This qualitative research study explores prisoner and rehabilitation staff perspectives (N=26) on the phenomenon of ‘change’ as a mode of enforced performance in a work release programme in Illinois. Research questions were developed on the basis of a prolonged encounter with re-entering ex-offenders during a project that combined theatre and research. Bringing together two distinct disciplines – Performance Studies and Critical Social Policy – we explore the extent to which re-entering prisoners and rehabilitation staff conceive of their work release programme as enforcing a performance of change into a rehabilitated self. Our results show that all participants feel that the programme enforces such a performance. However, some saw this performance as truly transformative, while others considered it politically oppressive and instrumental. Language performance in particular was considered a strictly imposed demand on prisoners, mostly black, who were advised not to use Ebonics outside of the facility. Implications for policy are outlined.
AdamBD (1978) The Survival of Domination: Inferiorization and Everyday Life. New York: Elsevier.
2.
AlexanderBK (2004) ‘Passing, Cultural Performance, and Individual Agency: Performative Reflections on Black Masculine Identity’, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies4(3): 377–404.
3.
AlexanderM (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
4.
AlexanderM (2011) ‘New Jim Crow’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law9: 7–26.
5.
AustinJL (1975) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BaileyB (2000) ‘The Language of Multiple Identities among Dominican Americans’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology10: 190–223.
7.
BandyopadhyayM (2006) ‘Competing Masculinities in a Prison’, Men and Masculinities9(2): 186–203.
8.
BarakASpielbergerJGitlowE (2014) ‘The Challenge of Relationships and Fidelity: Home Visitors’ Perspectives’, Children and Youth Services Review42: 50–58.
ButlerJ (1988) ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory’, Theatre Journal40: 519–531.
15.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Gender. New York: Routledge.
16.
ButlerJ (1999) ‘Bodily Inscriptions, Performative Subversions’, pp. 416–422 in PriceJShildrickM (eds) Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader. New York: Routledge.
CoatesT-N (2015) Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
19.
CornelissenJPHaslamSABalmerJM (2007) ‘Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products’, British Journal of Management18(s1): S1–S16.
DavisA (1998) ‘Masked Racism: Reflections on the Prison Industrial Complex’, Color Lines1(2): 11–13.
22.
DavisAShaylorC (2001) ‘Race, Gender, and the Prison Industrial Complex: California and Beyond’, Meridians2(1): 1–25.
23.
FoucaultM (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
24.
GinsbergE (1996) ‘The Politics of Passing’, pp. 1–18 in GinsbergE (ed.) Passing and the Fictions of Identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
GlaserBGStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre. Garden City, New York.
27.
GoffmanE (1968) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
28.
HartmanA (2010) ‘Language as Oppression: The English-only Movement in the United States’, Socialism and Democracy17(1): 187–208.
29.
HetheringtonK (1998) Expressions of Identity: Space, Performance, Politics. London: SAGE.
30.
JamesN (2015) ‘Offender Reentry: Correctional Statistics, Reintegration into the Community, and Recidivism’, Congressional Research Service [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34287.pdf], accessed 10 April 2016.
31.
KomiteeS (2006) ‘A Student’s Guide to Performance Studies’. Harvard University iSites.
32.
LacanJ (1977) Ecrits: A Selection. New York: Norton.
33.
LeonardoZ (2004) ‘The Color of Supremacy: Beyond the Discourse of “White Privilege”’, Educational Philosophy and Theory36(2): 137–152.
34.
McCorkelJA (2003) ‘Embodied Surveillance and the Gendering of Punishment’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32(1): 41–76.
35.
MaysNPopeC (1995) ‘Qualitative Research: Rigour and Qualitative Research’, BMJ311(6997): 109–112.
36.
MitfordJ (1974) Kind and Usual Punishment: The Prison Business. New York: Vintage.
37.
MorseJM (1995) ‘The Significance of Saturation’, Qualitative Health Research5(2): 147–149.
38.
OgbuJU (2004) ‘Collective Identity and the Burden of “Acting White” in Black History, Community, and Education’, The Urban Review36(1): 1–35.
39.
OpsalTFoleyA (2013) ‘Making it on the Outside: Understanding Barriers to Women’s Post-Incarceration Reintegration’, Sociology Compass7(4): 265–277.
40.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
PrattTC (2008) Addicted to Incarceration: Corrections Policy and the Politics of Misinformation in the United States. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
42.
PrilleltenskyIGonickL (1996) ‘Politics Change, Oppression Remains: On the Psychology and Politics of Oppression’, Political Psychology17(1): 127–148.
43.
RameyHLRose-KrasnorL (2015) ‘The New Mentality: Youth-Adult Partnerships in Community Mental Health Promotion’, Children and Youth Services Review50: 28–37.
44.
ReisigMDBalesWDHayCWangX (2007) ‘The Effect of Racial Inequality on Black Male Recidivism’, Justice Quarterly24(3): 408–434.
45.
RichardsSCRossJINewboldGLenzaMJonesRSMurphyDSGrigsbyRS (2011) ‘Prisoner Re-entry Policy Recommendations’, pp. 198–222 in EkunweIOJonesRS (eds) Global Perspectives on Re-entry. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere Press.
46.
SandelowskiM (1995) ‘Focus on Qualitative Methods: Sample Size in Qualitative Research’, Research in Nursing and Health18: 179–183.
47.
SchechnerR (2008) ‘What is Performance Studies?’, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities5: 2–11.
48.
SchechnerR (2013) Performance Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
49.
SchmidTJJonesRS (1991) ‘Suspended Identity: Identity Transformation in a Maximum Security Prison’, Symbolic Interaction14(4): 415–432.
50.
SeiterRPKadelaKR (2003) ‘Prisoner Reentry: What Works, What Does Not, and What is Promising’, Crime & Delinquency49(3): 360–388.
51.
SimonsonJ (2006) ‘Rethinking Rational Discrimination against Ex-offenders’, Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy13(2): 283–311.
52.
SmithEHatteryAJ (2010) ‘African American Men and the Prison Industrial Complex’, Western Journal of Black Studies34(4): 387–398.
53.
StaffordC (2006) ‘Finding Work: How to Approach the Intersection of Prisoner Reentry, Employment, and Recidivism’, Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy13: 261–265.
54.
StraussALCorbinJM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
55.
UrciuoliB (2013) Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race, and Class. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press.
56.
VargheseFP (2013) ‘Vocational Interventions with Offenders: Interdisciplinary Research, Theory, and Integration’, The Counseling Psychologist41(7): 1011–1039.
57.
WillieSS (2003) Acting Black: College, Identity, and the Performance of Race. New York: Psychology Press.
