Consistent with Social Work Codes of Ethics and mainstream social policy objectives, the Disability Rights Movement (DRM) promotes the universal values of equal rights and individual autonomy, drawing heavily from Kantian philosophy. However, an anti-universalized Nietzschean perspective is also promoted via the ‘social model’ of disability, challenging the political orthodoxy of rights-based social movements, and the aspirations of social workers to ‘empower’ disabled people. I argue that these Kantian and Nietzschean strands within the DRM, whilst incommensurable, permit a radical assertion of disability-identity. That is, without conceding to value-relativism and postmodern particularlism, and allowing a ‘celebration of difference’ through establishing reciprocal social relations.
Appel, F. (1999) Nietzsche Contra Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press .
2.
Banks, S. (2001) Ethics and Values in Social Work. London: Palgrave .
3.
Barnes, C. (1991) Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. London: Hurst and Calgary .
4.
Barton, L. (ed.) (1996) Disability and Society. London: Longman .
5.
Blackburn, S. (1996) The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
6.
Connelly, O. (1998) ‘Pity, Tragedy and the Pathos of Distance’ , European Journal of Philosophy6(3): 277-296 .
7.
Copleston. F.S.J. (1994) A History of Philosophy: Vol. VII. New York: Image Books .
8.
Devigne, R. (1999) ‘Review of Appel: Nietzsche Contra Democracy’ , American Political Science Review93(3): 693-694 .
9.
Fitzpatrick, T. (1996) ‘Postmodernism, Welfare and Radical Politics’ , Journal of Social Policy25(3): 303-320 .
10.
Habermas, J. (1990) Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press .
11.
Hayek, F.A. (1993, first published in 1960) Law, Legislation and Liberty. London: Routledge .
12.
Hill, T.E. (2002) Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
13.
Hughes, G. and Lewis, G. (eds) (1998) Unsettling Welfare: The Reconstruction of Social Policy. London: Routledge .
14.
Hugman, R. and Smith, D. (1995) Ethical Issues in Social Work. London: Routledge .
15.
Kant, I. (1993, first published in 1785) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Hackett .
16.
Kant, I. (1997, first published in 1788) Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Kaufman, A. (1999) Welfare in the Kantian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
18.
Liachowitz, C.H. (1988) The Social Construction of Disability. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
19.
Louden, R.B. (2000) Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press .
20.
May, S. (1999) Nietzsche’s Ethics and His War on ‘Morality’. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
21.
Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice. London: Women’s Press .
22.
Nietzsche, F. (1956, first published in 1872 and 1887 respectively) The Birth of Tragedy and The Genealogy of Morals. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books .
23.
Nietzsche, F. (1968, first published in 1889 and 1885 respectively) Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ. London: Penguin .
24.
Nietzsche, F. (1975a, first published in 1887) Beyond Good and Evil. London: Penguin .
25.
Nietzsche, F. (1975b, first published in 1883) Thus Spoke Zarathustra. London: Penguin .
26.
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
27.
Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan .
28.
Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (1998) Disabled People and Social Exclusion: From Exclusion to Inclusion. London: Longman .
29.
Penna, S. and O’Brien, M. (1996) ‘Post-Modernism and Social Policy: a Small Step Forwards?’ , Journal of Social Policy25(1): 39-61 .
30.
Pippin, R.B. (1991) Modernism as a Philosophical Problem. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
31.
Raz, J. (1988) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
32.
Saraga, E. (ed.) (1998) Embodying the Social: Constructions of Difference. London: Routledge .
33.
Smith, S.R. (1997) ‘Disarming the Ideological Conflict between the Centre-Left and New Right: The Implementation of UK Social Security Policy’ , Journal of Political Ideologies2(1): 79-97 .
34.
Smith, S.R. (1998), The Centre-Left and New Right Divide?: Political Philosophy and Social Policy in the Era of the Welfare State. Aldershot: Ashgate .
35.
Smith, S.R. (2001) ‘The Social Construction of Talent: A Defence of Justice as Reciprocity’ , Journal of Political Philosophy9(1): 19-37 .
36.
Smith, S.R. (2002a) ‘Fraternal Learning and Interdependency: Celebrating Differences within Reciprocal Commitments’ , Policy and Politics30(1): 47-59 .
37.
Smith, S.R. (2002b) Defending Justice as Reciprocity: An Essay on Social Policy and Political Philosophy. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen .
38.
Solomon, R.C. (2001) The Existentialists and their Nineteenth Century Backgrounds. New York: Rowman and Littlefield .
39.
Swain, J. , French, S. and Cameron, C. (2003) Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Buckingham: Open University Press .
40.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1994) ‘Post-Modernism and Social Policy: the Great Leap Backwards?’ , Journal of Social Policy23(3): 385-464 .
41.
Van Der Linden, H. (1988) Kantian Ethics and Socialism. Cambridge: Hackett .
42.
West, D. (1996) An Introduction to Continental Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
