A database of over 280 chemicals has been compiled by using a mouse 3T3-L1 fibroblast-like cell line in exponential growth, exposed to chemicals for 72 hours in a 96-well tissue culture plate format, and determining cell number via the Kenacid blue (KB) assay for total protein. Ranking the chemicals according to their basal cytotoxicity, expressed as the concentration (mM) that inhibits increase in total cellular protein over 72 hours by 50% (the ID50 value) shows a wide range of ID50 values, from 0.00003mM to 10,096mM. This information includes the results for MEIC chemicals 1–50, and we have now added basal cytotoxicity data for 23 of the next 25 MEIC chemicals. When the neutral red uptake (NRU) assay was performed with the same cell cultures, before the KB assay, very similar indications of basal cytotoxicity were obtained. Comparisons between the results with 3T3-L1 cells and with a human fibroblast-like cell line, BCL-D1 showed a significant difference in order of magnitude of the ID50 value for only 5 of 52 chemicals. However, there was a difference in ID50 value of more than one order of magnitude for 8 of 24 chemicals tested with an undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cell line, F9.
ClothierR.H., AtkinsonK.A., GarleM.J., WardR.K., & WilishawA. (1995). The development and evaluation of in vitro tests by the FRAME Alternatives Laboratory. ATLA23, 75–90.
2.
ClothierR.H., HulmeL., AhmedA.B., ReevesH.L., SmithM., & BallsM. (1988). In vitro cytotoxicity of 150 chemicals to 3T3-L1 cells, assessed by the FRAME Kenacid Blue Method. ATLA16, 84–95.
3.
HulmeL.M., ReevesH.L., ClothierR.H., SmithM., & BallsM. (1987). An assessment of two alternative methods for predicting the in vivo toxicities of metallic compounds. Molecular Toxicology1, 589–596.
4.
ClothierR.H. (1995). The FRAME cytotoxicity test (Kenacid Blue). In In Vitro Toxicity Testing Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology 43 (ed. HareS.O., and AtterwillC.), pp. 109–118. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
5.
KnoxP., UphillP.F., FryJ.R., BenfordJ., & BallsM. (1986). The FRAME multicentre project on in vitro cytotoxicology. Food and Chemical Toxicology24, 457–463.
6.
RiddellR.J., ClothierR.H., & BallsM. (1986). Evaluation of three in vitro cytotoxicity assays. Food and Chemical Toxicology24, 469–471.
7.
RiddellR.J., PanacerD.S., WildeS.M., ClothierR.H., & BallsM. (1986). The importance of exposure period and cell type in in vitro cytotoxicity tests. ATLA14, 86–92.
8.
BorenfreundE., & PuernerJ.A. (1985). Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alteration and neutral red adsorption. Toxicology Letters24, 119–124.
9.
SeibertH., BallsM., FentemJ.H., BianchiV., ClothierR.H., DierickxP.J., EkwallB., GarleM.J., Gomez-LechonM.J., GiribaldoL., GuldenM., LiebschM., RasmussenE., RoguetR., ShrivastavaR., & WalumE. (1996). Acute toxicity testing in vitro and the classification and labelling of chemicals. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 16. ATLA24, 499–510.
10.
ClemedsonC., McFarlane-AbdullaE., AnderssonM., BarileF.A., CallejaM.C., ChesnesC., ClothierR. (1996). MEIC evaluation of systemic toxicity. Part 1. Methodology of 68 in vitro toxicity assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals. ATLA24, 251–272.
11.
ClemedsonC., McFarlane-AbdullaE., AnderssonM., BarileF.A., CallejaM.C., ChesnesC., ClothierR. (1996). MEIC evaluation of systemic toxicity. Part 2. In vitro results from 68 toxicity assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals and a comparative analysis. ATLA24, 273–311.
12.
Anon. (2001). Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. COM(2001) 88 final, 321 pp. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
13.
ClothierR.H., HulmeL.M., SmithM., & BallsM. (1987). A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicities and acute in vivo toxicities of 59 chemicals. Molecular Toxicology1, 571–577.
14.
