From subsistence to resistance: Asylum-seekers and the other ‘Occupy’ in Hong Kong

Abstract

In 2014, the Refugee Union – the only asylum-seeker-led organisation in Hong Kong – organised an eight-month-long protest against assistance policies and practices which they argued dehumanised and jeopardised their dignity and survival. Central to this public protest, termed ‘Refugee Occupy’, was the transformation of a traditional mechanism for asylum-seeker containment – the refugee camp – into a vehicle for asylum-seeker voice, participation and resistance. In this article, we discuss the asylum-seeker assistance policies and practices over the last decade that have resulted in a borderless refugee camp in Hong Kong. We explore the asylum-seekers’ use of the camp concept and its spatial and political transformation into an instrument for asylum-seeker resistance and political engagement. We conclude by situating the Refugee Union’s formation alongside other migrant-led social movements in Hong Kong and globally.

Keywords

assistance asylum-seeker refugee social movement welfare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas

(2014) ‘Bordered Penality: Precarious Membership and Abnormal Justice’, Punishment & Society 16(5): 520–541.

Agamben

(1995) Homo Sacer: Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Torino: Einaudi.

Agier

(2011) Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Governments. London: Polity Press.

Bailey

(2009) ‘Up against the Wall: Bare Life and Resistance in Australian Immigration Detention’, Law Critique 20: 113–132.

Barber

(2011) ‘What Democracy Looks Like’, Contexts 11(2): 14–16.

Bloch

Schuster

(2002) ‘Asylum and Welfare: Contemporary Debates’, Critical Social Policy 22(3): 393–414.

Burns

Christie

(2006) ‘Editorial: Community and Social Services Responses to Asylum Seekers’, Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 7(2): 6–17.

Byrne

(ed.) (2012) The Occupy Handbook. Hachette: Back Bay Books.

Carvalho

(2016) ‘Canada’s Government Urged to Take in Hong Kong Asylum Seekers Who Sheltered Edward Snowden’, South China Morning Post, 16 December [http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-crime/article/2053560/canadas-government-urged-take-hong-kong-asylum-seekers-who].

10.

Choi

(2014) ‘Protesting Asylum Seekers Say Food Provisions “Not Worth” What Government Contractor Claims’, South China Morning Post, 12 February [http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1426463/protest-asylum-seekers-food-provisions-not-worth-ISS-HK].

11.

Choi

Lee

(2014) ‘Tell Us What Our Food Really Costs’, South China Morning Post, 15 February [http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1428015/tell-us-what-our-food-really-costs].

12.

Christie

(2006) ‘From Racial to Racist State: Questions for Social Professionals Working with Asylum Seekers’, Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 7(2): 35–51.

13.

Clements

Shoffner

Zamore

(2016) ‘Uganda’s Approach to Refugee Self-reliance’, Forced Migration Review 52: 49–51.

14.

Conlon

(2011) ‘Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility’, Gender, Place & Culture 18(3): 353–360.

15.

Constable

(2009) ‘Migrant Workers and the Many States of Protest in Hong Kong’, Critical Asian Studies 41(1): 143–164.

16.

Darling

(2016) ‘Forced Migration and the City: Irregularity, Informality, and the Politics of Presence’, Progress in Human Geography, doi: 10.1177/0309132516629004.

17.

Easton-Calabria

(2016) ‘Refugee-run Organisations as Partners in Development’, Forced Migration Review 52: 72–74.

18.

Fassin

d’Halluin

(2007) ‘Critical Evidence: The Politics of Trauma in French Asylum Policies’, Ethos 35(3): 300–329.

19.

Fung

(2015) ‘Crime Wave Shows Folly of Open-door Policy to Refugees’, China Daily, 7 October [http://www.chinadailyasia.com/opinion/2015-10/07/content_15325622.html].

20.

Guentner

Lukes

Stanton

Vollmer

Wilding

(2016) ‘Bordering Practices in the UK Welfare System’, Critical Social Policy 36(3): 391–411.

21.

