Malnutrition and changes in body composition are common in pediatric cancer patients and are often underestimated during outpatient care. Simple anthropometric tools and functional assessments may enhance nutritional screening and clinical monitoring in this population. This study aims to investigate the relationship between anthropometric indicators, handgrip strength (HGS), and dietary intake in children and adolescents undergoing cancer treatment, compared to healthy peers.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 45 participants (15 cancer patients and 30 age- and sex-matched controls). Assessments included arm and calf circumferences, tricipital skinfold, arm muscle circumference, HGS via dynamometry, and a 3-day dietary record classified using the NOVA system.
Results
The cancer group reported significantly lower consumption of ultra-processed foods compared to controls (p = 0.039). Anthropometric indicators and HGS were significantly lower in the cancer group (p < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was found between HGS and calf circumference (r > 0.80). In the total sample, 42.2% were eutrophic, while 51.1% were classified as overweight or obese.
Conclusion
HGS and basic anthropometric measurements may serve as supportive tools for early identification of nutritional risk. Integrating these indicators into routine outpatient care may support targeted interventions and promote dietary quality in children with chronic illnesses.
ArendsJBachmannPBaracosV, et al. (2017) ESPEN Guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition36(1): 11–48.
2.
BarbosaRMFGorettiPFChagasPSC (2024) Muscle strength, functional mobility, and performance in activities of daily living in children and adolescents with cancer. European Journal of Pediatrics184(1): 28.
3.
BarrRDStevensMCG (2020) The influence of nutrition on clinical outcomes in children with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer67(Suppl 3): e28117.
4.
Brasil (2014) Guia alimentar para a população brasileira, 2 edBrasiila: Ministério da Saúde.
5.
CoxCLZhuLKasteSC, et al. (2018) Modifying bone mineral density, physical function, and quality of life in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatric Blood & Cancer65(4): 10.1002/pbc.26929.
6.
De AmicisRMambriniSPPellizzariM, et al. (2022) Ultra-processed foods and obesity and adiposity parameters among children and adolescents: a systematic review.(1436–6215 (Electronic)).
7.
DiakatouVVassilakouT (2020) Nutritional status of pediatric cancer patients at diagnosis and correlations with treatment, clinical outcome and the long-term growth and health of survivors. Children (Basel)7(11): 218.
8.
FabozziFTrovatoCMDiamantiA, et al. (2022) Management of nutritional needs in pediatric oncology: a consensus statement. Cancers (Basel)14(14): 3378.
9.
FioletTSrourBSellemL, et al. (2018) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: Results from NutriNet-Sante prospective cohort. BMJ360: k322.
10.
INCA (2015) Consenso Nacional de Nutrição Oncológica. 2 edRio de Janeiro, Brazil: INCA.
11.
INCA (2026) Cancer Incidence in Brazil: 2026 Estimates. RIo de Janeiro: INCA.
12.
ISAK (2001) International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. 1 edPotchefstroom, South Africa: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
13.
IsaksenIMDankelSN. Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.(1532–1983 (Electronic)).
14.
LiRDonnellaHKnouseP, et al. (2017) A randomized nutrition counseling intervention in pediatric leukemia patients receiving steroids results in reduced caloric intake. Pediatric Blood & Cancer64(2): 374–380.
15.
LovellALMakamoNVealGJ, et al. (2025) Nutritional status, body composition and chemotherapy dosing in children and young people with cancer: A systematic review by the SIOP nutrition network. British Journal of Cancer133(3): 275–285.
16.
MaticsTJKhanNJaniP, et al. (2017) The fragility index in a cohort of pediatric randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine6(8): 79.
17.
MonteiroCACannonGLevyRB, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them.(1475–2727 (Electronic)).
18.
MoubaracJCParraDCCannonG, et al. (2014) Food classification systems based on food processing: Significance and implications for policies and actions: A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment. Current Obesity Reports3(2): 256–272.
19.
MullenA (2020) Ultra-processed food and chronic disease. Nature Food1(12): 771–771.
20.
NathanPC (2023) Vulnerable populations in childhood cancer research and clinical care. Cancer129(10): 1476–1478.
21.
OrgelESpostoRMalvarJ, et al. (2014) Impact on survival and toxicity by duration of weight extremes during treatment for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology32(13): 1331–1337.
22.
OrssoCETibaesJRBOliveiraCLP, et al. (2019) Low muscle mass and strength in pediatrics patients: Why should we care?(1532–1983 (Electronic)).
23.
PuthenpuraVJiLXuX, et al. (2023) Loss to follow-up of minorities, adolescents, and young adults on clinical trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer129(10): 1547–1556.
24.
QuattrocchiAGarufiGGugliandoloG, et al. (2024) Handgrip strength in health applications: a review of the measurement methodologies and influencing factors. Sensors (Basel)24(16): 5100.
25.
Ramirez-VelezRTordecilla-SandersACorrea-BautistaJE, et al. (2016) Handgrip strength and ideal cardiovascular health among Colombian children and adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics179: 82–89 e81.
26.
RayarMWebberCENayiagerT, et al. (2013) Sarcopenia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology35(2): 98–102.
27.
RitzAKolorzJHubertusJ, et al. (2021) Sarcopenia is a prognostic outcome marker in children with high-risk hepatoblastoma. Pediatric Blood & Cancer68(5): e28862.
28.
RitzALurzEBergerM (2022) Sarcopenia in children with solid organ tumors: An instrumental era. Cells11(8): 1278.
29.
SiegelRLGiaquintoANJemalA (2024) Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians74(1): 12–49.
30.
TrutschniggBKilgourRDReinglasJ, et al. (2008) Precision and reliability of strength (jamar vs. Biodex handgrip) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vs. Bioimpedance analysis) measurements in advanced cancer patients. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism33(6): 1232–1239.
31.
VandevijvereSDe RidderKFioletT, et al. (2019) Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. European Journal of Nutrition58(8): 3267–3278.
32.
VerwaaijenEJvan der TorrePVormoorJ, et al. (2023) Novel adaption of the SARC-F score to classify pediatric hemato-oncology patients with functional sarcopenia. Cancers (Basel)15(1): 320.
33.
VianiKBarrRDFilhoVO, et al. (2021) Nutritional status at diagnosis among children with cancer referred to a nutritional service in Brazil. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther43(4): 389–395.
34.
VianiKTrehanAManzoliB, et al. (2020) Assessment of nutritional status in children with cancer: A narrative review. Pediatric Blood & Cancer67(Suppl 3): e28211.
35.
WHO (1995) Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry.Geneva: WHO.
36.
WHO (2021) Standards for Healthy Eating, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep. Geneva: WHO.
37.
ZemburaMMatusikP (2022) Sarcopenic obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)13: 914740.
