We examined the multidimensional concept of empowerment in the context of women primary school teachers in India. We conducted interviews and then a questionnaire survey. Using structural equation modelling, we found that empowerment has two components: one is ‘latent empowerment’ (consisting of meaning, competence and impact); and the other is ‘action-oriented empowerment’ or autonomy. In teachers’ context, ‘latent empowerment’ affects both job satisfaction and innovative behaviour, whereas autonomy weakly influences only the innovative behaviour. ‘Latent empowerment’ mediates the relationship of workplace support with both job satisfaction and innovative behaviour. The role of information sharing in enhancing innovative behaviour through autonomy is weakly supported.
AktayS. (2008). The effect of the internet on the quality of education in primary schools. International Journal of Learning, 15(4), 81–87.
2.
AmenumeyE.K.LockwoodA. (2008). Psychological climate and psychological empowerment: An exploration in a luxury UK hotel group. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 8(4), 265–281.
3.
AppletonK. (2002). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393–410.
4.
Azim Premji Foundation (2004). The social context of elementary education in rural India. Retrieved January10, 2008, from http://azimpremjifoundation.org/downloads/TheSocialContextofElementaryEductaioninRuralIndia.pdf
5.
BaronReubeti M.KennyDavid A. (1986). Moderator–mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
6.
BanerjeeA.ColeS.DufloE.LindenL. (2005). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. NBER Working Paper 11904. Retrieved October30, 2008, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11904
7.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teachers’ perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1(2), 117–145.
8.
BrayfieldA.H.RotheH.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307–311.
9.
CarlessS.A. (2004). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction?Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 405–425.
10.
ChandV.S.Amin-ChoudhuryG. (2006). Teachers and socio-educational entrepreneurship: Competence as a consequence. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 97–114.
11.
ChandV.S.Amin-ChoudhuryG.InbarajJ. (2006). Aren’t four grades enough?: Primary school teachers’ innovations: Second yearbook. Ahmedabad: Ravi J. Mathai Centre for Educational Innovation, Indian Institute of Management Ahemdabad.
12.
ChandV.S.PatelG.B.NogasM.RabariC.K.ShukiaS.R. (1997). School, economy and society: The Rabari and Thakore communities of Banaskantha. Palanpur: District Institute of Education and Training, Government of Gujarat.
13.
ChaplainR.P. (1995). Stress and job satisfaction: A study of English primary school teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(4), 473–489.
ColG. (2006). The analysis of the social structural characteristic effecting perceptions of empowerment. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 33(1), 63–86.
16.
CongerJ.A.KanungoR.N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.
17.
Darling-HammondL.WiseA.E.PeaseS.R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.
18.
DeeJ.R.HenkinA.B.DuemerL. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257–277.
19.
DentonD.W.KleimanL.S. (2001). Job tenure as a moderator of the relationship between autonomy and satisfaction. Applied HRM Research, 6(2), 105–114.
20.
DyerC. (1996). Primary teachers and policy innovation in India: Some neglected issues. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(1), 27–40.
21.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
22.
GhaithG.YaghiH. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 451–458.
23.
GuskeyT.R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69.
24.
HoyW.K.Gage III C.Q.TarterJ.C. (2006). School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other?Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 236–255.
25.
HoyW.MiskelC. (1996). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (1997). Women’s progress in workforce improving worldwide, but occupational segregation still rife. ILO Communication and Public Information (Reference No. ILO/97/35). Retrieved January10, 2008, from http://www.ilo.int/global/About_the_ILO/Media_and_public_information/Press_releases/lang--en/WCMS_008040/index.htm
28.
JohnsonS.M. (1986). Incentives for teachers: What motivates, what matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 54–79.
29.
KanterR.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books Inc.
30.
KanterR.M. (1982). The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review, 60(4), 95–105.
31.
KaushikA.ShahP.J.ChavanM.DyerC.RamachandranV.SharmaR. (2009). Primary education in India: Current status and future challenges,Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 34(2), 61–90.
32.
KeiserN.M.ShenJ. (2000). Principal’s and teachers’ perceptions of teacher empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 7(3), 115–121.
33.
