Purpose: The purpose of this research paper is to determine the effect of Gender on Perception of Glass Ceiling, mediated by Sex Role Orientation and Attitude towards Women as Managers.
Design/methodology/approach: An online survey was floated to 189 B-School students via email and social networking sights, out of which a total of 153 responses were collected and analyzed. The respondents were surveyed on their Sex Role Orientation, Attitude towards Women as Managers and Perception of Glass Ceiling. Available scales were used to measure each of these constructs.
Findings: Sex Role Orientation fully mediated Gender in relation to Perception of Glass Ceiling. However Attitude towards Women as Manager does not have any effect on Perception of Glass Ceiling or Gender. Moreover SRO has a greater effect on Perception of Glass Ceiling than Gender has. It is also seen that females have a higher SRO i.e., a more modern outlook than men who have a lower value of SRO i.e., a more traditional outlook. It is also seen that higher the value of SRO, lower is the perception of glass ceiling and that females have a lower perception of glass ceiling as compared to males.
Research limitations/implications: The sample space of respondents was limited to MBA School students. It does not take into account the respondents’ work experience. The current study could therefore only provide tentative conclusions.
Practical implications: Once the factors affecting Perception of Glass Ceiling are determined, organizations can work accordingly to eliminate this perception of glass ceiling among its employees.
Originality/value: This research has been done in the Indian Context. The scales we used to determine SRO and Perception of Glass Ceiling were designed specifically for the Indian Context. Since SRO differs widely from country to country, this research will enable us to find the link between Gender and Perception of Glass Ceiling specifically in the Indian context.
Adeyemi-BelloT.TomkiewiczJ. (1996). Attitudes of Nigerians towards women managers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(5), 133–139.
2.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
3.
BeckD.DavisE. (2005). EEO in senior management: Women executives in Westpac. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 273–288.
4.
BluedornA. (1983). Attitude and attributions towards women as managers and their performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, p. 397.
5.
BowenC.WuYanHwangC.SchererR. (2007). Holding up half of the sky? Attitudes towards women as managers in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2), 268–283.
6.
BrennerO.BeutellN. (1989). The effects of birth order and gender on American managers’ attitudes toward female managers. Journal of Social Psychology.
7.
CarterN.M.WelbourneT.M.PrimeJ.L. (2009). Women ‘take care’, men ‘take charge’: Managers’ stereotypic perceptions of women and men leaders. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 25–49.
8.
CernovoskyZ. (1986). Attitudes of male alcoholic towards equal freedom for women: Personality correlates. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 14(1), 85–87.
9.
CohenS.LeavengoodS. (1978). The utility of the Wams: Shouldn’t it relate to discriminatory behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 742–748.
10.
CortisR.CassarV. (2005). Perceptions of and about women as managers: Investigating job involvement, self-esteem and attitudes. Women in Management Review, 20(3), 149–164.
11.
DarkeP.R.ChaikenS. (2005). The pursuit of self-interest: Selfinterest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 864–883.
12.
DennisM.KunkelA. (2004). Perception of men, women and CEOs: The effects of gender identity. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 32(2), 155–171.
13.
DimovskiV.SkerlavajM.ManM. (2010). Comparative analysis of mid-level women managers’ perception of the existence of ‘glass ceiling’ in Singaporean and Malaysian organizations. International Business and Economic Research Journal, 9(8), 61–78.
14.
DipboyeR.L. (1978). Women as managers, stereotypes and realities. In SteadB.A.CliffsEnglewood (Eds), Women in management (pp. 2–10). NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
DonaldF.LiningtonJ. (2008). Work/family border and gender role orientation in male managers. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 659–671.
16.
DubnoP. (1985). Attitudes towards women executives: A longitudinal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 235–239.
17.
DuehrE.BonoJ. (2006). Men, women and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 815–846.
18.
EaglyA. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
EaglyA.DiekmanA.Johannesen-SchmidtM.KoenigA. (2004). Gender gaps in socio-political attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796–816.
20.
EaglyA.StevenJ.KarauS. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
21.
ElacquaT.TerryA.HansenC.WebsterJ. (2009). Managers’ beliefs about the glass ceiling: Interpersonal and organizational factors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 285–294.
22.
FortinN.M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416–438.
23.
GalankiE.PapalexandrisN.HalikiasJ. (2009). Revisiting leadership styles and attitudes towards women as managers in Greece 15 years later. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(7), 484–504.
24.
GarlandH.PriceK.H. (1977). Attitudes toward women in management and attributions for their success and failure in a managerial position. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 29–33.
25.
GitaN.IyerL. (1990). Attitude towards women managers. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(44), 2451–2452.
26.
GmürM. (2006). The gendered stereotype of the ‘good manager’ sex role expectations towards male and female managers. Management Review.
27.
GulhatiK. (1990). Attitudes toward women managers comparison of attitudes of male and female managers in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(7–8), 41–48.
28.
GutekB.A.SearleS.KlepaL. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.
29.
HarrisR.J.FirestoneJ.M.VegaW.A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463–483.
30.
HeilmanM.E.BlockC.J.RichardF.M. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 935–942.
31.
HerbertT.T.YostE.B. (1978b). Women as effective managers: A strategic model for overcoming the barriers. Human Resource Management, 17(2), 18–25.
32.
HoblerJ.M.WayneS.J.LemmonG. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal.
33.
International Labour Organization. (2002). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. Geneva: International Labour Office.
34.
JabesJ. (1980). Casual attributions and sex role stereotypes in the perceptions of women managers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 12(1), 52–63.
35.
JacksonJ.F.L.O’CallaghanE.M. (2009). What do we know about glass ceiling effects? A taxonomy and critical review to inform higher education research.
