The effects of reactive oxygen species (including singlet oxygen) in two in vitro phototoxicity assays — the 3T3 cell neutral red uptake phototoxicity (3T3 NRU PT) assay and the photohaemolysis assay — were assessed by using scavengers. Fifteen test substances, which had previously been shown to be phototoxic in vitro, were assessed. Eleven of these produced singlet oxygen. The major factor in the photodynamic reaction of bithionol was thought to be a Type I reaction, because bithionol did not produce singlet oxygen and did not react to histidine. Acridine was regarded as a Type II substance, because of the evident effect of histidine as a scavenger. 8-Methoxypsoralen and 5-methoxypsoralen produced singlet oxygen, but their actions were not affected by the scavengers. In this study, we confirmed that reactive oxygen species have great effects in in vitro phototoxicity, and that the 3T3 NRU PT assay can be used to detect effects which are thought to be the direct reaction of an excited photosensitiser to biological substrates (Type III reaction), for example, 8-methoxypsoralen. Therefore, we suggest that photohaemolysis and phototoxicity could be used to evaluate the photodynamic mechanisms of photosensitising chemicals.
PapeW.J.W., BrandtM., & PfannenbeckerU. (1994). Combined in vitro assay for photohaemolysis and haemoglobin oxidation as part of a phototoxicity test system assessed with various phototoxic substances. Toxicology in Vitro8, 755–757.
4.
FreemanR.G., MurtishawW., & KnoxJ.M. (1970). Tissue culture techniques in the study of cell photobiology and phototoxicity. Journal of Investigative Dermatology54, 164–169.
5.
LockS.O., & FriendJ.V. (1986). Phototoxicity testing in vitro: evaluation of mammalian cell culture techniques. Food and Chemical Toxicology24, 789–793.
6.
LasarowR.M., IsseroffR.R., & GomezE. (1992). Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity by a fibroblast–neutral red assay. Journal of Investigative Dermatology98, 725–729.
7.
MaierK., Schmitt-LandgrafR., & SiegemundB. (1991). Development of an in vitro test system with human skin cells for evaluation of phototoxicity. Toxicology in Vitro5, 457–461.
8.
SpielmannH., BallsM., BrandM., DöringB., HolzhütterH-G., KalweitS., KlecakG., L'E-plattenierH., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., MoldenhauerF., MooreL., PapeW.J.W., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastD., De SilvaO., SteilingW., & WillshawA. (1994). EEC/COLIPA project on in vitro phototoxicity testing: first results obtained with the Balb/3T3 cell phototoxicity assay. Toxicology in Vitro8, 793–796.
9.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., PechovitchG., De SilvaO., HolzhütterH-G., ClothierR., DesolleP., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ.M., CsatoM., SladowskiD., SteilingW., & BrantomP. (1988). The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (Blind trial). Part 1: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity tests. Toxicology in Vitro12, 305–327.
10.
SpielmannG., Balls DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., De SilvaO., HolzhütterH-G., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., & PfannenbeckerU. (1988). A study on UV filter chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC in the in vitro 3T3 phototoxicity test. ATLA26, 679–708.
11.
DanielsF.J. (1965). A simple microbiological method for demonstrating phototoxic compounds. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology44, 259–263.
12.
SugiyamaM., ItagakiH., & KatoS. (1994). Photohaemolysis test and yeast growth inhibition assay to assess phototoxic potential of chemicals. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology — Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA, GoldbergA.M., & MaibackH.), pp. 213–221. New York, USA: Mary Ann Leibert.
13.
LovellW.W., & SandersD.J. (1990). Screening test for phototoxins using solutions of simple bio-chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro4, 318–320.
14.
EdwardsS.M., DonnellyT.A., SayraR.M., & RheinsL.A. (1994). Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity using a human skin model, Skin2™. Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine10, 111–117.
15.
AugustinC., CollombelC., & DamourO. (1997). Use of dermal equivalent and skin equivalent models for identifying phototoxic compounds. Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine13, 27–36.
16.
SpielmannH., LovellW.W., HölzleE., JohnsonB.E., MaurerT., MirandaM.A., PapeW.J.W., SaporaO., & SladowskiD. (1994). In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2. ATLA22, 314–348.
17.
