The discursive rhetoric of responsibility has become associated with a neo-liberal ‘responsibilisation’ agenda, typified by policy approaches to rough sleeping in England. I draw on feminist ethics of care literature to provide a critical discussion of responsibility. Informed by original ethnographic research I explore how responsibility is practised and negotiated between rough sleepers and local actors through on-site food provisioning activities in the city of Newcastle in northeast England. A distinction and tension was identified between voluntary organisations’ ‘taking care of’ rough sleepers’ food needs, and commissioned service providers and rough sleepers who articulated a ‘caring with’ approach; both practices highlighted a complex interplay between care and responsibilisation framings. The research revealed how these discourses interacted to inform the implementation and responsiveness of local voluntary and policy actors, to the extent that responsibilisation was made possible by the purposeful rendering of collective and situated care practices.
BarnesM (2012) Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
2.
BarnesMPriorD (2009) ‘Examining the Idea of “Subversion” in Public Services’, pp. 3–13 in BarnesMPriorD (eds) Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.
3.
BuckinghamH (2012) ‘Capturing Diversity: A Typology of Third Sector Organisations’ Responses to Contracting Based on Empirical Evidence from Homelessness Services’, Journal of Social Policy41(3): 569–589.
4.
ClokePMayJJohnsenS (2010) Swept Up Lives: Re-envisioning the Homeless City. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
CoxR (2013) ‘Gendered Spaces of Commoditised Care’, Social & Cultural Geography14(5): 491–499.
6.
Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2011) Vision to End Rough Sleeping: No Second Night Out Nationwide. London: DCLG.
7.
Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2012) Making Every Contact Count: A Joint Approach to Preventing Homelessness. London: DCLG.
8.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions/Rough Sleepers Unit (DETR/RSU) (1999) Coming in from the Cold: The Government’s Strategy on Rough Sleeping. London: DETR.
9.
Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) (2003) More than a Roof: A Report into Tackling Homelessness. London: DTLR.
10.
DeVerteuilG (2014) ‘Does the Punitive Need the Supportive? A Sympathetic Critique of Current Grammars of Urban Injustice’, Antipode46(4): 874–893.
11.
DobsonR (2011) ‘Conditionality and Homelessness Services: “Practice Realities” in a Drop-in Centre’, Social Policy and Society10(4): 547–557.
12.
DwyerPBowpittGSundinEWeinsteinM (2015) ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Refusals: Homelessness Policy and the Exclusion of Single Homeless People with Complex Needs’, Critical Social Policy35(1): 3–23.
13.
EngsterD (2007) The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
FitzpatrickSJonesA (2005) ‘Pursuing Social Justice or Social Cohesion? Coercion in Street Homelessness Policies in England’, Journal of Social Policy34(3): 389–406.
15.
FitzpatrickSPleaceN (2012) ‘The Statutory Homelessness System in England: A Fair and Effective Rights-based Model?’, Housing Studies27(2): 232–251.
16.
FitzpatrickSStephensM (2014) ‘Welfare Regimes, Social Values and Homelessness: Comparing Responses to Marginalised Groups in Six European Countries’, Housing Studies29(2): 215–234.
17.
HancockLMooneyGNealS (2012) ‘Crisis Social Policy and the Resilience of the Concept of Community’, Critical Social Policy32(3): 343–364.
18.
Homeless Link (2012) Adopting the No Second Night Out Standard: Developing a Service Offer for those New to the Streets. London: Homeless Link.
19.
JohnsenSClokePMayJ (2005a) ‘Transitory Spaces of Care: Serving Homeless People on the Street’, Health and Place11(4): 323–336.
20.
JohnsenSClokePMayJ (2005b) ‘Day Centres for Homeless People: Spaces of Care or Fear?’, Social & Cultural Geography6(6): 787–811.
21.
KatzC (2004) Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
LaneLPowerA (2009) Soup Runs in Central London: ‘The Right Help in the Right Place at the Right Time?’London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science.
