Historically, the role of ‘self-help groups’ (SHGs) has been highlighted by different authors. The term used widely as cooperation for survival. SHGs play a significant role in transforming the rural economy. Its unprecedented growth helps the resurgence of the weaker section of society in terms of outreach, social position and sustainability. Among different SHGs, ‘Kudumbashree’ of Kerala constitute the largest women SHGs in India. The Government of Kerala launched the programme for poor women on 17 May 1998. Grassroots of ‘Kudumbashree’ are ‘Neighbourhood Groups’ (NHGs). Kudumbashree functions through NHGs.
The present study analyses the social impact of NHGs by taking samples from the tribal and non-tribal areas in the district of Palakkad, Kerala. A detailed survey conducted among 600 respondents with identified social variables. The outcome of the study reveals that NHGs have created a social platform for women to improve social activities and strengthen its members’ social bondage. The social impacts in tribal and non-tribal areas differ for certain social variables and do not vary with others. Overall, the study highlights the need for promoting the role of NHGs as a means of ‘social change’ for strengthening the socialization process of women.
AbdulR. A. (2005). Women’s self-help group for alleviating poverty. Kisan World, 32(7), 37.
2.
AnandS. J. (2002). Self-help groups in empowering women: A case study of selected SHGs and NHGs (Discussion Paper No. 38). Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies.
3.
AntonyJ. K., & ArunachalamP. (2018). Impact of social training of kudumbashree mission on tribal neighbourhood group (NHG) members. Cognitive Discourses International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(5), 33.
4.
ArunS., ArunT., & DeviU. (2011). Transforming livelihoods and assets through participatory approaches: The Kudumbashree in Kerala, India. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.533048
5.
AsokenR., & SudhaT. (2005). Economic status of rural women SHGs in Nagapattinam District (with special reference to Elumagalur Village). Cooperative Perspective, 39(4), 52–58.
6.
BaliS. R. (2007). Impacting women through microfinance. Dialogue. Appui au Development Autonome, 37(61), 82.
7.
BaliS. R., & WallentinF. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self-help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(5), 541–56.
8.
BanR., GilliganM. J., & RiegerM. (2015). Self-help groups, savings, and social capital evidence from a field experiment in Cambodia (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7382). Development Research World Bank Group Impact Evaluation Team. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7382
9.
BandhyopadhyayD., YuganadharB. N., & AmitavaM. (2002). Convergence of programmes by empowering SHGs and PRIs. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(26), 2556–2561.
10.
BaskaranK., BadrinathV., RenganathanR., & GayathriR. (2017). Self help groups (SHGs) and their utilization of Mahatma Gandhi NREGS (MGNREGS). International Journal of Economic Research, 14(8), 459–471.
11.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62.
12.
BhagawatiP. (2006). Cooperative sector: Changes required to operationally internalize concept of Micro-Finance. The Cooperator, 43(8), 355–359.
13.
BrankaertsJ. (1983). Birth of the movement: Early milestones. In PancoastD. L., ParkerP. & FrolandC. (Eds.), Rediscovering self-help: Its role in social care (pp. 143–158). Beverly Hills.
14.
ChathukulamJ., & GireesanK. (2007). Impact assessment of NREGS in Kerala evaluation of systems and processes. Centre For Rural Management (CRM).
15.
DamenS., MortelmansD., & HoveE. van. (2000). Self-help groups in Belgium: Their place in the care network. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 331–348.
16.
DasS. (2003). Self-help groups and microcredit (synergic integration), Kurukshetra. A Journal of Rural Development, 40(13), 25.
17.
DasJ., & AmitK. R. (2013). A comparative study on social adjustment among tribal and non-tribal students. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 12(3), 29–32. http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol12-issue3/E01232932.pdf
18.
DavidM. (1965). Perception of parental responses to illness: A research note. Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 6(4), 253–257.
19.
DeiningerK., & LiuY. (2009). Economic and social impacts of self-help groups in India [World Bank Policy Research Working Paper]. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4884.
20.
DesaiR. M., & JoshiS. (2013). Collective action and community development: Evidence from self-help groups in rural India (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6547). The World Bank Development Economics Vice Presidency Partnerships, Capacity Building Unit. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6547
21.