MoysanA., MirandaM.A., MorlièreP., Penzo-MazzarinoL., AverbeckD., AverbeckS., Clement-LacroixP., MichelL., BazinM., GezeM., SantusR., JeanmouginM., CastellJ.W., & DubertretL. (1994). Evaluation of phototoxicity: from in vitro to in vivo. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicololgy — Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.), pp. 185–194. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
18.
LaustriatG. (1986). Molecular mechanism of photosensitization. Biochemie68, 771–778.
19.
FooteC.S. (1991). Definition of Type I and Type II photosensitized oxidation. Photochemistry and Photobiology54, 659.
20.
FooteC.S. (1976). Photosensitized oxidation and singlet oxygen: consequences in biological systems In Free Radicals in Biology (ed. PryorW.A.), pp. 95–133. New York, USA: Academic Press.
21.
RanadiveN.S., & MenonI.A. (1993). Reactive oxidants in photosensitized skin inflammations. In Clinical Dermatology, Vol. 8, Oxidative Stress in Dermatology (ed. FuchsJ., & PackerL.), pp. 141–168. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker.
22.
OkamotoY., RyuA., & OhkoshiK. (1999). In vitro alternatives and phototoxicity testing. I. Evaluation of in vitro phototoxicity assays. ATLA27, 639–664.
23.
SugiyamaM., ItagakiH., HayashiT., MurakamiN., & KatoS. (1994). In vitro assay to predict phototoxicity of chemicals. I. Red blood cell haemolysis assays. Alternatives to Animal Testing and Experimentation2, 183–191.
24.
TraynorN.J., JohnsonB.E., & GibbsN.K. (1996). Photohaemolysis assay for drugs phototoxicity complicated by ‘bleaching’ of released haemoglobin. Toxicology in Vitro10, 619–624.
25.
ArakaneK., RyuA., HayashiT., MasunagaT., ShinmotoK., MashikoS., NaganoT., & HirobeM. (1996). Singlet oxygen (1Δg) generation from coproporphyrin in propionibacterium acnes on irradiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications223, 578–582.
26.
DoleidenF.H., FahrenholtzS.R., LamolaA.A., & TrozzoloA.M. (1974). Reactivity of cholesterol and some fatty acids toward singlet oxygen. Photochemistry and Photobiology20, 519–521.
27.
SuwaK., KimuraT., & ShaapA.P. (1978). Reaction of singlet oxygen with cholesterol in liposomal membranes: effects of membrane fluidity on the photooxidation of cholesterol. Photochemistry and Photobiology28, 469–473.
28.
KraljicI. (1986). Detection of singlet oxygen and its role in dye photosensitized photooxidation on aqueous. Biochimie68, 807–811.
29.
CostanzoL.L., De GuidiG., CondorelloG., CambriaA., & FamaM. (1989). Molecular mechanism of drug photosensitization. II. Photo-haemolysis sensitized by ketoprofen. Photochemistry and Photobiology50, 359–365.
30.
KimuraS. (1991). Food related photo-dermatitis especially the mechanism of photo-dermatitis induced by pheophorbide. Skin Research33, 8–17.
31.
MirandaM., BoscaF., VargasF., & CanudasN. (1994). Photosensitization by fenofibrate. II. In vitro phototoxicity of the major metabolites. Photochemistry and Photobiology59, 171–174.
32.
SongP.S., & TapleyK.J. (1979). Photochemistry and photobiology of psoralens. Photochemistry and Photobiology29, 1177–1197.
33.
KittlerL., & LöberG. (1988). Photoreactions of furocoumarins with nucleic acids, proteins, membranes and their subunits. Studia Biophysica124, 97–114.
34.
AverbeckD. (1989). Recent advances in psoralen phototoxicity mechanism. Photochemistry and Photobiology50, 859–882.
35.
LaskinJ.D. (1994). Cellular and molecular mechanisms in photochemical sensitization: studies on the mechanism of action psoralens. Food and Chemical Toxicology32, 119–127.
36.
PapeW., PfannenbeckerU., & DiembeckW. (1994). A strategic approach for in vitro phototoxicity testing. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology — Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA, GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.), pp. 203–212. New York, USA: Mary Ann Leibert.
37.
KochevarI.E. (1981). Phototoxicity mechanisms: chlorpromazine photosensitized damage to DNA cell membranes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology76, 59–64.
