This article considers the motivations behind a 2007 reform in Sweden to implement a tax deduction on domestic services for households, and how the reform could be passed despite extensive political opposition to it. Critical framing analysis is used to argue that at least a partial explanation for the policy reform is to be found in the inherent limitations of the gender equality policy as hitherto pursued in the country, and in the way these limitations were framed in the political debates to push for the reform. The analysis draws upon public documents and records of parliamentary and media debates.
Allians för Sverige (2006) En Politik för Arbete och Trygghet. Stockholm: Allians för Sverige.
3.
AndersonB (2000) Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: Zed Books.
4.
BacchiC (1999) Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: SAGE.
5.
BacchiC (2012) ‘Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible’, Open Journal of Political Science2(1): 1–8.
6.
BélandD (2009) ‘Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change’, Journal of European Public Policy16(5): 701–718.
7.
CallemanC (2011) ‘Domestic Services in a “Land of Equality”: The Case of Sweden’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law23(1): 121–139.
8.
CoxRH (2001) ‘The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany’, World Politics53(3): 463–498.
9.
CromptonRLewisSLyonetteC (2007) Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Dagens Nyheter (2004a) ‘Lyckat Finskt Försök Trappar upp Pigdebatten Inför Nästa Val’, 26October.
11.
Dagens Nyheter (2004b) ‘Ministerdebutant i Blåsväder’, 31October.
12.
Dagens Nyheter (2005) ‘S Måste Ompröva Inställningen till Hushållsnära Tjänster’, 21October.
DuvanderAFerrariniTThalbergS (2006) ‘Swedish Parental Leave: Achievements and Reform Challenges’, pp. 217–238 in RossiG (ed.) Reconciling Family and Work: New Challenges for Social Policies in Europe. Milan: Franco Angelli.
15.
EhrenreichBHochschildAR (eds) (2003) Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
16.
Ernsjöö RappeTStrannegårdL (2004) Rent Hus. Slaget om den Svenska Dammråttan. Stockholm: Nordstedts.
17.
Expressen (2010a) ‘Alla Blir Förlorare om de Rödgröna Slopar Rut-avdraget’, 2March.
18.
Expressen (2010b) ‘Så Ska Moderaterna Utnyttja Rut-avdraget för att Vinna mot Sahlin’, 2March.
Lag om Skattereduktion för Utgifter för Hushållsarbete SFS 2007:346 (2007) Swedish Code of Statutes.
26.
LindbomA (2007) ‘Obfuscating Retrenchment: Swedish Welfare Policy in the 1990s’, Journal of Public Policy27(2): 129–150.
27.
LombardoERolandsen AugustínL (2012) ‘Framing Gender Intersections in the European Union: What Implications for the Quality of Intersectionality in Policies?’, Social Politics19(4): 482–512.
28.
LutzH (2011) The New Maids: Transnational Women and the Care Economy. London: Zed Books.
29.
McDowellL (2004) ‘Work, Workfare, Work/Life Balance and the Ethic of Care’, Progress in Human Geography28(2): 145–163.
30.
MorganK (2008) ‘The Political Path to a Dual Earner/Dual Carer Society: Pitfalls and Possibilities’, Politics & Society36(3): 403–420.
NybergA (2012) ‘Gender Equality Policy in Sweden: 1970s–2010s’, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies2(4): 67–84.
33.
ÖbergL (1999) ‘Ett Socialdemokratiskt Dilemma: Från Hembiträdesfråga till Pigdebatt’, pp. 159–199 in FlorinC (ed.) Kvinnor mot Kvinnor: Om Systerskapets Svårigheter. Stockholm: Norstedts.
34.
OscarssonHHolmbergS (2008) Regeringsskifte. Väljarna och Valet 2006. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
35.
PålssonAMNorrmanE (eds) (1994) Finns det en Marknad för Hemarbete?Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
36.
PascallGLewisJ (2004) ‘Emerging Gender Regimes and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe’, Journal of Social Policy33(3): 373–394.
37.
PlatzerE (2006) ‘From Public Responsibility and Back Again: The New Domestic Services in Sweden’, Gender & History18(2): 211–221.
38.
RayRGornickJCSchmittJ (2010) ‘Who Cares? Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality in Parental Leave Policy Designs in 21 Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy20(3): 196–216.
Swedish Government Official Reports (1994) Uppskattad Sysselsättning. Report No. SOU 1994:43. Stockholm: Fritzes.
49.
Swedish Government Official Reports (1997) Tjänstebeskattningsutredningen. Report No. SOU 1997:17. Stockholm: Fritzes.
50.
SzebehelyM (2005) ‘Care as Employment and Welfare Provision: Child Care and Elder Care in Sweden at the Dawn of the 21st Century’, pp. 80–99 in DahlHMRask EriksenT (eds) Dilemmas of Care in the Nordic Welfare State: Continuity and Change. Aldershot: Ashgate.
51.
TrontoJC (2002) ‘The Nanny Question in Feminism’, Hypatia17(2): 34–61.
52.
TrontoJC (2011) ‘A Feminist Democratic Ethics of Care and Global Care Workers: Citizenship and Responsibility’, pp. 162–177 in MahonRRobinsonF (eds) Feminist Ethics and Social Policy: Towards a New Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.