DevikaJ., & ThampiB. V. (2007). Between ‘empowerment’ and ‘liberation’: The Kudumbashree initiative in Kerala. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(1), 33–60.
22.
EDA Rural Systems Private Ltd & Andhra Pradesh Mahila Abhivruddhi Society (APMAS). (2006). Self help groups in India: A study of the lights and shade. https://www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-paper-self-help-groups-in-india-a-study-of-the-lights-and-shades-2006.pdf
23.
FreudenburgW. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1986), 451–478.
24.
GalabS., & RaoN. C. (2003). Women’s self-help groups, poverty alleviation and empowerment. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(12/13), 1274–1283.
25.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age, polity press. Cambridge.
26.
GopalanS., BhupathyR., & RajaH. (1995). Appraisal of success factors in nutrition relevant programs: A case study of Alappuzha community-based nutrition programme. United Nations Children Fund.
27.
GordonI. J., & CombsA. W. (1958). Growth, development, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 28(5), 433–444.
28.
Government of India (GOI). (2009). Report of the Committee on ‘Credit Related Issues Under SGSY. Department of Rural Development, Ministry of Rural Development.
29.
HerbertA., & ShepherdA. (2002). Spin-off study: Impact assessment for poverty reduction. International Development Department, School of Public Policy. Part of DFID funded ‘Evaluation of DFID Support to Poverty Reduction’ London, EvD, DFID. DFID Evaluation Department, London Office.
30.
HjemdalO. K., NilsenS., & SeimS. (1998). Self-help: The art of pulling oneself together. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
31.
HoffmannV., RaoV., SurendraV., & DattaU. (2017). Relief from usury impact of a community-based microcredit program in rural India (Policy Research Working Paper No. 8021). Development Research World Bank Group Impact Evaluation Team. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8021
32.
HoggM. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
33.
HoopT. de., KempenL. van., LinssenR., & EerdewijkA. van. (2014). Women’s autonomy and subjective well-being: How gender norms shape the impact of self-help groups in Odisha, India. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 103–135.
34.
IchheiserG. (1966). Social perception and moral judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XXVI(4), 546–560.
35.
JohnJ. (2009). A study on Kudumbashree project: A poverty eradication programme in Kerala performance, impact and lessons for other states. Development Society. http://kudumbashree.org/storage/files/ort1w_kshree%20study%20report2.pdf
36.
JohnA. (2017). Socioeconomic changes and women empowerment through Kudumbashree mission: Study of Mukkam Municipality. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(55), 4120–4123.
37.
JonesJ. G. & GrieneeksJ. (2015). Measures of self-perception as predictors of scholastic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 201–203.
38.
JoseJ. (2015). Role of Kudumbashree and women empowerment: A study of Thiruvananthapuram municipal corporation areas in Kerala state, India. International Journal of Research: Granthaalayah, 3(12), 72–82.
39.
KadiyalaS. (2004). Scaling up Kudumbashree: Collective action for poverty alleviation and women’s empowerment (FCND Discussion Paper No. 180). International Food Policy Research Institute.
40.
KaplanG., & KillileaM. (Eds.). (1976). Support systems and mutual help: Multidisciplinary explorations. Grune and Stratton.
41.
KatzA. H., & BenderE. I. (Eds.). (1976). The strength in us: Self-help groups in the modern world. New Viewpoints.
42.
KempenL. van. (2009). The downside of women empowerment in India: An experimental inquiry into the role of exportations. Social Indicators Research, 94(3), 465–482.
43.
Kenkyûkai, Shiso no Kagaky. (Ed.). (1976). Shûdan: Sâkuru no SengoShisôshi(Groups: The Postwar History of Thought on Circles). Heibonsha.
44.
KennethK., & SeenaP. C. (2012). Socio-economic changes of women through Kudumbashree: A study from Puthenvelikkara (GP) of Kerala state, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2),1–7.
45.
KulkarniP., RenukaM., KumarS. D., HugaraS., AshokN. C., & RamaH. V. (2013). Perception of women self help group (SHG) members regarding rabies and its prevention in Urban Mysore. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research, 3(4), 11–16.
46.
KumarA., & JasheenaC. J. (2016). Kudumbashree: Promoting the self-help group model of empowerment through women entrepreneurship in Kerala: A study. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(6), 20–34.
