In Turkey, children are accepted to conservatory music departments after fourth grade and fine arts high school music departments after eighth grade by taking a musical talent test. For students with high musical aural skills to know about their potential and be directed to the related education institutions there needs to be a valid test. This study was, therefore, conducted to develop a valid internet-based test to assess music perception of children with design-based research. Design-based research includes a series of iterative stages that involve continuous data collection, analysis, and improvement, rather than a linear process in development and implementation activities. Voluntary-basis selected schools in the pilot city’s first through fourth grades (both public and private schools) were invited to join the preliminary test. A total of 433 students participated in the online test. The test has seven categories including pitch discrimination (single, two, and multiple tones), tempo, length, melody, and rhythm. For item analysis, two separate sequential samples were collected. The results were evaluated according to psychometric test development principles. The initial results show that the music perception test (AMAT) is a valid and reliable instrument. The test is open to public use and can be reached at: https://aummat.anadolu.edu.tr/amat/
ApaydınM. (2006). Eğitim fakülteleri güzel sanatlar eğitimi bölümü müzik öğretmenliği anabilim dallarına özel yetenek sınavları ile öğrenci alımına yönelik eleştirel yaklaşımlı bir değerlendirme. Ulusal Müzik Eğitimi Sempozyumu. Burdur: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, 429–458.
2.
ApplebaumE.EgelA. L.KoegelR. L.ImhoffB. (1979). Measuring musical abilities of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 279–285.
3.
BarrosC. G.SwardfagerW.MorenoS.BortzG.IlariB.JackowskiA. P.PloubidisG.LittleT. D.LamontA.Cogo-MoreiraH. (2017). Assessing music perception in young children: Evidence for and psychometric features of the M-factor. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 18.
4.
BeaujeanA. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
5.
BeheshtiJ. (2012). Virtual environments for children and teens. Virtual reality in psychological, medical and pedagogical applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/51628
6.
BentleyA. (1966). Musical ability in children and its measurement. George G. Harrap.
7.
BilgicH. G.DoganD.SeferogluS. S. (2016). Digital natives in online learning environments: New bottle old wine – The design of online learning environments for today’s generation. In PinheiroM.SimõesD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on engaging digital natives in higher education settings (pp. 192–221). Information Science Reference.
8.
Boll-AvetisyanN.BhataraA.HöhleB. (2020). Processing of rhythm in speech and music in adult dyslexia. Brain Sciences, 10(5), 261.
9.
BoyleJ. D.RadocyR. E. (1987). Measurement and evaluation of musical experiences. Schirmer Books.
10.
ÇarıkcıS.ÜnlüerN. Ö.TorunŞ. (2021). Effects of cadence-compatible melodic rhythmic auditory stimulation implementation on gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 38(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2020.1864314
11.
CampanelliA.RendaceL.ParisiF.D’AntonioF.ImbrianoL.de LenaC.TrebbastoniA. (2016). Musical cognition in Alzheimer’s disease: Application of the montreal battery of evaluation of amusia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1375(1), 28–37.
12.
CarrollJ. M. (2004). Beyond fun. Interactions, 11(5), 38–40.
13.
CarsonA. D. (1998). Why has musical aptitude assessment fallen flat? And what can we do about it?Journal of Career Assessment6, 311–327.
14.
ComeauG. (2009). Piano pedagogy: A research and information guide (1st ed.). Routledge.
15.
CoşkunG. (2008). Müzik eğitimi anabilim dalı özel yetenek sınavını kazanan öğrencilerin ezgi işitme ve ritim işitme boyutu başarı düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Gazi University Ankara.
16.
CoulacoglouC.SaklofskeD. H. (2017). Psychometrics and psychological assessment principles and applications. Academic Press.
17.
Dalla BellaS.FarrugiaN.BenoitC. E.BegelV.VergaL.HardingE.KotzS. A. (2017). BAASTA: Battery for the assessment of auditory sensorimotor and timing abilities. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1128–1145.
18.
DeMarsC. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.
19.
