineS (2009) Acceleration: Meeting the academic and social needs of students. In: ShavininaLV (ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 1085–1098.
6.
CrossTL (2005) The Social and Emotional Lives of Gifted Kids: Understanding and Guiding their Development. Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press, Inc.
7.
DaiDY (2009) Essential tensions surrounding the concept of giftedness. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 39–80.
8.
DavidsonJE (1986) The role of insight in giftedness. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–222.
9.
DelisleJ (1984) Gifted Children Speak Out. New York: Walker & Co.
10.
EricssonKANandagopalKRoringRW (2005) Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted28: 287–311.
11.
FreemanC (1999) Crystallizing experience: A study in musical precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly43: 75–85.
12.
GardnerH (1983) Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
13.
GardnerH (1993) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences(10th anniversary edition). New York: Basic Books.
GrossMUM (1994) Factors in the social adjustment and social acceptability of extremely gifted children. In: ColangeloNAssoulineSGAmbrosonDL (eds) Talent Development, Volume 2
. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press, pp. 473–476.
16.
HellerKAPerlethCLimTK (2005) The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–170.
17.
HertzogNB (2009) The arbitrary nature of giftedness. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 205–214.
18.
JohnsenSK (2004) Identifying Gifted Students: A Practical Guide. Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press, Inc.
19.
KaufmanJCKaufmanSBBeghettoRA. (2009) Creative giftedness: Beginnings, developments, and future promises. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 585–598.
20.
KleinAGZehmsD (1996) Self-concept and gifted girls: A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades 3, 5, 8. Roeper Review19(1): 30–34.
21.
LoveckyDV (1994) Exceptionally gifted children: Different minds. Roeper Review17: 116–120.
22.
LuftigRNicholsM (1991) An assessment of the social status and perceived personality and school traits of gifted students by non-gifted. Roeper Review13: 138–153.
23.
LupartJLToyRE (2009) Twice exceptional: Multiple pathways to success. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 507–525.
24.
MahoneyAS (1998) In search of the gifted identity: From abstract concept to workable counseling constructs. Roeper Review20: 222–226.
25.
MonksFJ (1992) Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and programming. In MonksF.J.PetersW.A.M. (Eds.),Talent for the future (pp. 191-202). Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
26.
MorelockMJ (1996) On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review19(1): 4–12.
27.
ParkerWDMillsCJ (1996) The incidence of perfectionism in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly40: 194–199.
28.
PerssonRS (2009) The unwanted gifted and talented: A sociobiological perspective of the societal functions of giftedness. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 913–924.
29.
PluckerJALevyJJ (2001) The downside of being talented. American Psychologist56: 75–76.
30.
PyrytMC (2009) Recent developments in technology: Implications for gifted education. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 1173–1180.
31.
ReichenbergALandauE (2009) Families of gifted children. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 873–883.
32.
RenzulliJS (1986) The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–92.
33.
RenzulliJS (2005) The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–279.
34.
RoedellW (1984) Vulnerabilities of highly gifted children. Roeper Review6: 127–130.
35.
RossPOC (1993) National Excellence: A Case for Developing America’s Talent. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
36.
RuncoMA (2005) Creative giftedness. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–311.
37.
SaylerMF (2009) Gifted and thriving: A deeper understanding of meaning of GT. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 215–230.
38.
ShaughnessyMF (2003) A reflective conversation with James Gallagher. Gifted Education International18(1): 106–111.
39.
ShoreBM (2000) Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how the gifted think. In: FreidmanRCShoreBM (eds) Talents Unfolding: Cognition and Development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 167–187.
40.
SilvermanLK (1986) What happens to the gifted girl? In: MakerCJ (ed.) Critical Issues in Gifted Education, Vol. 1: Defensible Programs for the Gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, pp. 43–89.
41.
SilvermanLK (1993) The gifted individual. In: SilvermanLK (ed.) Counseling the Gifted & Talented. Denver, CO: Love Publishing, pp. 3–28.
42.
SilvermanLKMillerNB (2009) A feminine perspective of giftedness. In: ShavininaLV (ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 99–128.
43.
SimontonDK (2009) Genius 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
44.
SternbergRJ (2003) WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies14(2): 109–137.
45.
SternbergRJ (2005) The WICS model of giftedness. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 327–342.
46.
StoegerHZieglerA (2005) Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal6: 261–271.
47.
TermanLM (1925) Genetic Studies of Genius: Vol. 1. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
US Congress (1988) Jacob J. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act of 1988(Title IV-H. R. 5). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
49.
WaltersJGardnerH (1986) The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. In: SternbergRJDavidsonJE (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 306–330.
50.
WinnerE (1996) Gifted Children: Myths and Realities. New York: Basic Books.
51.
WinnerE (2000) The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist55: 159–169.