Guinea-Martin

(2014) ‘Compassionate and Egalitarian: The Charity Paradox in Two Voluntary Associations’, Ethnography 15(4): 540–563.

22.

Hathaway

(2008) ‘The Human Rights Quagmire of “Human Trafficking”’, Virginia Journal of International Law 49(1): 1–59.

23.

Hewitt

(2014) ‘Hong Kong’s Student Protesters Want Democracy – At Any Cost’, Newsweek, 30 September [http://www.newsweek.com/2014/10/10/hong-kongs-student-protesters-want-democracy-any-cost-274310.html].

24.

Hong Kong Court of First Instance (2014) Akhter Rana Shahid v Immigration Department, Police Department, Social Welfare Department, Legal Aid Department, and International Social Service, HCMP 3094/2013.

25.

Hsia

(2009) ‘The Making of a Transnational Grassroots Migrant Movement’, Critical Asian Studies 41(1): 113–141.

26.

Hyndman

Giles

(2011) ‘Waiting for What? The Feminization of Asylum in Protracted Situations’, Gender, Place & Culture 18(3): 361–379.

27.

Immigration Department (2015) ‘Panel on Security: Follow-up to Meeting on 7 July 2015’ [letter], 24 August [http://www.vfnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ImmD-reply-to-Legco-24Aug2015.pdf].

28.

Immigration Department (2017) ‘Enforcement’, Hong Kong [http://www.immd.gov.hk/eng/facts/enforcement.html].

29.

International Social Service (ISS) (2013) ‘酷刑聲請者衝擊本社太子辦事處’ [Torture claimants stormed ISS Prince Edward Office], Statement by International Social Service – Hong Kong Branch.

30.

Johansen

(2013) ‘Governing the Funnel of Expulsion: Agamben, the Dynamics of Force, and Minimalist Biopolitics’, pp. 257–272 in Aas

Bosworth

(eds) The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Joppke

(1998) ‘Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration’, World Politics 50(2): 266–293.

32.

Jørgensen

Thomsen

(2016) ‘Deservingness in the Danish Context: Welfare Chauvinism in Times of Crisis’, Critical Social Policy 36(3): 330–351.

33.

Kakuma News Reflector (2012) ‘KANERE: A Refugee-run Free Press in Kenya’, Forced Migration Review 40: 37–38.

34.

Kao

(2014) ‘Asylum Seekers Protest as Rights Group Sued for Defamation’, South China Morning Post, 21 April [http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1492044/asylum-seekers-protest-rights-group-sued-defamation].

35.

Keskinen

(2016) ‘From Welfare Nationalism to Welfare Chauvinism: Economic Rhetoric, the Welfare State and Changing Asylum Policies in Finland’, Critical Social Policy 36(3): 352–370.

36.

Khosravi

(2009) ‘Sweden: Detention and Deportation of Asylum Seekers’, Race & Class 50(4): 38–56.

37.

Khosravi

(2010) ‘Illegal’ Traveller: An Auto-Ethnography of Borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

38.

Lai

(2010) ‘Dancing to Different Tunes: Performance and Activism among Migrant Domestic Workers in Hong Kong’, Women’s Studies International Forum 33(5): 501–511.

39.

Langman

(2013) ‘Occupy: A New Social Movement’, Current Sociology 61(4): 510–524.

40.

Lashaw

(2012) ‘How Progressive Culture Resists Critique: The Impasse of NGO Studies’, Ethnography 14(4): 501–522.

41.

Legislative Council (2013) ‘Panel on Security of the Legislative Council: Screening of Non-refoulement Claims’, LC Paper No. CB(2)1465/12-13(01), 2 July, Hong Kong [http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr12-13/english/panels/se/papers/se0702cb2-1465-1-e.pdf].

42.

Leung

(2014) ‘The Fragmentation, Shift and Adaptation of the “Asylum Seeker” Identity in Hong Kong’, VF Research Insight Series 2, January [http://www.vfnow.org/wp-content/themes/foundationpress-child/images/resources/vf-research/VFR_Insight_Series_02.pdf].

43.

