This paper, written by two social scientists, presents a social science perspective on the issues raised at the FRAME symposium on Human Alternatives to Animal Studies. Drawing upon the authors’ experience of conducting research with stem cell scientists, issues around access to human tissue for in vitro uses are considered. The paper concludes by raising questions pertinent to both interested social scientists and the Three Rs agenda.
StephensN., AtkinsonP. & GlasnerG. (2008). The UK Stem Cell Bank: Securing the past, validating the present, protecting the future. Science as Culture17, 43–56.
2.
StephensN., AtkinsonP. & GlasnerG. (2008). The UK Stem Cell Bank as performative architecture. New Genetics & Society27, 87–98.
3.
HarringtonJ. (2009). Translational Space: The Science Around Stem Cell Research, Using the Heart as a Case Study, 276pp. PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, UK: University of Exeter.
LynchM. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science18, 265–289.
7.
BirkeL., ArlukeA. & MichaelM. (2007). The Sacrifice: How Scientific Experiments Transform Animals and People, 224pp. West Lafayette, Indiana, USA: Purdue University Press.
8.
DespretV. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society10 (2–3), 111–134.
LeenaarsM., SavenijeB., NagtegaalA., van der VaartL. & Ritskes-HoitingaM. (2009). Assessing the search for and implementation of the Three Rs: A survey among scientists. ATLA37, 297–305.