DemirbatırE. (2004). Uludağ University eğitim fakültesi güzel sanatlar eğitimi bölümü müzik eğitimi anabilim dalı 2001-2002 öğretim yılı giriş yetenek sınavında uygulanan müziksel işitme testinin değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ University Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 29–38.
20.
DeutschD. (1975). The organization of short-term memory for a single acoustic attribute. In DeutschD.DeutschJ. A. (Eds.), Short-term memory (pp. 107–151). Academic Press.
21.
DrakeR. M. (1954). Drake musical aptitude tests. Science Research Associates; a revised ed. appeared in 1957.
22.
EceA. S.KaplanS. (2008). Müziksel algılama işitme, okuma, yazma ses ve çalgı yeteneği arasındaki ilişkilerin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(1), 285–296.
23.
FacionP. A.FacionN. C. (1993). The California critical thinking skills test: Form A and form B, test manual. California Academic Press.
GastonE. T. (1957). A test of musicality. Odell’s Instrumental Service.
26.
GöğüşG. (1995). Eğitim fakülteleri müzik eğitimi bölümlerine giriş yetenek sınavlarının değerlendirilmesi [Unpublished dissertation]. Gazi University.
27.
GordonE. E. (1965). Musical aptitude profile. GIA.
28.
GordonE. E. (1979). Primary measures of music audiation. GIA.
29.
GordonE. E. (1982). Intermediate measures of music audiation. GIA.
30.
GordonE. E. (1989a). Advanced measures of music audiation. GIA.
31.
GordonE. E. (1989b). Audie: A game for understanding and analyzing your child’s music potential. GIA Publications, Inc.
32.
GrashelJ. (2008). The measurement of musical aptitude in 20th century United States: A brief history. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 176, 45–49.
33.
GreenT.McKeownD. (2007). The role of auditory memory traces in attention to frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 69 (6), 942–951.
34.
HodgesH.HaackP. (1996). The influence of music on human behavior. In HodgesD. (Ed.), Handbook of music psychology (pp. 29–68). University of Texas at San Antonio: IMR Press.
35.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Sage.
36.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
37.
HuronD.ParncuttR. (1993). An improved model of tonality perception incorporating pitch salience and echoic memory. Psychomusicology, 12, 154–171.
38.
IversenJ. R.PatelA. D. (2008, August 25–29). The Beat Alignment Test (BAT): Surveying beat processing abilities in the general population. In MiyazakiK.HiragaY.AdachiM.NakajimaY.TsuzakiM. (Eds.) Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Music Perception Cognition (pp. 465–468). Sapporo, Japan.
39.
KwalwasserJ.DykemaP. W. (1930). KD music tests: Manual of directions. C. Fischer, Incorporated.
40.
LaneS.ZhangY. (2019). Psychometric considerations for music performance assessments. In BrophyT. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment policy and practice in music education (Vol. 1, pp. 416–436). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190248093.013.19
41.
LawL. N. C.ZentnerM. (2012). Assessing musical abilities objectively: Construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e52508.
42.
Lifshitz-Ben-BasatA.FostickL. (2019). Music-related abilities among readers with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(3), 318–334.
43.
LongN. H. (1965). A revision of the University of Oregon Music Discrimination Tests [Unpublished dissertation]. Indiana University.
44.
LongN. H. (1969). Establishment of standards for the Indiana-Oregon Music Discrimination Test based on a cross-section of elementary and secondary students with an analysis of elements of environment, intelligence and musical experience and training in relation to music discrimination. Revised Final Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED027337
45.
McDermottJ.HauserM. (2005). The origins of music: Innateness, uniqueness, and evolution. Music Perception, 23(1), 29–59.
46.
McPhersonG. (2016). The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. Oxford Handbooks.
47.
MurphyC. (1999). How far do tests of musical ability shed light on the nature of musical intelligence?British Journal of Music Education16, 39–50.
48.
NeesM. A. (2016). Have we forgotten auditory sensory memory? Retention intervals in studies of nonverbal auditory working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1892.
49.
PeakI.ColeK. (2020). Using R for item response theory model applications. Routledge.
50.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–5.
51.
