Social inclusion in the post-conflict state of Nepal: Donor practice and the political settlement

Abstract

Fragile states constitute a challenging operating environment. Yet, the role of development partner engagement on issues of social inclusion, identity politics, or horizontal inequalities in such fragile environments has not received the attention these complex issues warrant. The attitudes of development actors, their level of commitment, bias, risk management, and understanding of the political settlement can have a real bearing on the effectiveness of such efforts to promote inclusion. In Nepal, certain development partners have faced elite backlash for their engagement on social inclusion, while others have been more successful. This article asks what lessons can be learned from these experiences for those interested in promoting social inclusion in fragile states through development assistance.

Keywords

Donor practice fragile states political settlements social inclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adhikari

(2012) Revolution by other means: The transformation of Nepal’s Maoists in a time of peace. In: Von Einsiedel

Malone

Pradhan

(eds) Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–286.

Andrews

Pritchett

Woolcock

(2012) Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA). Working Paper 2010/64. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2014) Nepal information page. Available at: http://www.adb.org/publications/framework-inclusive-growth-indicators-2014-key-indicators-asia-and-pacific

Atkinson

(1998) Social exclusion, poverty, and unemployment. In: Atkinson

Hills

(eds) Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, pp. 1–20.

Bennett

(2008) Policy reform and culture change: Contesting gender, caste, and ethnic exclusion in Nepal. In: Dani

Haan

(eds) Inclusive States: Social Policy and Structural Inequalities. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 197–224.

Bennett

Sharma

(2006) Unequal Citizens: Gender, Caste and Ethnic Exclusion in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: DFID and World Bank.

Bennett

Sijapati

Thapa

(2012) Forging Equal Citizenship in a Multicultural Nepal (Unpublished). Kathmandu, Nepal.

Bista

(1991) Fatalism and Development: Nepal’s Struggle for Modernization. Kolkata, India: Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd.

Biswokarma

(2012) Pressure from ‘hill elites’ halts DFID exclusion report. Republica, 20 August. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal Republic Media Pvt. Ltd.

10.

Central Department of Sociology/Anthropology (CDSA) (2014) Poverty and Exclusion in Nepal: Further Analysis of Recent Surveys and Census. Kathmandu, Nepal: CDSA, Tribhuvan University.

11.

Cox

Orsborn

Sisk

(2015) Social Cohesion in Nepal’s Turbulent Transition. Denver, CO: Sié Chéou Kang Center for International Security and Diplomacy at the University of Denver.

12.

Department for International Development (DFID) (2011) DFID Nepal Operational Plan 2011-2015: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Annex. London: DFID.

13.

Dhungel

(2012) On the Shelf: Blaming caste groups for a donor report being shelved is unnecessary politicization of the issue. Kathmandu Post, 23 August. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kantipur Publications Pvt. Ltd.

14.

Di John

Putzel

(2009) Political Settlements: Issues Paper. Birmingham: GSDRC.

15.

Drucza

(2016) Building a socially inclusive state: Federalism in Nepal. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations: Annual Review. doi:10.18848/1447-9532/CGP

16.

Engel (2014) The not-so-great aid debate. Third World Quarterly 35(8): 1374–1389.

17.

Eyben

(2005) Donors, rights-based approaches and implications for global citizenship: A case study from Peru. In: Kabeer

(ed.) Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions. London: Zed Books, pp. 251–268.

18.

Eyben

(2012) Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the purposes of development aid. European Journal of Development Research 25(1): 78–91.

19.

Ferguson

(1994) The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. London: The University of Minnesota Press.

20.

Gaventa

Tandon

(2010) Globalizing Citizens: New Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. New York: Zed Books.

21.

Gellner

(1986) Language, caste, religion and territory: Newar identity ancient and modern. European Journal of Sociology 27: 102–148.

22.

Hangen

(2007) Creating a ‘New Nepal’: The Ethnic Dimension. Washington, DC: East-West Center.

23.

Herring

(2005) Beyond the political impossibility theorem of Agrarian reform. In: Houtzager

Moore

(eds) Changing Paths: International Development and the New Politics of Inclusion. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 58–87.

24.

Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) (2013) DFID’s peace and security program in Nepal. Report 20. London: Independent Commission for Aid Impact.

25.

International Crisis Group (ICG) (2012) Nepal’s Constitution (I): Evolution not Revolution. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICG.

26.

Jha

(2012) Walk the talk: PM Bhattarai must rein in his bureaucrats, who are undermining an inclusive development agenda. The Kathmandu Post. Kathmandu, Nepal: Kantipur Publications Pvt. Ltd.

27.

Jones

Elgin-Cossart

Esberg

(2012) Pathways out of Fragility: The Case for a Research Agenda on Inclusive Political Settlements in Fragile States. New York: Center on International Cooperation, New York University.