Malkki

(1995) ‘Refugees and Exile: From “Refugee Studies” to the Natural Order of Things’, Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 495–523.

44.

Manocchi

(2012) Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati Politici: Percorsi di Ricostruzione Identitaria: Il caso Torinese. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

45.

Mountz

(2011) ‘Where Asylum-seekers Wait: Feminist Counter-topographies of Sites between States’, Gender, Place & Culture 18(3): 381–399.

46.

Now TV (2014) Now TV on the refugee clash at ISS Hong Kong [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdwlRjhmgi8].

47.

Ramadan

(2013) ‘Spatialising the Refugee Camp’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(1): 65–77.

48.

Ramsden

Marsh

(2013) ‘The “Right to Work” of Refugees in Hong Kong: Ma v Director of Immigration’, International Journal of Refugee Law 25(3): 574–596.

49.

Refugee Union (2014) ‘Refugee Union Demands Display of ISS Food Prices’ [open letter and petition], Vision First Blog, 11 February [http://www.vfnow.org/4937/refugee-union-demands-display-of-iss-food-prices/].

50.

RISE: Refugees Survivors Ex-Detainees (2014/2015) ‘Nothing About Us Without Us! RISE Annual Report 2014/2015’. RISE, Australia.

51.

Robinson

Segrott

(2002) ‘Understanding the Decision-making of Asylum Seekers’, Research Study 243. Home Office, UK [http://www.ners-sunderland.org.uk/content/hors243.pdf].

52.

Sales

(2002) ‘The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain’, Critical Social Policy 22(3): 456–478.

53.

Sciurba

(2009) Campi di Forza: Percorsi Confinati di Migranti in Europa. Verona: Ombre Corte.

54.

Sim

(2009) ‘Women versus the State: Organizing Resistance and Contesting Exploitation in Indonesian Labor Migration to Hong Kong’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 18(1): 47–75.

55.

Singona

(2014) ‘Campzenship: Reimagining the Camp as a Social and Political Space’, Citizenship Studies 19(1): 1–15.

56.

Social Welfare Department (2014) ‘Questions Received for Briefing on Invitation to Tender for “Provision of Assistance for Non-refoulement Claimants”’, December [http://www.swd.gov.hk/doc/whatsnew/201412/Questions-and-Answers.pdf].

57.

Solomon

(2014) ‘Hong Kong: Refugees Fighting an Unfair System’, Socialist 3: 6–8.

58.

Squire

(2009) The Exclusionary Politics of Asylum. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

59.

Ticktin

(2011) Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley: University of California Press.

60.

United Nations (2014) Statistical Yearbook 2014. Geneva: UNHCR. [http://www.unhcr.org/56655f4d8.html]

61.

United Nations (2016a) United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Geneva [http://www.unhcr.org/1951-refugee-convention.html].

62.

United Nations (2016b) Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Geneva [http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx].

63.

Vecchio

(2015) Asylum Seeking and the Global City. Abingdon: Routledge.

64.

Vision First (2015a) ‘VF Report: Criminal Intimidation and Arson in a Refugee Slum’, Vision First Blog, 12 January [http://www.vfnow.org/6372/vf-report-criminal-intimidation-arson-refugee-slum/], accessed 1 August 2016.

65.

Vision First (2015b) ‘Transcript of Cable TV Report on Shrunken Food Supplies’, Vision First Blog, 11 March [http://www.vfnow.org/7519/transcript-cable-tv-report-shrunken-food-supplies/].

66.

Webber

(2004) ‘The War on Migration’, in Hillyard

Pantazis

Tombs

Gordon

(eds) Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

67.

Weber

(2006) ‘The Shifting Frontiers of Migration Control’, in Pickering

Weber

(eds) Borders, Mobility and Technologies of Control. Dordrecht: Springer.

68.

Weber

Pickering

(2011) Globalization and Borders: Death at the Global Frontier. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

69.

Zetter

(2007) ‘More Labels, Fewer Refugees: Remaking the Refugee Label in an Era of Globalization’, Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2): 172–192.