47.
KumarN., RaghunathanK., ArrietaA., JilaniA., ChakrabartiS., MenonP., & QuisumbingA. R. (2019). Social networks, mobility, and political participation: The potential for women’s self-help groups to improve access and use of public entitlement schemes in India. World Development, 114, 28–41.
48.
KumaranK. P. (2005). Study of social capital and collective actions in self-help groups, NIRD research highlights 2003–2004. National Institute of Rural Development, Government of India.
49.
KumariT., & MishraA. P. (2015). Self-help groups (SHGs) and women’s development: A case study of the Varanasi district, India. Space and Culture, 2(4), 35–48.
50.
KunhamanM. (1980). Tribal economy of Kerala: The North–South dichotomy. Journal of Kerala Studies, 7(March–December).
51.
Lahiri-DuttK., & SamantaG. (2006). Constructing social capital: Self-help groups and rural women’s development in India. Geographical Research, 44(3), 285–295.
52.
LataneB., & WolfS. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438–453.
53.
LenkaC., & MohantaY. (2015). Empowerment of women through participation in self-help groups: A study in the tribal area. International Journal of Home Science Extension & Communication Management, 2(2), 126–131.
54.
LeungJ., & ArthurD. G. (2004). Clients and facilitators’ experiences of participating in a Hong Kong self help group for people recovering from mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13(4), 232–241.
55.
LuizA. A. D. (1961). Tribes of Kerala. Bharatiya Adimath Sevak Sangh.
56.
MathurP. & AgarwalP. (2017). Self-help groups: A seed for intrinsic empowerment of Indian rural women. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 36(2), 182–196.
57.
MatzatJ. R., & Iller-SturmhofelS. (2010). Treating alcoholism as a chronic disease: Approaches to long-term continuing care. Alcoholic Research and Health, 33(4), 356–370.
58.
MinimolM. C., & MakeshK. G. (2012). Empowering rural women in Kerala: A study on the role of self help groups (SHGs). International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 4(9), 270–280.
59.
MoellerM. L. (1978). Self-help groups: Self-treatment and self-knowledge in self-responsible small groups. Rowohtl.
60.
MoosR. H. (2008). Active ingredients of substance use-focused self-help groups. Addiction, 103(3), 387–396.
MuruganK. R., & DharmalingamB. (2000). Self help groups: New women’s movements in Tamil Nadu. Social Welfare, 47(5), 9–12.
63.
NagarajB., & SundaramN. (2017). Effectiveness of self-help groups towards the empowerment of women in Vellore District, Tamil Nadu. Man in India, 97(2), 843–855.
64.
NairN. C. (2011). Impact of ‘Kudumbashree’ programme on rural women in Kottayam, District of Kerala. University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK. http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/91265
65.
NithyaN. R. (2013). Land question and the tribals of Kerala. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(9), 102–105. http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/sep2013/Land-Question-And-The-Tribals-Of-Kerala.pdf
66.
OjhaR. K. (2001). Self help groups and rural employment. Yojana, 25, 20–23.
67.
OommenM. A. (2007). Kudumbashree of Kerala: An appraisal. Institute of Social Sciences. http://www.kudumbashree.org
68.
PancoastD., ParkerP., & FrolandC. (1987). Rediscovery self-help: Its role in social care. SAGE Publications.
69.
PatelS. (2013). Empowerment of women through self help groups: A comparative study of tribal and non-tribal districts in Orissa (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Social Work, University of Delhi. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/31944
70.
PatelR., PatelM., & PatelN. (2018). Impact of microfinance on women empowerment: A study of rural Gujarat. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(8), 22–35.
71.
PrabhuS. M. A. (2015). Research study on overall performance of Kudumbashree unit with reference to Beeranthabail of Kasargod District, Kerala state. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social, Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(10), 31–35.
72.
PraveenK. V. & SureshA. (2015). Performance and sustainability of Kudumbashree neighbourhood groups in Kerala: An empirical analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 417–425.
73.
RaghavanV. P. (2009). Micro-credit and empowerment: A study of Kudumbashree projects in Kerala, India. Journal of Rural Development, 28(4), 469–484.
74.