23.
LawsonV (2007) ‘Geographies of Care and Responsibility’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers97(1): 1–11.
24.
LiebenbergLUngarMIkedaJ (2015) ‘Neo-Liberalism and Responsibilisation in the Discourse of Social Service Workers’, British Journal of Social Work45(3): 1006–1021.
25.
ListerR (1990) The Exclusive Society: Citizenship and the Poor. London: CPAG.
26.
MayJClokeP (2014) ‘Modes of Attentiveness: Reading for Difference in Geographies of Homelessness’, Antipode46(4): 894–920.
27.
MayJClokePJohnsenS (2005) ‘Re-phasing Neoliberalism: New Labour and Britain’s Crisis of Street Homelessness’, Antipode37(4): 703–730.
28.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edition. London: SAGE.
29.
MolAMoserIPolsJ (2010) ‘Care: Putting Practice into Theory’, pp. 7–25 in MolAMoserIPolsJ (eds) Care in Practice: Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript.
30.
Newcastle City Council (2012) ‘Where to Eat for Free’. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle City Council.
31.
Newcastle City Council (2013) Newcastle’s Draft Homelessness Review 2013. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle City Council.
32.
ParsellCParsellM (2012) ‘Homelessness as a Choice’, Housing, Theory and Society29(4): 420–434.
33.
PawsonH (2007) ‘Local Authority Homelessness Prevention in England: Empowering Consumers or Denying Rights?’, Housing Studies22(6): 867–883.
PhelanENorrisM (2008) ‘Neo-corporatist Governance of Homeless Services in Dublin: Reconceptualization, Incorporation and Exclusion’, Critical Social Policy28(1): 51–73.
36.
PinkS (2012) Situating Everyday Life. London: SAGE.
37.
PleaceN (1998) ‘Single Homelessness and Social Exclusion: The Unique and the Extreme’, Social Policy & Administration32(1): 46–59.
38.
RoseN (1996) ‘The Death of the Social? Re-figuring the Territory of Government’, Economy and Society25(3): 327–356.
39.
ScanlonCAdlamA (2008) ‘Refusal, Social Exclusion and the Cycle of Rejection: A Cynical Analysis?’, Critical Social Policy28(4): 529–549.
40.
SevenhuijsenS (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care. London: Routledge.
41.
SevenhuijsenS (2000) ‘Caring in the Third Way: The Relation between Obligation, Responsibility and Care in Third Way Discourse’, Critical Social Policy20(1): 5–37.
42.
SevenhuijsenS (2003) ‘The Place of Care: The Relevance of the Feminist Ethics of Care for Social Policy’, Feminist Theory4(2): 179–197.
43.
Social Exclusion Unit (1998) Rough Sleeping. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
44.
StaeheliLA (2013) ‘Whose Responsibility Is It? Obligation, Citizenship and Social Welfare’, Antipode45(3): 521–540.
45.
StaeheliLABrownM (2003) ‘Where Has Welfare Gone? Introductory Remarks on the Geographies of Care and Welfare’, Environment & Planning A35(5): 771–777.
46.
TrontoJC ([1993] 2009) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Abingdon: Routledge.
47.
TrontoJC (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
48.
WalkerMU (2007) Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
WarnerJTalbotDBennisonG (2013) ‘The Café as Affective Community Space: Reconceptualising Care and Emotional Labour in Everyday Life’, Critical Social Policy33(2): 305–324.
50.
WhitefordM (2010) ‘Hot Tea, Dry Toast and the Responsibilisation of Homeless People’, Social Policy and Society9(2): 193–205.
51.
WhitefordM (2013) ‘New Labour, Street Homelessness and Social Exclusion: A Defaulted Promissory Note’, Housing Studies28(1): 10–32.
52.
YoungIM (1997) ‘Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought’, Constellations3(3): 340–363.