36.
JainN.ShomaM. (2010). The perception of ‘glass ceiling’ in Indian organizations: An exploratory study. South Asian Journal of Management, 17(1), 23–43.
37.
JudgeT.A.LivingstonB.A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology.
38.
KennyD.A.KashyD.A.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds), Handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233–265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
39.
KonradA.M.CanningsK. (1997). The effects of gender role congruence and statistical discrimination on managerial advancement. Human Relations (HR) Journal, 50, 1305–1328.
40.
LaneN. (2000). Female employment in sales organizations: Learning to manage the Pink Collar’ Army. Journal of Marketing Management.
41.
LarwoodLaurieWoodMarion M. (1977). Women in management. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. xiv, 199 p.
42.
LinehanM. (2002). Senior female international managers: Empirical evidence from Western Europe. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(5), 802–814.
43.
LinehanM.WalshJ.S. (1999). Senior female international managers: Breaking the glass border. Women in Management Review, 14(7), 264–272.
44.
LiuS.S.ComerL.B.DubinskyA. J. (2001). Gender differences in attitudes toward women as sales managers in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21, 303–311.
45.
ManningA.SaidiF. (2010). Understanding the gender pay gap: What’s competition got to do with it?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(4).
46.
MartinsL.L.ParsonsCharles K. (2007). Effects of gender diversity management on perceptions of organizational attractiveness: The role of individual differences in attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 865–875.
47.
Mathur-HelmB. (2006). Women and the glass ceiling in South African banks: An illusion or reality?Women in Management Review, 21(4), 311–326.
48.
MaznahI.ChooP.F. (1986). The factor structure of Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI). International Journal of Psychology, 21, 31–41.
NobleCarolynMooreSharon (2006). Advancing women and leadership in this post feminist, post EEO era: A discussion of the issues. Women in Management Review, 21 (7), 598 –603.
51.
NurayS.U.BasakB. (2002). Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: The effects of patriarchy, sexism and gender differences. The Journal of Psychology, 136(6), 647–656.
52.
ParkerB.FagensonE.A. (1994). In DavidsonM.J.BrukeR.J. (Eds), Women in management: Current research issues (pp. 11–28). London: Paul Chapman.
53.
PatilS. (2009). Male-dominated industries: Effects of gender rarity, performance, and diversity justification. Michigan Journal of Business, 2(1).
54.
PowellG.N.GravesL.M. (2003). Women and men in management (3rd ed.) London: Sage Publications.
55.
PrimeJ.L.CarterN.M. (2009). Women ‘take care’, men ‘take charge’: Managers’ stereotypic perceptions of women and men leaders. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 25–49.
56.
RhodenL. (2003). Relations between marital processes and outcomes in the marriages of non-traditional and traditional women. Psychological Reports, 92, 915–929.
57.
RoseG.L.AndiappanP. (1918). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 104–112.
58.
RosenB.JerdeeT.H. (1974). Effects of applicant’s sex and difficulty of job on evaluation of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 511–512.
59.
Sakalli-UgurluN.BeydoganB. (2002). Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: The effects of patriarchy, sexism and gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 136, 647–656.
60.
ScheinV.E. (1973). Relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.
61.
SchererR.PetrickJ. (2001). The effects of sex role orientation on team schema: A multivariate analysis of indicators in a U.S. federal health care organization. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 7–22.
62.
SchruijerS.G.L. (2006). Do women want to break the glass ceiling? A study of their career orientations and gender identity in the Netherlands. Management Review, 17(2), 143–154.
63.
SimpsonR.AltmanY. (2000). A time bounded glass ceiling: The career progress of young women managers, career progress and career success. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2, 3, 4), 190–198.
64.
SrivastavaP. (2007). Exposed: Glass ceiling at India Inc. Business Today, September23, 2007.
65.
StevensG.E.DenisiA.A.S. (1980). Women as managers: Attitudes and attributions for performance by men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 355–361.
66.
StrohL.K.LoyolaU.BrettJ.ReillyAnneH. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers’ career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 251–260.
67.
SuttonC.D.M.KrisK. (1985). Executive women—20 years later. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 42–66.
68.
TennantD.TennantS. (2008). Is there a glass ceiling in the Jamaica Financial Sector? Both sides of the story. Journal of Eastern Caribbean Studies, 33(4), 69–122.
69.
TerborgJ.R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647–664.
70.
TerborgJ.R.IlgenD.R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 352–376.
71.
TerborgJ. R.PeterL.H.IlgenD.R.SmithF. (1977). Organizational and personal correlates of attitudes toward women as managers. The Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 89–100.
72.
TerborgJ. R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647–664.
73.
ThomasK.W.KilmannR.H. (1975). The social desirability variable in organizational research: An alternative explanation for reported findings. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 741–752.
74.
TreasJ.WidmerE.D. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78, 1409–1436.
75.
UnterhalterE. (2005). Global inequality, capabilities, social justice: The millennium development goal for gender equality in education. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 111–122.
76.
Van VianenA.E.M.FischerA.H. (2002). Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 315–337.
77.
WalkerH.J.FieldH.S.GilesW.F.BernerthJ.B.Jones-FarmerL.A. (2007). An assessment of attraction toward affirmative action organizations: Investigating the role of individual differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 485–507.
78.
WileyM.G.EskilsonA. (1982). The interaction of sex and power base on perceptions of managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 671–677.
79.
YapM.KonradA. (2009). Gender and racial differentiations in promotions: Is there a sticky floor, a mid-level bottleneck, or a glass ceiling?Département des relations industrielles, université laval – issn., 64(4), 593–619.