RameshT., & MariaI. R. (2015). Financing of self-help groups and its impact on the members of self-help groups in Ramanathapuram district of Tamilnadu. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(55), 4262–4264.
75.
RaoA. (2016). Role micro-finance in the empowerment of tribal women. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advanced Research Trends, 1(3), 2349–7408.
76.
ReheemS. (2013). A case study on Kudumbashree: Political empowerment of women for sustainable poverty reduction. International Journal of Sustainability in Economic, Social, and Cultural Context, 8(1), 121–130.
77.
RobinsonD., & HenryS. (1977). Self-help and health: Mutual aid for modern problems. Martin Robert.
78.
RosenbergR., IsernJ., PrakashL. B., PillaiA., HashemiS., & ChristenR. P. (2007). Sustainability of self-help groups in India: two analyses (English) (CGAP Occasional Paper No. 12). World Bank Group.
79.
SachanaP. C., & AnilkumarA. (2015). Differential perception of livelihood issues of tribal women: The case of Attappadi the state in Kerala. India. International Journal of Applied and Pure Science and Agriculture, 1(8), 124–128.
80.
SahuG. B. (2015). How effective is a self-help group led microfinance programme in empowering women? Evidence from rural India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 50(5), 542–558.
81.
SalgaonkarS., & SalgaonkarP. B. (2009). Panchayats and women self help groups: Understanding the symbiosis. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 70(2), 481–494.
82.
Santhosh Kumar S. (2012). Capacity building through women groups. Journal of Rural Development, 31(2), 235–243.
83.
SanyalP. (2009). From credit to collective action: The role of microfinance in promoting women’s social capital and normative influence. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 529–550.
84.
SanyalP., RaoV., & MajumdarS. (2015). Recasting culture to undo gender: A sociological analysis of Jeevika in rural Bihar, India (Policy Research Working Paper Series 7411). The World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7411.html
85.
SchullerT. (2001). The complementary roles of human and social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 18–24.
86.
SelviS. C., & PushpaK. S. (2018). Factors influencing on rural women empowerment of Kudumbashree programme. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 7(1), 9220–9223.
87.
SharmaM., & AnsariE. (2014). Socio-economic impact of SHG on tribal women. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(6), 143–148.
88.
SIDNET. (2011). Poverty alleviation and participatory citizenship for women in Kerala, India (Policy Research Briefing No. 3).
89.
SinhaH. (2013). Tribal and poverty. Jharkhand Journal of Social Development, V(1–2), 1–14. http://iesd.org.in/jjsd/Journal%20pdf/2013-V-1&2%20Himadri%20Sinha.pdf
90.
SmithR. J. (1970). Comments on Ichheiser’s theory of social perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 30(3), 457–461.
91.
StangI., & MittelmarkM. B. (2009). Learning as an empowerment process in breast cancer self-help groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(14), 2049–2057.
92.
State Planning Board (2018). Economic review. Government of Kerala.
93.
Summer-EfflerE. (2002). The micro potential for social change: Emotion, consciousness, and social movement formation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 41–60.
94.
SundaramA. (2012). Impact of self-help group in socio-economic development of India. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social, Science (IOSR–JHSS), 5(1), 20–27.
95.
TendonS. L. (2001). Self help: New mantra for empowerment. Social Welfare, 48(7), 25–32.
96.
VargheseM. (2012). Women empowerment through Kudumbasree: A study in Ernakulam district. https://shodhgangotri.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/777/1/synopsis.pdf
97.
VattanoA. J. (1972). Power to the people: Self-help groups. Social Work, 17, 7–15.
98.
VenugopalanK. (2014). Influence of Kudumbasree on women empowerment: A study. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR–JBM), 16(10), 35–44. http://www.iosrjournals.org
99.
VyasR., & NalwayaN. (2018). Financial inclusion through microenterprises of rural SHGs: An empirical study in South Rajasthan. Marketing Techniques for Financial Inclusion and Development. 269–281. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4035-9.ch014IGIGlobal
100.
WilliamsG., BinithaV. T., NarayanaD., NandigamaS., & BhattacharyyaD. (2011). Performing participatory citizenship: Politics and power in Kerala’s Kudumbashree programme. Journal of Development Studies, 47(8), 1261–1280.
