Gender in music has been explored over recent decades with growing recognition of the challenges that are faced by women in the field. There has been substantial work exploring the Western music canon but little that addresses the music of Australian women, and more specifically, repertoire written for the wind band genre. With thousands of Australian children every year starting their musical journey in their school band, this is an area that has potential for significant impact in addressing the continued gender disparity for composers. In addition, the substantial influence of the conductor in repertoire selection and promotion of the music of women cannot be denied. This article draws its insights from an action research project that explores the journeys and experiences of Australian women composers through interviews along with artistic collaborations between myself and these composers. Furthermore, Australian conductors of wind bands were surveyed to ascertain their understanding of the role that they may play in facilitating change in this area. This article addresses the barriers that composers and conductors experience, the benefits of networks, the generation of additional repertoire, and the subsequent implications for educational contexts.
BakerV.BiggersC. (2018).
Research-to-resource: Programming ensemble literature composed by women.Update: Applications of Research in Music Education,
36(3), 51–54.
6.
BartleetB. L.EllisC. (2009). Music autoethnographies: Making autoethnography sing: Making music personal.
Australian Academic Press.
7.
BennettD.HennekamS.MacarthurS.HopeC.GohT. (2019).
Hiding gender: How female composers manage gender identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
113, 20–32.
BorgdoffH. (2010). The production of knowledge in artistic research. In BiggsM.KarlssonH. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to research in the arts.
Taylor & Francis. 44–63.
CitronM. J. (1993). Gender and the musical canon.
Cambridge University Press.
15.
CitronM. J. (2007).
Women and the Western art canon: Where are we now?Notes,
64(2), 209–215.
16.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher – Using our selves in research.
Jessica Kingsley.
17.
EvansM.EdwardsM.BurmesterB.MayD. (2014). ‘
Not yet 50/50’ – Barriers to the progress of senior women in the Australian public service. Australian Journal of Public Administration,
73(4), 501–510.
18.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2012).
Cultural diversity and the formation of identity: Our role as music teachers. Music Educators Journal,
98(4), 53–59.
19.
GlickmanS.SchleiferM. F. (2003). From convent to concert hall: A guide to women composers.
Greenwood Press.
20.
GuerreroG. (2019). Opening plenary session. Paper presented at the League of American Orchestras, Nashville. https://youtu.be/qTDxo3w_DSk
21.
HartleyG. (2018). Fed up: Emotional labor, women, and the way forward.
HarperCollins Publishers.
22.
HolmesM. A.OconnellS.DuttK.HolmesM. A.OconnellS.DuttK. (2015). Women in the Geosciences: Practical, positive practices toward parity.
American Geophysical Union.
JensenC. J. (2014).
An examination of the attitude of 5-12 instrumental music educators towards using wind band literature written by female composers and the relationship of those attitudes to selected demographic variables [Master’s thesis]. University of Nebraska.
25.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2008). Participatory action research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605).
SAGE.
26.
KumarA. B. (2016). On representation in wind band repertoire: Opinion essay. anitabkumar.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/on-representation-in-wind-band-repertoire.pdf
27.
MacarthurS. (2014).
The woman composer, new music and neoliberalism. Musicology Australia – Journal of the Musicological Society of Australia,
36(1), 36–52.
28.
MartinI. (2014, December 17). Secrets from down under: The best Australian band repertoire you’ve never heard. Paper presented at the Midwest Band & Orchestra Clinic, Chicago, IL, United States.
29.
McClaryS. (1993).
Reshaping a discipline: Musicology and feminism in the 1990s. Feminist Studies,
19(2), 399–423.
30.
McClaryS. (2002). Feminine endings.
University of Minnesota Press.
31.
McIntoshP. (2010). Action research and reflective practice: Creative and visual methods to facilitate reflection and learning.
Routledge.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering.
National Academies Press.
RobsonC. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.).
Blackwell Publishers.
40.
SlaytonM. K. (2011). Women of influence in contemporary music: Nine American composers.
Scarecrow Press.
41.
TaylorB. D. (2002).
Creative collaboration: Defining the collaborative process between a conductor, composer, and choreographer in creating and staging an original work for modern dance [Doctoral thesis]. The University of Arizona.
42.
ThrosbyD.ZednikA. (2011).
Multiple job-holding and artistic careers: Some empirical evidence. Cultural Trends,
20(1), 9–24.
WestlundN. (2016).
Student perceptions and attitudes regarding the diversity of music in their high school band classroom [Master’s thesis]. Eastern Washington University.
45.
World Association for Symphonic Bands and Ensembles. (2017). World Association for Symphonic Bands and Ensembles: Repertoire list. www.wasbe.org/repertoire-list
