This study investigates the implementation of creative activities within instrumental music ensembles by exploring educator perspectives, practices, and perceived barriers. While national and state standards increasingly emphasize creative practices such as composition and improvisation, traditional performance-based pedagogy often remains dominant. Through a survey of practicing instrumental music educators, this research examines how teachers define creativity, the frequency and types of creative tasks they employ, the benefits they observe in students, and the challenges that hinder more widespread integration. The findings reveal a significant “value-action gap”: educators overwhelmingly believe in the positive value of creativity but face substantial barriers, most notably a lack of time for planning and preparation, the pressure of performance-oriented curricula, and insufficient pre-service and in-service training. The data suggests a self-perpetuating cycle wherein a lack of training leads to low confidence, which, compounded by systemic pressures, limits students’ creative opportunities. The study concludes that bridging this gap requires a multi-faceted approach, including targeted professional development, the provision of practical pedagogical resources, and a fundamental shift in music teacher education programs to better equip educators with the skills and confidence to foster creativity as an integral component of musicianship.
AllsupR. E. (2003). Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/334564
AllsupR. E. (2016). Remixing the classroom: Toward an open philosophy of music education. Indiana University Press.
4.
AllsupR. E.BenedictC. (2008). The problems of band: An inquiry into the future of instrumental music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 156–173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40327299
5.
AlmqvistC. F.WernerA. (2024). Maintaining and challenging conservative teaching and learning culture in conservatories: The need for holistic pedagogy in educational fields of tension. Research Studies in Music Education, 46(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X231187766
6.
BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Being creative inside and outside the classroom: How to boost your students’ creativity–and your own. Sense Publishers.
7.
BarrettM. S (2003). Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In HickeyM. (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 3–27). MENC. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:202197
8.
BeghettoR. A. (2021). There is no creativity without uncertainty: Dubito Ergo Creo. Journal of Creativity, 31, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100005
9.
BeghettoR. A.ZhaoY. (2022). Democratizing creative educational experiences. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), vii–xv. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221089872
10.
BishopL. (2018). Collaborative musical creativity: How ensembles coordinate spontaneity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01285
11.
BraunV.ClarkeV.BoultonE.DaveyL.McEvoyC. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
12.
BursteinS. D. (2016). Transformation of habitus and social trajectories: A retrospective study of a popular music program [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California].
13.
CottrellS. (2017). The creative work of large ensembles. In Rink, J., Gaunt, H., & Williamson, A. (Eds.), Musicians in the making: Pathways to creative performance (Vol. 1, pp. 156–205). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199346677.001.0001
14.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
15.
ElliottD. J.SilvermanM. (2014). Music matters: A philosophy of music education (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
16.
FitzpatrickK. (2014). Fostering creativity in the performance ensemble. In Barrett, J. R. & Webster, P. R. (Eds.), The musical experience: Rethinking music teaching and learning (pp. 205–219). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363032.001.0001
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum. (Original work published 1970)
19.
GilbertD. (2016). Curious, collaborative, creativity: Applying student-centered principles to performing ensembles. Music Educators Journal, 103(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432116677553
20.
HopkinsM. T. (2013). Factors contributing to teachers’ inclusion of music composition activities in the school orchestra curriculum. String Research Journal, 4(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921300100402
MenardE. A. (2015). Music composition in the high school curriculum: A multiple case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415574310
23.
National Association for Music Education. (2014). 2014 music standards (ensemble). NAfME.
24.
PeirceC. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (BurksA. W., Ed.; Vol. 5–8). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
25.
PluckerJ. A.BeghettoR. A.DowG. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
26.
RandlesC. (2020). To create: Imagining the good life through music. GIA Publications, Incorporated.
27.
RotjanM.NicholsonG. (2025). Creativity through recomposition in the music ensemble. Music Educators Journal, 111(4), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321251333809
28.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publishing Inc.
SilvermanM. (2021). Humanism, music education, and the musical “work.” In PerrineW. M. (Ed.), The future of the wind band: Philosopher and practitioner in dialog (pp. 91–112). GIA Publications.
34.
SlaytonM.BristolA. S.ViskontasI. V. (2019). Factors affecting group creativity: Lessons from musical ensembles. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.013
35.
StrandK. (2006). Survey of Indiana music teachers on using composition in the classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940605400206