KellyK.O.AngS.Y.A.ChongW.L.HuW.S. (2008). Teacher appraisal and its outcomes in Singapore primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 39–54.
34.
KingdonG.G. (2007). The progress of school education in India. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 168–195.
35.
KirkmanB.L.RosenB. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74.
36.
KlineR.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Second Edition. New York: Gilford Press.
37.
KobergC.S.BossR.W.SenjemJ.C. (1999). Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 71–91.
38.
KorkmazI. (2008). Evaluation of teachers for restructured elementary curriculum (Grades 1 to 5). Education, 129(2), 250–258.
39.
KottkampR.B.MulhernJ.A.HoyK. (1987). Secondary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(3), 31–48.
40.
LidenR.C.WayneS.J.SparrowR.T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.
41.
LockeE.A. (1975). Personnel attitudes and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 26, 457–498.
42.
MaeroffG.I. (1988). The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence. New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
MalhotraA. (2002). Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Background Paper prepared for the World Bank Workshop on Poverty and Gender. Retrieved June22, 2008, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGENDER/Resources/MalhotraSchulerBoender.pdf
44.
MongeP.R.CozzensM.D.ContractorN.S. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3(2), 250–274.
45.
MuralidharanK. (2006). Public–private partnerships for quality education in India. Seminar, 565. Retrieved September22, 2009, from http://www.ccsindia.org/ccsindia/pdf/KarthikSeminarArticle.pdf
46.
OstroffC. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 963–974.
47.
PenningtonM. (1995). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29(4), 705–731.
48.
PodsakoffP.M.OrganD.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
49.
PurcellK.WiltonN.DaviesR.EliasP. (2005). Education as a career: Entry and exit from teaching as a profession. Research Report No. 690. Retrieved March, 2009 from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/publications/2005/purcell_et_al_2005_rr690.pdf
50.
RaoT.V.PareekU. (2006). Changing teacher behaviour through feedback. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press.
51.
RipleyR.E.RipleyM.J. (1992). Empowerment, the cornerstone of quality: Empowering management in innovative organizations in the 1990s. Management Decision, 30(4), 20–43.
52.
RummelR.J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
53.
SabanciA.SahinA. (2006). Competencies of non-departmental primary school classroom teachers. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 48(9), 548–556.
54.
ScottS.G.BruceR.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
55.
ScribnerJ.P.TruellA.D.HagerD.R.SrichaiS. (2001). An exploratory study of career and technical education teacher empowerment: Implications for school leaders. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 18(1), 46–57.
56.
SeibertS.E.SilverS.R.RandolphW.A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349.
57.
ShahR.GoldsteinS.M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 148–169.
58.
SharmaR.D.JyotiJ. (2006). Job satisfaction among school teachers. IIMB Management Review, 18(4), 349–363.
59.
SinghK. (1996). Intent to stay in teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 17(1), 37–47.
60.
SomechA. (2005). Teachers’ personal and team empowerment and their relations to organizational outcomes: Contradictory or compatible constructs?Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237–266.
61.
SpectorP.E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438–443.
62.
SpreitzerG.M. (1995a). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
63.
SpreitzerG.M. (1995b). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 601–629.
64.
ThomasK.W.VelthouseB.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.
65.
ThompsonD.P.McNamaraJ.F.HoyleJ.R. (1997). Job satisfaction in educational organizations: A synthesis of research findings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1), 7–37.
66.
ThorntonM.BrichenoP.ReidI. (2002). Students’ reasons for wanting to teach in primary school. Research in Education, 67, 34–43.
67.
UgboroI.O.ObengK. (2001). Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations: An empirical study. Journal of Quality Management, 5(2), 247–272.
68.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2000). Increasing the number of women teachers in rural schools: A synthesis of country case studies: South Asia.Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved January10, 2008, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001227/122720e.pdf
69.
WallT.D.WoodS.J.LeachD.J. (2004). Empowerment and performance. In CooperC.L.RobertsonI.T. (Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1–46). Chichester: Wiley.
70.
ZembylasM.PapanastasiouE.C. (2005). Modeling teacher empowerment: The role of job satisfaction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(5), 433–459.
71.
ZhouX.LynchJ.G.ChenO. (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.
