The government, in its 1998 pensions Green Paper, has set out to establish a `New Insurance Contract'. It promises security in retirement for those who cannot afford to provide for themselves and a strengthened private pensions framework for those who can. In return, it expects individuals, wherever possible, to provide for their own retirement. This article argues that the security promised amounts to little more than greater means testing and complexity, and that the government's `strengthening' of private pensions actually results in greater risk being transferred to individual savers. The government recognizes some of the problems this approach creates, but its attempts to remedy them are not very credible. Nevertheless, the government will continue on its path because of its determination to reduce the state's role in pension provision. This article suggests that the `New Insurance Contract' is one that individual savers do not fully understand and may ultimately reject.
Bacon & Woodrow (2000) Stakeholder: The Impact on the Pension Scheme Map. London: Bacon & Woodrow.
2.
Blake, D. and Hudson, R. (2000) Improving Security and Flexibility in Retirement: Full Technical Report. London: Retirement Income Working Party.
3.
Blake, D. and Orszag, J.M. (1998) Labour and the Future of Pensions: A Reply to UK Pensions Minister John Denham. London: Pensions Institute.
4.
Boulding, A. (2000) `Time and Tide Wait for No IFA', Money Marketing (31 Aug.): 47-8.
5.
Clark, T. (2001) Recent Pensions Policy and the Pension Credit. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
6.
Costigan P., Finch, H., Jackson, B., Legard, R. and Ritchie, J. (1999) Overcoming Barriers: Older People and Income Support . London: DSS (Social Research Branch).
7.
Croden, N., Costigan, P. and Whitfield, G. (1999) Helping Pensioners: Evaluation of the Income Support Pilots. London: DSS (Social Research Branch).
8.
Delo, S. (2000) `Frankenstein's Monster', Pensions Management (Nov.): 58-9.
9.
Dilnot, A., Disney, R., Johnson, P. and Whitehouse, E. (1994) Pensions Policy in the UK: An Economic Analysis . London: Institute for Fiscal Studies .
10.
Disney, R., Emmerson, C. and Tanner, S. (1999) Partnership in Pensions: An Assessment. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
11.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (1998a) A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions, Green Paper. London: DSS.
12.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (1998b) New Ambitions for Our Country: A New Contract for Welfare, Green Paper. London: DSS.
13.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (1999) The Structure of Rebates for the Second State Pension. London: DSS.
14.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (2000a) Income Related Benefits: Estimates of Take-up in 1998/99. London: DSS.
15.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (2000b) Opportunity for All - One Year On: Making a Difference, second annual report . London: DSS.
16.
DSS (Department of Social Security) (2000c) The Pension Credit: A Consultation Paper. London: DSS.
17.
DSS (Department of Social Security)/Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (2000) Illustrations of Money Purchase Pensions: A Consultation Document. London: DSS.
18.
Financial Services Consumer Panel (2000) `Financial Services Consumer Panel Response to: "The FSA's Approach to the Regulation of the Conduct of Stakeholder Pensions Business" ', discussion paper. London: Financial Services Consumer Panel.
19.
FSA (Financial Services Authority) (1999) Consumer Education: A Strategy for Promoting Public Understanding of the Financial System. London: FSA.
20.
FSA (Financial Services Authority) (2000a) Better Informed Consumers: Assessing the Implications for Consumer Education of Research by BMRB. London: FSA .
21.
FSA (Financial Services Authority) (2000b) Stakeholder Pensions Decision Trees: A Stage-by-stage Guide to the Development of a Stakeholder Pension Decision Tree. London: FSA.
22.
FSA (Financial Services Authority) (2001) Regulation of Stakeholder Pensions: Feedback on CP61. London: FSA.
23.
FSA (Financial Services Authority) and Vass, J. (1998) A Guide to the Provision of Financial Services Education for Consumers. London: FSA.
24.
Glendinning, J. (2000) `A Transformation as the Market Widens', Money Marketing (24 Aug.): 42.
25.
Harrison, D. (1999) Stakeholder Pensions: Sink or Swim. London: Financial Times.
26.
Johnson, P. (2000) CAT Standards and Stakeholders. London: FSA.
27.
Jones, R. (2001a) `A Last Call for Final Salary Schemes', Guardian (21 Apr.): 4.
28.
Jones, R. (2001b) `What Have All these Companies Got in Common?' , Guardian (28 Apr.): 2.
29.
Monks, H. (2000) `Research Finds Outflow from Final Salary Is Accelerating' , Money Marketing (12 Oct.): 10.
30.
Myners, P. (2001) Institutional Investment in the UK: A Review. London: HM Treasury.
31.
NCC (National Consumer Council) (1999) Consumer Concerns 1999: Consumers' Views of Advice and Information on Financial Services. London: NCC.
32.
Nye, V. (1998) Financial Education and the Role of the Regulator: The Limits of Caveat Emptor. London: Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation.
33.
Pension Provision Group (1999) Response to the Pensions Green Paper, `A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions'. London: Pension Provision Group.
34.
Pension Provision Group (2001) A Commentary on the Pension Credit Proposals. London: Pension Provision Group.
35.
Pension Provision Task Force (2001) The Size of the State Pension. London: Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.
36.
Powdrill, T. (2001a) `Newsagents Shut Schemes in Favour of Stakeholder' . [http://www.iiq.com/news] Accessed 14 February 2001.
37.
Powdrill, T. (2001b) `Only One in Ten Think DC Provision Is Adequate' . [http://www.iiq.com/news] Accessed 11 April 2001.
38.
Rake, K., Falkingham, J. and Evans, M. (1999) `Tightropes and Tripwires: New Labour's Proposals and Means-testing in Old Age', Casepaper 23. London: STICERD.
39.
Ring P. ( 2000) `Education, Advice, and the Financial Services Authority's Statutory Objective', Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance8(4): 333-43.
40.
Rowlingson, K. (2000) Fate, Hope and Insecurity: Future Orientation and Forward Planning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
41.
Targett, S. (2001) `Cost of Running Pension Schemes Forces Employers to Take Action', The Financial Times (5 Jan.): 3.
42.
Timmins, N. (1999) `Pensions Policy Is Based on "False Analysis" ', The Financial Times (9Aug.): 5.
43.
Timmins, N. (2000) `Means Testing "a Step Backwards" ', The Financial Times (4 Dec.): 5.
44.
Turner, P. (2001) `Illustrating the Benefits of DC', Pensions Management (Jan.): 56.
45.
Wadsworth, M., Findlater, A. and Boardman, T. ( 2001) Reinventing Annuities. London: Staple Inn Actuarial Society.
