Are Brothels Markets? Situating Consumer Research at the Nexus of the Essential,the Embarrassing and the Exception: A Viewpoint from Sociological Traditions
Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online February, 2025
Are Brothels Markets? Situating Consumer Research at the Nexus of the Essential,the Embarrassing and the Exception: A Viewpoint from Sociological Traditions
This essay critiques the trend in consumer research that deliberately excludes subjects considered exceptional. Drawing from multiple traditions in sociological literature, we analyse the interaction of factors that create persistent paradoxes in social imaginaries - paradoxes that have also impacted the academic community. While the majority of scholarly publications tend to take a reductionist view of consumer concerns, the vulnerabilities faced by queer groups and sex workers are largely ignored, with sex workers being pushed to the absolute margins. The relentless pursuit of tokenism, quantified by novel contributions or citations, has further marginalized invisible narratives of hope and resilience. The article advocates for a more inclusive approach in the development of new areas of consumer research, particularly in the domains of macro marketing, public policy, and transformational consumer research.
ArnouldE. J., & PriceL. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 24–45.
2.
Benton JrR. (2021). Our obsolete marketing mentality: George fisk, meet Karl Polanyi. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 88–103.
3.
BinkleyS. (2003). The seers of Menlo Park: The discourse of heroic consumption in the ‘Whole Earth Catalog’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3(3), 283–313.
4.
BoltanskiL., & ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton University Press.
5.
CooperJ. X. (2004). Modernism and the Culture of Market Society. Cambridge University Press.
6.
DuftyR. (2007). Governing through locational choice: the locational preferences of rural public housing tenants in south-western New South Wales, Australia. Housing, Theory and Society, 24(3), 183–206.
7.
Dufty-JonesR. (2015). Governmentalities of mobility: The role of housing in the governance of Australian rural mobilities. Journal of Rural Studies, 42, 63–78.
8.
FeatherstoneM. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage
9.
FiskG., & MeyersP. (1982). Macromarketers’ guide to paradigm development. In BushR. and HuntS. D. (Eds.), Marketing theory: Philosophy of science perspectives (pp. 281–285). AMA.
10.
GurrieriL., ProtheroA., BettanyS., DobschaS., DrentenJ., FergusonS., & Tuncay ZayerL. (2022). Feminist academic organizations: Challenging sexism through collective mobilizing across research, support, and advocacy. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(5), 2158–2179.
11.
HarrisL. C., & OgbonnaE. (1999). Developing a market oriented culture: A critical evaluation. Journal of Management Studies, 36(2), 177–196.
12.
JagdS. (2004). Laurent Thévenot and the French Convention School: A short introduction. Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, 5(3), 2–9.
KotiswaranP. (2008). Born unto brothels—Toward a legal ethnography of sex work in an Indian red-light area. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(3), 579–629.
15.
LaytonR. A. (2007). Marketing systems—A core macro marketing concept. Journal of macromarketing, 27(3), 227–242.
16.
MitraN., HillR. P., ChaudhuriH. R., & ChaudhuriA. (2022). Identity management as a coping strategy for stigmatization: The case of Indian sex workers in a libidinal market. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41(2), 124–140.
17.
O’ShaughnessyJ., & O’ShaughnessyN. J. (2000). Treating the nation as a brand: Some neglected issues. Journal of macromarketing, 20(1), 56–64.
18.
PreeceC., DaskalopoulouA., & SchauH. (2023). Troubled times demand heroes: Heroic marketing and marketing heroes. Marketing Theory, 23(1), 3–9.
19.
ProtheroA. (2006). The F word: The use of fear in advertising to mothers. Advertising & society review, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2007.0026
20.
ProtheroA. (2023). Me, the patriarchy, and the business school. Journal of Management Studies, 61(3), 1152–1159.
21.
ProtheroA., & TadajewskiM. (2021). # MeToo and beyond: Inequality and injustice in marketing practice and academia. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(1–2), 1–20.
22.
RitzerG. (2014). Prosumption: Evolution, revolution, or eternal return of the same?Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 3–24.
23.
SaatciogluB., & CorusC. (2019). Towards a macromarketing and consumer culture theory intersection: Participatory and deliberative methodologies. Journal of Macromarketing, 39(1), 9–24.
24.
SharmaE., & HillR. P. (2020). Consumer vulnerability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 551–570
25.
StarkD. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press.
26.
ThompsonC. J., & ÜstünerT. (2015). Women skating on the edge: Marketplace performances as ideological edgework. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 235–265.
27.
TumbatG., & BelkR. W. (2011). Marketplace tensions in extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 42–61.
28.
YoungI. M. (2003). The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29(1), 1–25.
