In 2014, the Refugee Union – the only asylum-seeker-led organisation in Hong Kong – organised an eight-month-long protest against assistance policies and practices which they argued dehumanised and jeopardised their dignity and survival. Central to this public protest, termed ‘Refugee Occupy’, was the transformation of a traditional mechanism for asylum-seeker containment – the refugee camp – into a vehicle for asylum-seeker voice, participation and resistance. In this article, we discuss the asylum-seeker assistance policies and practices over the last decade that have resulted in a borderless refugee camp in Hong Kong. We explore the asylum-seekers’ use of the camp concept and its spatial and political transformation into an instrument for asylum-seeker resistance and political engagement. We conclude by situating the Refugee Union’s formation alongside other migrant-led social movements in Hong Kong and globally.
ChristieA (2006) ‘From Racial to Racist State: Questions for Social Professionals Working with Asylum Seekers’, Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies7(2): 35–51.
ConlonD (2011) ‘Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility’, Gender, Place & Culture18(3): 353–360.
15.
ConstableN (2009) ‘Migrant Workers and the Many States of Protest in Hong Kong’, Critical Asian Studies41(1): 143–164.
16.
DarlingJ (2016) ‘Forced Migration and the City: Irregularity, Informality, and the Politics of Presence’, Progress in Human Geography, doi: 10.1177/0309132516629004.
17.
Easton-CalabriaE (2016) ‘Refugee-run Organisations as Partners in Development’, Forced Migration Review52: 72–74.
18.
FassinDd’HalluinE (2007) ‘Critical Evidence: The Politics of Trauma in French Asylum Policies’, Ethos35(3): 300–329.
Hong Kong Court of First Instance (2014) Akhter Rana Shahid v Immigration Department, Police Department, Social Welfare Department, Legal Aid Department, and International Social Service, HCMP 3094/2013.
25.
HsiaHC (2009) ‘The Making of a Transnational Grassroots Migrant Movement’, Critical Asian Studies41(1): 113–141.
26.
HyndmanJGilesW (2011) ‘Waiting for What? The Feminization of Asylum in Protracted Situations’, Gender, Place & Culture18(3): 361–379.
International Social Service (ISS) (2013) ‘酷刑聲請者衝擊本社太子辦事處’ [Torture claimants stormed ISS Prince Edward Office], Statement by International Social Service – Hong Kong Branch.
30.
JohansenNB (2013) ‘Governing the Funnel of Expulsion: Agamben, the Dynamics of Force, and Minimalist Biopolitics’, pp. 257–272 in AasKFBosworthM (eds) The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
JoppkeC (1998) ‘Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration’, World Politics50(2): 266–293.
32.
JørgensenMBThomsenTL (2016) ‘Deservingness in the Danish Context: Welfare Chauvinism in Times of Crisis’, Critical Social Policy36(3): 330–351.
33.
Kakuma News Reflector (2012) ‘KANERE: A Refugee-run Free Press in Kenya’, Forced Migration Review40: 37–38.
KeskinenS (2016) ‘From Welfare Nationalism to Welfare Chauvinism: Economic Rhetoric, the Welfare State and Changing Asylum Policies in Finland’, Critical Social Policy36(3): 352–370.
36.
KhosraviS (2009) ‘Sweden: Detention and Deportation of Asylum Seekers’, Race & Class50(4): 38–56.
37.
KhosraviS (2010) ‘Illegal’ Traveller: An Auto-Ethnography of Borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
LaiMY (2010) ‘Dancing to Different Tunes: Performance and Activism among Migrant Domestic Workers in Hong Kong’, Women’s Studies International Forum33(5): 501–511.
39.
LangmanL (2013) ‘Occupy: A New Social Movement’, Current Sociology61(4): 510–524.
40.
LashawA (2012) ‘How Progressive Culture Resists Critique: The Impasse of NGO Studies’, Ethnography14(4): 501–522.
RamadanA (2013) ‘Spatialising the Refugee Camp’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(1): 65–77.
48.
RamsdenMMarshL (2013) ‘The “Right to Work” of Refugees in Hong Kong: Ma v Director of Immigration’, International Journal of Refugee Law25(3): 574–596.
SalesR (2002) ‘The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain’, Critical Social Policy22(3): 456–478.
53.
SciurbaA (2009) Campi di Forza: Percorsi Confinati di Migranti in Europa. Verona: Ombre Corte.
54.
SimA (2009) ‘Women versus the State: Organizing Resistance and Contesting Exploitation in Indonesian Labor Migration to Hong Kong’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal18(1): 47–75.
55.
SingonaN (2014) ‘Campzenship: Reimagining the Camp as a Social and Political Space’, Citizenship Studies19(1): 1–15.
WebberF (2004) ‘The War on Migration’, in HillyardPPantazisCTombsSGordonD (eds) Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.
67.
WeberL (2006) ‘The Shifting Frontiers of Migration Control’, in PickeringSWeberL (eds) Borders, Mobility and Technologies of Control. Dordrecht: Springer.
68.
WeberLPickeringS (2011) Globalization and Borders: Death at the Global Frontier. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.
ZetterR (2007) ‘More Labels, Fewer Refugees: Remaking the Refugee Label in an Era of Globalization’, Journal of Refugee Studies20(2): 172–192.