ReadyE. A.McGarryL. M.RinchonC.HolmesJ. D.GrahnJ. A. (2019). Beat perception ability and instructions to synchronize influence gait when walking to music-based auditory cues. Gait Posture, 68, 555–561.
52.
ReevesT. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In AkkerJ. V. D.GravemeijerK.McKenneyS.NieveenN. (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). Routledge.
53.
RizopoulosD. (2006). ltm: An r package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1–25.
54.
RoyR. A. (2018). Auditory working memory: A comparison study in adults with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss. Global Journal of Otolaryngology, 13(3), 1–14.
55.
SeashoreC. E. (1919). Seashore measures of musical talents. Columbia Phonograph Company.
56.
SeashoreC. E. (1938). Musical intelligence. Music Education, 24, 32–33.
57.
SevgiA.ŞengülC. (2003). Müzik eğitimi bölümleri giriş-yetenek sınavlarına başvuran adayların müziksel işitme –yineleme sınavındaki soru tiplerine göre başarı durumlarının belirlenmesi. Müzik Sempozyumu, Malatya (pp. 232–239). İnönü University Yayınları.
58.
SutcliffeA. (2009). Designing for user engagement: Aesthetic and attractive user interfaces. In CarrollJ. M. (Series Ed.), Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 1–55). Morgan & Claypool.
59.
TarmanS. (2003). Gazi University müzik eğitimi anabilim dalı giriş müzik yetenek sınavlarının geçerlik ve güvenirlik yönünden incelenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Müzik Sempozyumu, Malatya (pp. 363–377). İnönü University Yayını.
60.
TarmanS. (2006). Müzik Eğitimin Temelleri. Müzik Eğitimi Yayınları. Birinci Basım.
61.
ThompsonJ. M.GoswamiU. (2008). Rhythmic processing in children with developmental dyslexia: Auditory and motor rhythms link to reading and spelling. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 120–129.
62.
ThompsonW. F.OlsenK. N. (2020). The science and psychology of music: From Beethoven at the office to Beyoncé at the gym. Greenwood.
63.
TorunS.ÇiyiltepeM. (2015). Rhythm and Pitch Perception in Parkinson’s Disease. Cognitive XII (International Congress of Cognitive Neuroscience)14–17 May 2015, İstanbul. Congress Abs Book, 65–68.
64.
TripathyS. P.ÖǧmenH. (2018). Sensory memory is allocated exclusively to the current event-segment. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1435.
65.
TuncaO. E. (2011). Devlet konservatuvarı oyunculuk sanat dalı özel yetenek sınavlarının müziksel işitme ve şan boyutu içın bir test geliştirme çalışması. Folklor/Edebiyat, 17(65), 153–162. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fe/issue/26029/274147
66.
TuncaO. E. (2012). A different approach to competence evaluation for conservatory entrance exams ın Turkey, INTED 2012 (6th International Technology, Education and Development Conference). Valencia, Spain, March 5–7, 2012.
67.
TuncaO. E. (2014). Devlet konservatuvarları müzik bölümü öncesi çağdaki çocuklar için müziksel işitme becerisi ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Anadolu uluslararası Sanat Eğitimi Sempozyumu-Sanat Eğitiminde Dönüşümler. 14–16 Mayıs 2014.
68.
VuustP.HeggliO. A.FristonK. J.KringelbachM. L. (2022) Music in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(5), 287–305.
69.
WesolowskiB. C.WindS. A. (2019). Pedagogical considerations for examining rater variability in rater-mediated assessments: A three-model framework. Journal of Educational Measurement, 56(3), 521–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12224
70.
WingH. (1948). Tests of musical ability and appreciation: An investigation into the measurement, distribution, and development of musical capacity. Cambridge University.
71.
WingH. (1981). Standardized Tests of Musical Intelligence. Cambridge University.
72.
YaylaA. (2003). Müziksel Yeteneğin Ölçümü [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
73.
YaylaA.YaylaF. (2009). Müziksel algılama ölçeği. 8. Ulusal Müzik Eğitimi Sempozyumu.
74.
YaylaF. (2006). Müziksel İşitmenin Genel Prensipleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Aralık, 12, 28–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
