The present study explored a relationship between protean career orientation (PCO) and career outcomes (i.e., subjective and objective career success) on millennial IT professionals. A model proposing that the effect of PCO on career outcomes is mediated by career decision self-efficacy was assessed. Data were collected from 1,000 respondents, out of which 685 questionnaires were considered for analysis purpose. Of all the respondents, 470 (68.6%) respondents were male and 215 (31.4%) were female. All the respondents were within the age group of 25–40 years (completed age as of 2019). From the total respondents, 40.4% (277) were BTech, 25.8% (177) were MCA, 17.7% (121) were MBAs and 16.1% (110) respondents were from other educational background. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS for verification of the questionnaire. Hayes process model, type-4 in SPSS 21, was used for testing the mediation. The findings of the study revealed that protean individuals experienced higher levels of subjective and objective career success (on salary). Mediation effect was supported for subjective career success.
AbeleA. E., & SpurkD. (2009). How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x4709
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2007). Suffering, selfish, slackers? Myths and reality about emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(1), 23–29.
3.
ArthurM. B., KhapovaS. N., & WilderomC. P. M. (2005). Career success in a boundaryless career world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 177–202.
4.
AydogmusC. (2018). Millennial knowledge workers: The roles of protean career attitudes and psychological empowerment on the relationship between emotional intelligence and subjective career success. Career Development International, 24(4), 297–314.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
7.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
8.
BaruchY. (2006). Career development in organizations and beyond: Balancing traditional and contemporary viewpoints. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 125–138.
9.
BetzN. E., KleinK. L., & TaylorK. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400103.
10.
BetzN. E., & LuzzoD. A. (1996). Career assessment and the career decision-making self efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(4), 413–428.
11.
BriscoeJ. P., & HallD. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.002
12.
CaoL., HirschiA., & DellerJ. (2013). The positive effects of a protean career attitude for self-initiated expatriates: Cultural adjustment as a mediator. Career Development International, 18(1), 56–77.
13.
CheungR., & JinQ. (2015). Impact of a career exploration course on career decision making, adaptability, and relational support in Hong Kong. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599390.
14.
ChoiB. Y., ParkH., YangE., LeeS. K., LeeY., & LeeS. M. (2011). Understanding career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development, 39(5), 443–460.
15.
ChuiH., LiH., & NgoH. (2020). Linking protean career orientation with career optimism: Career adaptability and career decision self-efficacy as mediators. Journal of Career Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845320912526
16.
CordeiroH. T. D., & AlbuquerqueL. G. (2017). Career profiles of generation Y and their potential influencers. Brazilian Administration Review, 14(3), 1–21
17.
CoetzeeM., & De VilliersM. (2010). Sources of job stress, work engagement and career orientations of employees in a South African financial institution. Southern African Business Review, 14(1), 27–58. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC92903.
18.
DayR., & AllenT.D. (2004). The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 72–91.
19.
De VosA., & SoensN. (2008). Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.08.007
20.
GreenhausJ. H., ParasuramanS., & WormleyW. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86.
21.
HackettG., & BetzN. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339.
22.
HallD. T. (1976). Careers in organizations. Scott Foresman & Co.
23.
HallD. T., & MirvisP. H. (1996). The new protean career: Psychological success and the path with a heart. In HallD. T. (Ed.), The career is dead—long live the career: A relational approach to careers (pp. 15–45). Jossey-Bass.
24.
HayesA. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
25.
HerrmannA., HirschiA., & BaruchY. (2015). The protean career orientation as predictor of career outcomes: Evaluation of incremental validity and mediation effects. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.008
26.
HigginsM. C., DobrowS. R., & ChandlerD. (2008). Never quite good enough: The paradox of sticky developmental relationships for elite university graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 207–224.
27.
KimS., MoneM. A., & KimS. (2008). Relationships among self-efficacy, pay-for- performance perceptions, and pay satisfaction: A Korean examination. Human Performance, 21(2), 158–179.
28.
KimB., RheeE., HaG., YangJ., & LeeS. M. (2016). Tolerance of uncertainty: Links to happenstance, career decision self-efficacy, and career satisfaction. The Career Development Quarterly, 64(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12047
29.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
30.
KomarrajuM., SwansonJ., & NadlerD. (2013). Increased career self-efficacy predicts college students’ motivation, and course and major satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713498484
31.
LentR. W., BrownS. D., & HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
32.
LiH., NgoH., & CheungF. (2019). Linking protean career orientation and career decidedness: The mediating role of career decidedness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103322
33.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
34.
PWC (2011). Millenials at workplace. www.pwc.com
35.
NASSCOM (2019). The IT-BPM sector in India. https://nasscom.in/sites/default/files/uploads/temp/NASSCOM_Strategic_Review_2019_Decoding_Digital_Secured_15032019.pdf
36.
NautaM. M. (2004). Self-efficacy as a mediator of the relationships between personality factors and career interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 381–394.
37.
NgT. W. H., EbyL. T., SorensenK. L., & FeldmanD. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
38.
NgE. S. W., SchweitzerL., & LyonsL. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4
39.
SaksA. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 211–225.
40.
SeibertS. E., CrantJ. M., & KraimerM. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427.
41.
ShockleyK. M., UreksoyH., RodopmanO. B., PoteatL. F., & DullaghanT. R. (2016). Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 128–153.
42.
SmolaK. W., & SuttonC. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363–382.
43.
SrinivasanV. (2012). Multi generations in the workforce: Building collaboration. IIMB Management Review, 24(1), 48–66.
44.
StumpfS. A., & TymonW. G. (2012). The effects of objective career success on subsequent subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 345–353.
45.
SupeliA., & CreedP. A. (2015). The longitudinal relationship between protean career orientation and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention-to-quit. Journal of Career Development, 43(1), 66–80.
46.
TsaiC., HsuH., & YangC. (2017). Career decision self-efficacy plays a crucial role in hospitality undergraduates’ internship efficacy and career preparation. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 21(A), 61–68.
47.
ValcourM., & LadgeJ. J. (2008). Family and career path characteristics as predictors of women’s objective and subjective career success: Integrating traditional and protean career explanations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 300–309.
48.
VolmerJ., & SpurkD. (2010). Protean and boundaryless career attitudes: relationships with subjective and objective career success. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarkt Forschung, 43(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-010-0037-3
49.
ZajacovaA., LynchS. M., & EspenshadeT. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46, 677–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z
