This paper advocates a holistic approach to the study of agricultural sustainability. Alternative approaches to sustainability must address both methods of analysis and policy-making. However, current agricultural research and practice suffer from the lack of appropriate analytical framework and policy-making tool to substantiate the notion of sustainable agricultural development. To narrow the gap between the rhetoric and the practice of agricultural sustainability, it is urgent to seek alternative approaches that can provide effective information and at the same time, facilitate improved policy-making processes. An ecological economics framework, which recognises the fundamental interdependence of human-natural interactions, is proposed for the transdisciplinary analysis of agricultural policy. A system dynamics modelling approach, which attempts to help decision-makers identify the knowledge gap and select a preferred course of action among several feasible alternatives, is regarded as a workable template from which the necessary transdisciplinary analysis is articulated and the gained insight is integrated into the policy-making process. It is highlighted in this paper that the methodological synthesis of the transdisciplinary analytical framework of ecological economics and the computer precision of system dynamics modelling may offer a holistic approach for effective policy analysis and improved policy-making towards the realisation of agricultural sustainability.
AntleJ.M.CapalboS.M. (2002). “Agriculture as a managed ecosystem: policy implications”Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(1), 1–15.
2.
BolandL.A. (1997). Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal OdysseyLondon, Routledge.
3.
CapraF. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and MatterLondon, Flamingo.
4.
CarrierD. (1992). “A methodology for pattern modelling nonlinear macroeconomic dynamics”Journal of Economic Issues, 26(1), 221–242.
5.
ChecklandP. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems PracticeChichester, Wiley and Sons.
6.
CostanzaR.WaingerL.FolkeC.MälerK.G. (1993). “Modelling complex ecological economic systems: toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature”Bioscience, 43(8), 545–555.
7.
CostanzaR.WaingerL.BockstealN. (1996). “Integrating spatially explicit ecological and economic models” in CostanzaR.SeguraO.Martinez-AlierJ. (eds) Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological EconomicsWashington, D.C., Island Press, 249–284.
8.
CostanzaR.RuthM. (1997). “Dynamic systems modelling for scoping and consensus building” in DragunA.K.JakobssonK.M. (eds) Sustainability and Global Environmental Policy: New PerspectivesCheltenham, Edward Elgar, 279–307.
9.
CostanzaR.DupliseaD.KautskyU. (1998). “Modelling ecological and economic systems with STELLA”Ecological Modelling110, 1–4.
10.
CostanzaR.LowB.S.OstromE.WilsonJ. (eds), (2001). Institutions, Ecosystems, and SustainabilityBoca Raton, Florida, Lewis Publishers.
11.
DeweyJ. (1929). “The quest for certainty” in BoydstonJ. (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works (1984), Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press.
12.
DörnerD. (1980). “On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity”Simulationand Games, 11(1), 87–106.
13.
DoversS.R.HandmerJ.W. (1992). “Uncertainty, sustainability and change”Global Environmental Change, 262–276.
14.
FaucheuxS.O’ConnorM. (eds) (1998). Valuation for Sustainable Development: Methods and Policy IndicatorsCheltenham, Edward Elgar.
15.
ForresterJ.W. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning PracticeAlbany, State University of New York Press.
16.
FuntowiczS.O.RavetzJ.R. (1991). “A new scientific methodology for global environmental issue” in CostanzaR. (ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of SustainabilityNew York, Columbia University Press, 137–152.
17.
GillR.A.WolfendenJ.A.J. (1998). “A system dynamics based planning solution for integrated environmental management and policy: the Idea Ma P toolbox” in Proceedingsof the 16th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (CD-ROM), July20–23, 1998, Quebec.
18.
GorelickS. (1977). “Undermining hierarchy: problems of schooling in capitalist America”Monthly Review (October), 20–33.
19.
GrantW.E.PedersenE.K.MarínS.L. (eds), (1997). Ecology and Natural Resource Management: Systems Analysis and SimulationNew York, John Wiley & Sons.
20.
HannonB.RuthM. (1994). Dynamic ModelingNew York, Springer-Verlag.
21.
HicksM.J. (1991). Problem Solving in Business and Management: Hard, Soft and Creative ApproachesLondon, Chapman & Hall.
22.
HusserlE. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental PhenomenologyEvanston, Northwestern University Press.
23.
IkerdJ.E. (1993). “The need for a system approach to sustainable agriculture”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 46, 147–160.
24.
IsardW. (1972). Ecological-Economic Analysis for Regional DevelopmentNew York, The Free Press.
25.
LaszloE. (1972). The System View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developmentsin SciencesNew York, Gorge Braziller.
26.