28.

Kabeer

(2006) Poverty, social exclusion and the MDGs: The challenge of ‘Durable Inequalities’ in the Asian Context. IDS Bulletin 37(3): 64–78.

29.

Khan

(2009) Governance Capabilities and the Property Rights Transition in Developing Countries (Research Paper Series on Governance for Growth). London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

30.

Khan

(2010) Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions (Unpublished Manuscript). London: SOAS, University of London.

31.

Lawoti

(2007) Contentious politics in democratizing Nepal. In: Lawoti

(ed.) Contentious Politics and Democratization in Nepal. New Delhi, India: Sage, pp. 17–47.

32.

Laws

(2012) Political Settlements, Elite Pacts, and Governments of National Unity: A Conceptual Study. Background Paper 10. London: The Developmental Leadership Program (DLP).

33.

Leftwich

(1993) Governance democracy and development in the third world. Third World Quarterly 14(3): 605–624.

34.

Leftwich

(2011) Thinking and working politically: What does it mean, why is it important and how do you do it? In: Politics, leadership and coalitions in development: Policy implications of the DLP research evidence, research and policy workshop, Frankfurt, 10–11 March, pp. 3–11. Hawthorn, Australia: Development Leadership Program. Available at: http://www.dlprog.org/publications/politics-leadership-and-coalitions-in-development-policy-implications-of-the-dlp-research-evidence.php

35.

Levy

(2014) Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.

36.

Lindemann

(2008) Do inclusive elite bargains matter? A research framework for understanding the causes of civil war in Sub-Saharan Africa. Governance and Social Development Resource Center. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationaldevelopment/research/crisisstates/download/dp/dp15.pdf

37.

Ministry of Finance (MoF) (2014) Development Cooperation Report: Fiscal Year 2012-13. Singhadurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal: MoF, Government of Nepal.

38.

Mohanty

Thompson

Coelho

(2011) Mobilising the State? Social mobilisation and state interaction in India, Brazil and South Africa. Working Paper no. 359. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).

39.

Neupane

(2005) The Caste and Ethnicity Question: Caste and Ethnic Structure and Possibility of Partnership. Kathmandu, Nepal: Centre for Development Studies.

40.

Parks

Cole

(2010) Political Settlements: Implications for International Development policy and practice. Occasional Paper no. 2, July. San Francisco, CA: The Asia Foundation.

41.

Przeworski

(1991) Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

42.

Robins

(2012) Transitional justice as an elite discourse. Critical Asian Studies 44(1): 3–30.

43.

Ruckert

(2008) Making neo-Gramscian sense of the development assistance committee: Towards an inclusive neoliberal world development order. In: Mahon

McBride

(eds) The OECD and Transnational Governance. Vancouver, BC: University of British Colombia Press, pp. 96–113.

44.

Scoones

(2010) The politics of global assessments: The case of the IAASTD. In: Gaventa

Tandon

(eds) Globalizing Citizens: New Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. New York, NY: Zed Books, pp. 96–118.

45.

Seddon

(2012) A Dangerous Racism: The Nepali Times. Kathmandu, Nepal: Himalmedia Private Limited.

46.

Sen

(2000) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

47.

SI Action Group (SIAG) (2008) Workforce Diversity in International Agencies in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: SIAG.

48.

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) (2013) Swiss Cooperation Strategy for Nepal 2013-2017. Switzerland: SDC.

49.

Thapa

(2012) The Making of the Maoist Insurgency. In: Von Einsiedel

Malone

Pradhan

(eds) Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–57.

50.

The World Bank (2010) Nepal Public Expenditure Review. Kathmandu, Nepal: The World Bank.

51.

The World Bank (2014) Nepal country profile. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/country/nepal (accessed 30 November 2014).

52.

Tillin

Shneiderman

(2015) Restructuring states, restructuring ethnicity: Looking across disciplinary boundaries at federal futures in India and Nepal. Modern Asian Studies 49(1): 1–39.

53.

Toffin

(2014) The inclusive state: A philosophy and sociology of SI. In: Gurung

Tamang

Turin

(eds) Perspectives on SI and Exclusion in Nepal. Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal: Central Department of Sociology/Anthropology (CDSA) Tribhuvan University (TU), pp. 218–240.

54.

Transparency International (TI) (2014) Nepal’s corruption perception Index. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results

55.

United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) (2012) The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (2013–17). Kathmandu, Nepal: UNDP. Available at: http://un.org.np/sites/default/files/UNDAF_2013-2017.pdf

56.

Wiener

(2009) Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35(1): 175–193.

57.

Zwingel

(2012) How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in Transnational Perspective. International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 115–129.