LewisR.J., & TatkenR.L., eds. (1982). Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS).Washington, DC, USA: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Now distributed by MDL Information Systems, Inc. Website http://library.dialog.com/bluesheets/html/bl0336.html.
15.
StricklandJ.A., StokesW.S., CasatiS., ParisM.W., WorthA.P., RaabeH., CaoC., ClothierR., HarbellJ., CurrenR., HasemanJ., & TiceR.R. (2003). Design of a validation study to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity assays for predicting rodent and human acute systemic toxicity. Toxicologist72, 157, Abstract 761.
16.
AtkinsonK., HulmeL., ClothierR.H., & BallsM. (1989). In vitro cytotoxicity of 24 chemicals to mouse teratocarcinoma cells. ATLA17, 34–37.
17.
ClothierR.H., HornerS., & BallsM. (1985). Effects of antibiotics and organic solvents on the in vitro cytotoxicity of other chemicals. ATLA12, 203–213.
18.
HubbardA.W., MooreL.J., ClothierR.H., SulleyH., & RollinK. (1994). The use of in vitro methodology to predict the irritancy potential of surfactants. Toxicology in Vitro8, 689–691.
19.
BallsM., RiddellR.J., HornerS.H., & ClothierR.H. (1987). The FRAME approach to the development, validation and evaluation of in vitro alternative methods. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 5, Approaches to Validation (ed. GoldbergA. M.), pp. 45–58. New York, NY, USA: Mary Ann Liebert Inc.
20.
StarkD.M., ShopsisC., BorenfreundE., & BabichH. (1986). Progress and problems in evaluating and validating alternative assays in toxicology. Food and Chemical Toxicology24, 449–455.
21.
HornerS.H., FryJ.R., ClothierR.H., & BallsM. (1987). The detection of cytotoxicity produced by short-lived reactive intermediates: a study with bromobenzene. Xenobiotica17, 777–782.
22.
HornerS.H., ZuccoK., FryJ.R., ClothierR.H., & BallsM. (1987). Investigation of the cytotoxicity produced by generation of short-lived, reactive metabolites in vitro: A study with paracetamol. Toxicology in Vitro1, 133–138.
23.
ClemedsonC., AnderssonM., AokiY., BarileF.A., BassiA.M., CallejaM.C., CastanoA., ClothierR.H. (1998). MEIC evaluation of systemic toxicity. Part 4. In vitro results from 67 toxicity assays used to test reference chemicals 31–50 and a comparative analysis. ATLA26, 131–183.
24.
BallsM., BothamP.A., BrunerL.H., & SpielmannH. (1995). The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro8, 871–929.
25.
BrantomP.O., BrunerL.H., ChamberlainM., de SilvaO., DupuisJ., EarlL.K., LovellD.P., PapeW.J.W., UttleyM., BagleyD.M., BakerF.W., BracherM., CourtellemontP., DeclercqL., FreemanS., SteilingW., WalkerA.P., CarrG.J., DamiN., ThomasG., HarbellJ., JonesP.A., PfannenbeckerU., SoutheeJ.A., TchengM., ArgembeauxH., CastelliD., ClothierR., EsdaileD.J., ItigakiH., JungK., KasaiY., KojimaH., KristenU., LamicolM., LewisR.W., MarenusK., MorenoO., PetersonA., RasmussenE.S., RoblesC., & SternM. (1997). A summary report of the COLIPA International Validation study on Alternatives to the Draize Rabbit Eye Irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro11, 141–179.
26.
SmithL., ClothierR.H., HillidgeS., & BallsM. (1992). Modification of the FRAME Kenacid Blue Method for cytotoxicity tests on volatile materials. ATLA20, 230–234.
27.
EkwallB. (1999). Overview of the final MEIC results: II. The in vitro–in vivo evaluation, including the selection of a practical battery of cell tests for prediction of acute lethal blood concentrations in humans. Toxicology in Vitro13, 665–673.
28.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., PechovitchG., De SilvaO., HolzhutterH-G., ClothierR., DesolleP., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ.M., CasatoM., SladowskiD., SteilingW., & BrantomP. (1998). The international EU/COLIPA in vitro photoirritancy validation study: Results of Phase II (Blind trial), Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity test. Toxicology in Vitro12, 305–327.