LawnP.A. (2001). Toward Sustainable Development: An Ecological Economics ApproachBoca Raton, Lewis Publishers.
27.
LiD.LiuC. (1988). “Application of loop analysis to agro-ecological engineering” in MaS. (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Agro-Ecological Engineering, Beijing (in Chinese).
28.
LiX. (1995). “An approach to the method of eco-benefit synthetic evaluation of agroecosystem”Rural Eco-Environment, 11(2), 25–27 (in Chinese).
29.
LorenzE. (1993). The Essence of ChaosSeattle, University of Washington Press.
30.
Martinez-FernandezJ.Esteve-SelmaM.A.Calvo-SendinJ.F. (2000). “Environmental and socio-economic interactions in the evolution of traditional irrigated lands: A dynamic system model”Human Ecology, 28(2), 279–299.
31.
MeadowsD.H.RichardsonJ.BruckmannG. (1982). Groping in the Dark: The First Decade of Globing ModellingNew York, Wiley.
32.
M’GonigleR.M. (1999). “Ecological economics and political ecology: towards a necessary synthesis”Ecological Economics, 28, 11–26.
33.
MidmoreP. (1996). “Towards a postmodern agricultural economics”Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47(1), 1–17.
34.
MilonJ.W.ShogrenJ.F. (eds) (1995). Integrating Economic and Ecological Indicators: Practical Methods for Environmental Policy AnalysisWestport, Connecticut, Praeger.
35.
NorgaardR.B. (1989). “The case for methodological pluralism”Ecological Economics, 1, 37–57.
36.
PerringsC.TurnerK.FolkeC. (1995). Ecological economics: the study of interdependenteconomic and ecological systemsDiscussion Paper 9501, Department of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, University of York, Heslington.
37.
RadzickiM.J. (1988). “Institutional dynamics: an extension of the institutionalist approach to socio-economic analysis”Journal of Economic, 22(3), 633–665.
38.
RichardsonG.P.PughA.L. (1981). Introduction to System Dynamics Modelling with DYNAMOCambridge, MIT Press.
39.
RichardsonG.P. (1991). Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems TheoryPhiladelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press.
40.
RobertsN.AndersenD.F.DealR.M.GrantM.S.SchafferW.A. (1983). Introduction to Computer Simulation: The System Dynamics Modelling ApproachReading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
41.
SaeedK. (1994). Development Planning and Policy Design: A System Dynamics ApproachAldershot, Avebury.
42.
SavoryA. (1991). “Holistic resource management: a conceptual framework for ecologically sound economic modelling”Ecological Economics, 3, 181–191.
43.
SengeP. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning OrganizationNew York, Doubleday.
44.
ShiT. (1996). “Study on the industrial structure optimisation and adjustment of western Hubei Province’s Xiangxi River basin”Journal of Hubei University, 2(18), 183–189 (in Chinese).
45.
ShiT. (2002). “Ecological agriculture in China: bridging the gap between rhetoric and practice of sustainability”Ecological Economics, 42(3), 359–368.
46.
ShiT. (2004). “Ecological economics: moving towards a transdisciplinary research on sustainability”Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 15(1), 61–81.
47.
Shurmer-SmithP. (2002). Doing Cultural GeographyLondon, SAGE Publications.
48.
SternD.I. (1997). “The capital theory approach to sustainability: a critical appraisal”Journalof Economic, 31(1), 145–173.
49.
StewenM. (1998). “The interdependence of allocation, distribution, scale and stability – a comment on Herman E. Daly’s vision of an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable”Ecological Economics, 27, 119–130.
50.
SunH. (1993). Theory and Methodology of Ecological AgricultureJi’nan, Shangdong Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).
51.
van den BerghJ.C.J.M.NijkampP. (1991). “Operationalising sustainable development: dynamic ecological economic models”Ecological Economics, 4, 11–33.
52.
van den BerghJ.C.J.M.NijkampP. (1994). “Modelling ecologically sustainable economic development in a region: a case study in the Netherlands”The Annual of Regional Science, 28, 7–29.
53.
VedeldP.O. (1994). “The environment and interdisciplinary: ecological and neoclassical economical approaches to the use of natural resources”Ecological Economics, 10, 1–13.
54.
VennixJ.A.M. (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System DynamicsChichester, John Wiley & Sons.
55.
WaltersC.J. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable ResourcesNew York, Macmillan.
56.
Waltner-ToewsD. (1996). “Ecosystem health – a framework for implementing sustainability in agriculture”Bio Science, 46(9), 686–689.
57.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our Common FutureNew York, Oxford University Press.
58.
WolstenholmeE.F. (1999). “Qualitative vs. quantitative modelling: the evolving balance”Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(4), 422–428.
