There is ample evidence that families are important in supporting the development of giftedness in children. Although there has been a great deal of research addressing individual and school factors in promoting giftedness, the role of parents and caregivers is comparatively underresearched, particularly in Australia. This study investigated the ways in which parents supported their children’s development, drawing on the educational and learning capital framework within the Actiotope Model of Giftedness. A qualitative design was adopted and semistructured interviews were conducted with 32 parents and caregivers. The data demonstrated that parents draw on all 10 educational and learning resources in creating favorable environments to support their children’s development.
Al-ShabatatA. M.AbbasM.IsmailH. N. (2009). The direct and indirect effects of environmental factors on nurturing intellectual giftedness. International Journal of Special Education, 24, 121–131.
2.
AlvaradoN. (1989). Adjustment of adults who are gifted. Advanced Development, 1, 77–86.
3.
AndersY.RossbachH.WeinertS.EbertS.KugerS.LehrlS.von MauriceJ. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 231–244.
4.
AspesiC. C.FleithD. S. (2006). Family processes and development of giftedness. Gifted Education International, 20, 19–31.
5.
BloomB. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine.
6.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
8.
CastroM.Exposito-CasasE.Lopez-MartinE.LizasoainL.Navarro-AsencioE.GaviriaJ. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46.
9.
ChagasJ. F.FleithD. S. (2009). Comparative study on giftedness with socio-economically disadvantaged families. Revista Brasileira De Educacao Especial, 15, 155–170.
10.
ChanD. (2005). Family environment and talent development of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 211–222.
11.
ChoS.HanS.FreeleyM. E. (2012). Development of leadership of former and prospective science Olympians and general students: Examining contributions of personal characteristics and family processes. Talent Development & Excellence, 4, 127–141.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (1993). Family influences on the development of giftedness. In BockG. R.AckrillK. (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 187–200). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DandyJ.NettelbeckT. (2002). A cross-cultural study of parents’ academic standards and educational aspirations for their children. Educational Psychology, 22, 621–627.
15.
DeFlorioL.BeliakoffA. (2015). Socioeconomic status and preschoolers’ mathematical knowledge: The contribution of home activities and parent beliefs. Early Education and Development, 26, 319–341.
16.
DignathC.BuettnerG.LangfeldtH.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation learning programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.
17.
FeatherN. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 239–267. doi:10.1080/00049538908260088
18.
FerreiraJ. F. C.FleithD. S. (2012). Characteristics and dynamics of the family of talented. Estudos de Psicologia, 17, 15–23.
19.
GagnéF. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GrossM. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
21.
HattB. (2012). Smartness as a cultural practice in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 438–460.
22.
HellerK. A. (2010). The Munich model of giftedness and talent. In HellerK. A.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Munich studies of giftedness: Talent, expertise, excellence (Vol. 6, pp. 3–12). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
23.
HellerK. A.PerlethC.LimT. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 147–170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KarnesF. A.D’IlioV. R. (1989). Student leaders’ and their parents’ perceptions of the home environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 165–168.
25.
KhooS.-W.BirrellB. (2002). The progress of young people of migrant origin in Australia. People and Place, 10, 30–44.
26.
LandauE.WeisslerK. (1993). Parental environment in families with gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Psychology, 127, 129–143.
27.
LeeJ.BowenN. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 193–218.
28.
MalikR. S. (1998, December). Accounting for the differential academic performance: A case of the Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian children. Paper presented to the 29th Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide.
29.
McInerneyD. M. (2008). Personal investment, culture and learning: Insights into school achievement across Anglo, Indigenous, Asian and Lebanese students in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 870–879.
30.
McIntoshD. E.DixonF. A.PiersonE. E. (2012). Use of intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 623–642). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
MelhuishE.SylvaK.SammonsP.Siraj-BlatchfordI.TaggartB.PhanM. (2008). Effects of home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 95–114.
32.
MillerE. M.CohenL. M. (2012). Engendering talent in others: Expanding domains of giftedness and creativity. Roeper Review, 34, 104–113.
33.
National Association for Gifted Children, & Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (2009). State of the states in gifted education: National policy and practice data 2008–2009. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2000). The transition from childhood giftedness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports. Roeper Review, 23, 65–71.
35.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). Parenting and optimal family environments for talent development. In NeihartM.PfeifferS.CrossT. L. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed., pp. 205–215). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
36.
OtsukaS.SmithI. D. (2005). Educational applications of the expectancy-value model of achievement motivation in the diverse cultural contexts of the west and the east. Change: Transformations in Education, 8, 91–109.
37.
PhillipsonS. (2013). Parental expectations: The influence of the significant other on school achievement. In PhillipsonS.KuK. Y. L.PhillipsonS. N. (Eds.), Constructing educational achievement: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 87–104). London, England: Routledge.
38.
PhillipsonS.RichardsG.SullivanP. (2017). Parental perceptions of access to capitals and early mathematical learning: Some early insights from Numeracy@Home Project. In PhillipsonS.GervasoniA.SullivanP. (Eds.), Engaging families as children’s first mathematics educators: International perspectives (pp. 127–145). Singapore: Springer.
39.
PhillipsonS.YickS. Y. J. (2013). Parental involvement within the Actiotope Model of Giftedness: What it means for East-Asian students. In PhillipsonS. N.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness (pp. 167–187). London, England: Routledge.
40.
RitchieJ.LewisJ. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, England: Sage.
41.
RobinsonN. M.LanziR. G.WeinbergR. A.RameyS. L.RameyC. T. (2002). Family factors associated with high academic competence in former Head Start children at third grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 278–290.
42.
RuncoM. A.AlbertR. S. (2005). Parents’ personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 355–368.
43.
SeeB. H.GorardS. (2015). The role of parents in young people’s education—A critical review of the causal evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 41, 346–366.
44.
Siraj-BlatchfordI. (2010). Learning in the home and at school: How working class children “succeed against the odds.”British Educational Research Journal, 36, 463–482.
45.
SnowC.Van HemelS. (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why what and how? Report of the Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
46.
SternbergR. J. (2010). Assessment of gifted students for identification purposes: New techniques for a new millennium. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 327–336.
47.
StewartR. E.PorathM. (1999). From childhood rags to adult riches: A case study. High Ability Studies, 10, 197–211.
48.
StoegerH.SteinbachJ.ObergriesserS.MatthesB. (2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: The individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness?High Ability Studies, 25, 5–21.
49.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1997). Restructuring special programs to reflect the distinctions between children’s and adult’s experiences with giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3–4), 101–116.
50.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.ArnoldK. D. (2003). Beyond Bloom: Revisiting environmental factors that enhance or impede talent development. In BorlandJ. H. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 227–238). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
51.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54.
52.
VialleW. (2013). The “tiger mother” factor: Curriculum, schooling and mentoring of Asian students in an Australian context. In PhillipsonS. N.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness (pp. 147–166). London, England: Routledge.
53.
VialleW.RogersK. B. (2009). Educating the gifted learner. Tuggerah, Australia: David Barlow.
54.
WeisslerK.LandauE. (1993). Characteristics of families with no, one, or more than one gifted child. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 143–152.
55.
WormaldC. M. (2009). An enigma: Barriers to the identification of gifted students with a learning disability (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Wollongong, Australia.
56.
ZieglerA. (2005). The Actiotope Model of Giftedness. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411–436). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
ZieglerA.BakerJ. (2013). Talent development as adaptation: The role of educational and learning capital. In PhillipsonS.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness (pp. 18–39). London, England: Routledge.
58.
ZieglerA.ChandlerK.VialleW.StoegerH. (2017). Exogenous and endogenous learning resources in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness and its significance for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 310–333.
59.
ZieglerA.StoegerH. (2008). A learning oriented subjective action space as an indicator of giftedness. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 222–236.
60.
ZieglerA.VialleW.WimmerB. (2013). The Actiotope Model of Giftedness: A short introduction to some central theoretical assumptions. In PhillipsonS.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness (pp. 1–17). London, England: Routledge.
61.
ZimmermanB.RingleJ. (1981). Effects of model persistence and statement of confidence on children’s self-efficacy and problem-solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 485–493.
62.
ZukovićS.MilutinovićJ. J. (2015). Supporting the development of potential giftedness in family and institutional contexts. Annual Review of the Faculty of Philosophy/Godisnjak Filozofskog Fakulteta, 40, 65–79.
